You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 14, 2025

Daclizumab - Biologic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Recent Clinical Trials for daclizumab

Identify potential brand extensions & biosimilar entrants

SponsorPhase
University of AlbertaPhase 1/Phase 2
Alberta Innovates Health SolutionsPhase 1/Phase 2
Northwestern UniversityPhase 1

See all daclizumab clinical trials

Recent Litigation for daclizumab

Identify key patents and potential future biosimilar entrants

District Court Litigation
Case NameDate
AbbVie Inc. v. Hetero USA, Inc.2024-08-08
AbbVie Inc. v. Hetero USA, Inc.2023-11-20
Janssen Biotech, Inc. v. Amgen Inc.2022-11-29

See all daclizumab litigation

PTAB Litigation
PetitionerDate
2017-12-20
2012-09-25

See all daclizumab litigation

Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. General brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for daclizumab Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for daclizumab Derived from Company Disclosures

No patents found based on company disclosures

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for daclizumab Derived from Patent Text Search

No patents found based on company disclosures

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Biologic Drug: Daclizumab

Introduction

Daclizumab, marketed under the trade name Zinbryta, is a humanized monoclonal antibody that was approved for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS) in adults. Despite its therapeutic potential, the drug's market journey was marked by significant challenges and eventual withdrawal. Here, we delve into the market dynamics and financial trajectory of daclizumab.

Approval and Initial Market Expectations

In May 2016, the FDA approved daclizumab for the treatment of RMS, with Biogen and AbbVie as the primary manufacturers. The approval came with stringent requirements, including postmarketing studies and a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) due to the drug's complex safety profile[1][5].

Market Positioning and Sales Projections

At the time of its approval, daclizumab was expected to generate significant revenue. Projections suggested annual sales could range between $100 million and $250 million. This optimism was based on the drug's efficacy in reducing lesion size and slowing disease progression in RMS patients[5].

Safety Concerns and Regulatory Oversight

From the outset, daclizumab's safety profile was a major concern. The drug carried a boxed warning about the risk of liver injury and other immune-mediated disorders. The REMS program restricted its distribution, and continuous monitoring by regulatory agencies was necessary to update product labeling as new adverse events were reported[1].

Adverse Events and Market Withdrawal

Despite initial hopes, the safety concerns surrounding daclizumab escalated. In 2018, Biogen and AbbVie announced a voluntary withdrawal of Zinbryta from the global market due to the evolving benefit/risk profile and reports of serious inflammatory brain disorders. The European Medicines Agency had previously recalled the drug following 12 such reports worldwide[1][4].

Financial Impact of Withdrawal

The withdrawal of Zinbryta had a significant financial impact on the manufacturers. The drug, which was part of Biogen's and AbbVie's portfolio, no longer contributed to their revenue streams. This loss was particularly notable given the initial investment and expectations surrounding the drug's market performance[1][5].

Pipeline and Strategic Adjustments

Biogen, in particular, had a robust pipeline of other biologic drugs that helped mitigate the financial impact of Zinbryta's withdrawal. Products like AVONEX, TYSABRI, and RITUXAN continued to perform well, and the company had a strong late-stage pipeline with 15 products in Phase II or beyond. This diversified portfolio allowed Biogen to maintain strong financial results despite the setback with Zinbryta[2].

Market Trends in Biologics

The biologics market, of which daclizumab was a part, continues to grow rapidly. The market size is expected to reach USD 699.5 billion by 2032, driven by factors such as the rising prevalence of chronic diseases, technological advancements, and the growing adoption of biosimilars. However, the case of daclizumab highlights the importance of careful risk assessment and continuous monitoring in this sector[3].

Lessons Learned

The story of daclizumab serves as a cautionary tale for biologic drug development. It underscores the need for thorough safety evaluations and the importance of a robust risk management strategy. Despite its therapeutic benefits, the drug's complex safety profile and limited patient base ultimately led to its withdrawal from the market.

Impact on Patients and Healthcare Providers

The withdrawal of Zinbryta necessitated a careful transition of patients to alternative treatments. Healthcare providers had to be informed and involved in this process to ensure patient safety. The FDA and manufacturers worked closely to ensure a well-organized withdrawal and to provide necessary information to healthcare professionals[1].

Key Takeaways

  • Approval and Expectations: Daclizumab was approved in 2016 with significant market expectations but was eventually withdrawn due to safety concerns.
  • Safety Profile: The drug had a complex safety profile, leading to a REMS program and continuous regulatory oversight.
  • Market Withdrawal: The voluntary withdrawal in 2018 was due to adverse events, including serious inflammatory brain disorders.
  • Financial Impact: The withdrawal affected the revenue streams of Biogen and AbbVie, though Biogen's diversified pipeline helped mitigate the loss.
  • Market Trends: The biologics market continues to grow, but the case of daclizumab highlights the importance of safety and risk management.

FAQs

What was the primary reason for the withdrawal of daclizumab from the market?

The primary reason for the withdrawal of daclizumab (Zinbryta) from the market was the evolving benefit/risk profile and reports of serious inflammatory brain disorders, including immune-mediated encephalitis[1][4].

How did the withdrawal of Zinbryta affect Biogen and AbbVie financially?

The withdrawal of Zinbryta resulted in the loss of a potential revenue stream for both Biogen and AbbVie. However, Biogen's diversified pipeline and other successful products helped mitigate this financial impact[1][2].

What were the initial market expectations for daclizumab?

Initial market expectations projected annual sales of daclizumab to be between $100 million and $250 million[5].

What regulatory measures were in place for daclizumab due to its safety profile?

Daclizumab was subject to a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) and carried a boxed warning about the risk of liver injury and other immune-mediated disorders[1].

How did the biologics market respond to the withdrawal of daclizumab?

The withdrawal of daclizumab did not significantly impact the overall growth trajectory of the biologics market, which continues to expand driven by various factors including technological advancements and the growing adoption of biosimilars[3].

Sources

  1. FDA working with manufacturers to withdraw Zinbryta from the market in the United States - FDA
  2. Schedule 14A - Biogen | Investor Relations - Biogen
  3. Biologics Market Size to Reach USD 699.5 Billion by 2032 - Biospace
  4. Characterization of the Impact of Daclizumab Beta on Circulating NK Cells - Frontiers in Immunology
  5. Daclizumab - Wikipedia

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.