You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 2, 2025

Details for Patent: 5,508,042


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,508,042
Title: Controlled release oxycodone compositions
Abstract:A method for substantially reducing the range in daily dosages required to control pain in approximately 90% of patients is disclosed whereby an oral solid controlled release dosage formulation having from about 10 to about 40 mg of oxycodone or a salt thereof is administered to a patient. The formulation provides a mean maximum plasma concentration of oxycodone from about 6 to about 60 ng/ml from a mean of about 2 to about 4.5 hours after administration, and a mean minimum plasma concentration from about 3 to about 30 ng/ml from about 10 to about 14 hours after repeated "q12h" (i.e. every 12 hour) administration through steady-state conditions. Another embodiment is directed to a method for substantially reducing the range in daily dosages required to control pain in substantially all patients by administering an oral solid controlled release dosage formulation comprising up to about 160 mg of oxycodone or a salt thereof, such that a mean maximum plasma concentration of oxycodone up to about 240 ng/ml from a mean of up to about 2 to about 4.5 hours after administration, and a mean minimum plasma concentration up to about 120 ng/ml from about 10 to about 14 hours after repeated "q12h" (i.e., every 12 hour) administration through steady-state conditions are achieved. Controlled release oxycodone formulations for achieving the above are also disclosed.
Inventor(s): Oshlack; Benjamin (New York, NY), Chasin; Mark (Manalpan, NJ), Minogue; John J. (Mount Vernon, NY), Kaiko; Robert F. (Weston, CT)
Assignee: Euro-Celtigue, S.A. (Luxembourg, LU)
Application Number:08/467,584
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 5,508,042: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 5,508,042, hereafter referred to as the '042 patent, is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in the realm of controlled release oxycodone medications. This patent, along with its related patents, has been at the center of several legal battles and has played a crucial role in shaping the market for opioid analgesics.

Background and Related Patents

The '042 patent is a divisional of U.S. Patent No. 5,549,912 (the '912 patent), which itself is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Patent No. 5,266,331 (the '331 patent)[1].

  • The '912 patent and its related patents, including the '042 patent, are critical for Purdue Pharma's controlled release oxycodone product, OxyContin®.
  • These patents cover various aspects of the formulation, including the controlled release mechanism and the dosage range of oxycodone.

Scope of the Patent

The '042 patent specifically deals with controlled release oxycodone formulations, which are designed to provide a steady and prolonged release of the opioid analgesic. Here are some key aspects of its scope:

Controlled Release Mechanism

  • The patent describes a formulation that uses a matrix or reservoir system to control the release of oxycodone over an extended period. This mechanism is crucial for managing moderate to severe pain without the need for frequent dosing[1].

Dosage Range

  • One of the significant claims of the '042 patent is the "surprising discovery" of a four-fold dosage range for oxycodone, which allows for more efficient titration and better pain management. This dosage range is a key differentiator from prior art and is linked to the in vivo parameters set forth in the claims[1].

Claims of the Patent

The claims of the '042 patent are detailed and specific, focusing on the unique aspects of the controlled release formulation:

Claim Structure

  • The claims are structured to cover the composition of the controlled release formulation, the method of its manufacture, and the method of use.
  • For example, the claims specify the type of matrix or reservoir system used, the amount of oxycodone included, and the release profile over time[1].

Key Claim Elements

  • The claims emphasize the "surprising discovery" of the four-fold dosage range and its clinical significance in providing a more efficient titration process.
  • The claims also highlight the specific in vivo parameters that are linked to the newly discovered dosage range, which are critical for the patent's validity[1].

Patent Landscape

The '042 patent operates within a complex patent landscape, particularly in the context of pharmaceuticals and opioid analgesics.

Litigation History

  • The '042 patent was involved in a significant litigation between Purdue Pharma and Endo Pharmaceuticals. The trial court found that Endo's proposed generic versions of OxyContin® would infringe Purdue's patents, but also determined that the patents were unenforceable due to inequitable conduct during prosecution[1].

Antitrust and Unfair Trade Practices

  • The litigation also involved antitrust and unfair trade practice claims, highlighting the competitive and regulatory complexities surrounding pharmaceutical patents[1].

Impact on Generic Manufacturers

  • The '042 patent, along with other related patents, has been used to block the entry of generic versions of OxyContin® into the market. This has significant implications for generic manufacturers and the overall pharmaceutical market[4].

Inequitable Conduct

One of the critical issues surrounding the '042 patent is the finding of inequitable conduct during its prosecution.

Materiality of Information

  • The trial court found that Purdue had withheld material information from the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), specifically regarding the "surprising discovery" of the four-fold dosage range and its clinical significance. This information was deemed material because it established a prima facie case of unpatentability or refuted positions taken by Purdue during the prosecution[1].

Intentional Misrepresentation

  • The court also found a clear pattern of intentional misrepresentation by Purdue, which led to the determination that the patents were unenforceable[1].

Industry Impact

The '042 patent and its related patents have had a significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in the area of opioid analgesics.

Market Dominance

  • Purdue Pharma's control over the market for controlled release oxycodone formulations has been a subject of controversy and legal challenge. The patents have allowed Purdue to maintain a dominant position in the market for OxyContin®[1].

Regulatory Scrutiny

  • The litigation and findings of inequitable conduct have also drawn regulatory scrutiny, highlighting the need for transparency and ethical conduct in patent prosecution[1].

Conclusion

The '042 patent is a pivotal patent in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in the context of controlled release oxycodone formulations. Its scope and claims are detailed and specific, focusing on the unique aspects of the formulation. However, the patent's validity and enforceability have been challenged due to findings of inequitable conduct.

Key Takeaways

  • The '042 patent covers controlled release oxycodone formulations with a specific dosage range.
  • The patent was involved in significant litigation, including findings of inequitable conduct.
  • The patent landscape for opioid analgesics is complex, with implications for generic manufacturers and regulatory scrutiny.
  • Transparency and ethical conduct are crucial in patent prosecution to avoid issues of inequitable conduct.

FAQs

What is the main subject of United States Patent 5,508,042?

The main subject of the '042 patent is controlled release oxycodone formulations for the treatment of moderate to severe pain.

What is the significance of the four-fold dosage range in the '042 patent?

The four-fold dosage range is a "surprising discovery" that allows for more efficient titration and better pain management, and it is a key differentiator from prior art.

Why was the '042 patent found unenforceable?

The '042 patent was found unenforceable due to inequitable conduct during its prosecution, specifically the withholding of material information and intentional misrepresentation.

How has the '042 patent impacted the pharmaceutical industry?

The '042 patent has allowed Purdue Pharma to maintain a dominant position in the market for controlled release oxycodone formulations, but it has also drawn regulatory scrutiny and legal challenges.

What are the implications for generic manufacturers?

The '042 patent and related patents have been used to block the entry of generic versions of OxyContin® into the market, which has significant implications for generic manufacturers and the overall pharmaceutical market.

Sources

  1. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, "Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.", 2006.
  2. FDA Approval Letter, "Oxycodone Hydrochloride Extended-Release Tablets", 2004.
  3. bioRxiv, "Synthetic Biology - Mapping the Patent Landscape", 2018.
  4. FTC, "Complaint Counsel's Motion for Partial Summary Decision", 2017.
  5. Justia, "Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.", Federal Appellate Courts.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,508,042

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Patented / Exclusive UseSubmissiondate
No data available in table
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Patented / Exclusive Use>Submissiondate
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries

International Family Members for US Patent 5,508,042

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Austria 144418 ⤷  Try for Free
Austria 226822 ⤷  Try for Free
Austria 261725 ⤷  Try for Free
Austria 261726 ⤷  Try for Free
Austria 261727 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 5 of 5 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.