The Chiral Switch: A Pharmaceutical Tactic to Prolong Exclusivity

Copyright © DrugPatentWatch. Originally published at https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/blog/
hand touching reflection on mirror
Photo by cottonbro studio on Pexels.com

Enantiomer Switching: A Pharmaceutical Strategy to Extend Drug Patents

Enantiomer switching, also known as chiral switching, is a strategy employed by pharmaceutical companies to extend the patent life and market exclusivity of branded drugs. It involves developing and marketing a single enantiomer (mirror-image isomer) of a previously approved racemic (mixture of enantiomers) drug.

How Enantiomer Switching Works

  1. Identify a Marketed Racemic Drug Nearing Patent Expiration
    Companies look for successful racemic drugs whose patents are about to expire, opening the door for generic competition.
  2. Resolve and Characterize the Individual Enantiomers
    The individual enantiomers of the racemic drug are separated and studied for their pharmacological properties.
  3. Conduct Clinical Trials for the Desired Enantiomer
    Clinical trials are carried out to demonstrate improved safety, efficacy, or other benefits of the desired single enantiomer over the racemate.
  4. File a New Drug Application for the Single Enantiomer
    A new drug application is filed with regulatory authorities like the FDA for the purified single enantiomer product.
  5. Market the “Purified” Single Enantiomer as a Patented Line Extension
    The single enantiomer is marketed as a patented line extension, allowing the company to maintain exclusivity and delay generic competition.[1][4]

Notable Examples of Enantiomer Switching

  • Nexium (esomeprazole): The S-enantiomer of the racemic drug Prilosec (omeprazole) for acid reflux disease, extending AstraZeneca’s market exclusivity.[1]
  • Lexapro (escitalopram): The S-enantiomer of Celexa (citalopram) for depression.
  • Xopenex (levalbuterol): The R-enantiomer of Ventolin (albuterol) for asthma.
  • Lunesta (eszopiclone): The S-enantiomer of Doxepin (doxepin) for insomnia.[1]

Criticisms and Limitations

While chiral switching can provide therapeutic benefits by increasing potency and reducing adverse effects, it has faced criticism as a commercial strategy to extend exclusivity rather than a medical advancement.[3] Regulatory authorities evaluate each case based on evidence of meaningful clinical improvements over the racemate.

The thalidomide case demonstrates the limitations of this strategy. Its S-enantiomer caused severe birth defects, and the R-enantiomer rapidly interconverted to the S-form, making a chiral switch ineffective for avoiding teratogenicity.[2][3]

Regulatory Oversight and Cost Considerations

Pharmaceutical companies are not required to conduct randomized clinical trials directly comparing the single enantiomer to the racemic precursor before receiving FDA approval.[1][3] This raises concerns about the higher costs incurred by chiral switching without clear patient benefits.

Regulatory authorities, healthcare organizations, and policymakers are exploring ways to encourage or require high-quality comparative trials to inform the appropriate use of these more expensive therapeutics.[4]

Citations:
[1] https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2779579
[2] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8877306/
[3] https://www.geo.arizona.edu/xtal/geos306/Agranat2002.pdf
[4] https://www.ajmc.com/view/assessing-the-chiral-switch-approval-and-use-of-single-enantiomer-drugs-2001-to-2011
[5] https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M19-1085

Make Better Decisions with DrugPatentWatch

» Start Your Free Trial Today «

Copyright © DrugPatentWatch. Originally published at
DrugPatentWatch - Make Better Decisions
Scroll to Top