You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 24, 2024

Poliovirus vaccine inactivated - Biologic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for poliovirus vaccine inactivated
Tradenames:1
High Confidence Patents:0
Applicants:2
BLAs:2
Suppliers: see list2
Pharmacology for poliovirus vaccine inactivated
Physiological EffectActively Acquired Immunity
Established Pharmacologic ClassInactivated Poliovirus Vaccine
Chemical StructurePoliovirus Vaccines
Vaccines, Inactivated
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. General brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for poliovirus vaccine inactivated Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for poliovirus vaccine inactivated Derived from Company Disclosures

No patents found based on company disclosures

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for poliovirus vaccine inactivated Derived from Patent Text Search

No patents found based on company disclosures

Poliovirus vaccine inactivated Market Analysis and Financial Projection Experimental

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine (IPV)

Introduction

The inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) market is a critical component of global health efforts aimed at eradicating polio. Despite significant progress in polio eradication, the market for IPV faces several challenges and opportunities. Here, we delve into the market dynamics, financial trajectory, and key factors influencing the IPV market.

Market Size and Forecast

The global IPV market was valued at USD 10.00 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 14.07 billion by 2031, growing at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 5.1% during the forecast period of 2024-2031[1].

Market Segmentation

By Type

The IPV market is segmented into monovalent IPV (mIPV) and trivalent IPV (tIPV). Monovalent IPV contains one strain of inactivated poliovirus, while trivalent IPV contains all three strains, providing broader immunity[1].

By End-User

The primary end-users of IPV include hospitals, clinics, and government agencies. Hospitals and clinics administer IPV as part of routine immunization programs, while government agencies are responsible for procuring and distributing IPV for national immunization efforts[1].

By Distribution Channel

IPV is distributed through government channels, private healthcare providers, and non-profit organizations. Government distribution is a significant channel, especially for national immunization programs[1].

By Geography

The market is geographically segmented into North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East and Africa. Each region has varying levels of polio incidence and vaccination coverage, influencing the demand for IPV[1].

Key Drivers and Restraints

Drivers

  • Global Polio Eradication Efforts: Despite the success in many regions, polio still poses a threat in certain areas, driving the demand for IPV.
  • Routine Immunization: IPV is part of routine childhood immunization schedules in many countries, ensuring a steady demand.
  • Public Health Initiatives: Government and international organizations' efforts to eradicate polio continue to support the market[1][3].

Restraints

  • High Production Costs: The intricate procedures and strict quality control standards required for IPV production drive up costs, making it less accessible in low-income areas[1].
  • Regulatory Difficulties: Stringent regulatory criteria for vaccine approval can delay new IPV producers or variants from entering the market[1].
  • Competition from OPV: Oral Poliovirus Vaccine (OPV) is cheaper to produce and administer, potentially reducing the market share of IPV in cost-sensitive regions[1][2].
  • Vaccine Hesitancy: Misinformation and mistrust in vaccines can lower demand for IPV, particularly in areas with high vaccine hesitancy[1][4].
  • Infrastructure and Logistics Challenges: The need for cold chain infrastructure to preserve vaccine potency can be a significant challenge in areas with limited infrastructure[1].

Financial Considerations

Cost-Effectiveness

The cost-effectiveness of IPV versus OPV is a critical factor in immunization strategies. While IPV is more expensive, it offers certain advantages, such as not causing vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) or circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPVs)[2][5].

Market Value and Demand

The global demand for IPV is substantial, with a market value projected to increase significantly by 2031. However, the high cost per dose of IPV (around $2.8 per dose) compared to OPV (between $0.12 to $0.17 per dose) can impact market growth[1][4].

Funding and Budgets

Global polio eradication efforts are heavily funded, with the current budget for the 2022-2026 Strategic Plan standing at $4.8 billion, of which $3.3 billion has been pledged. These funds support the procurement and distribution of IPV and OPV[3].

Health Economic Analysis

A health economic analysis highlights the complexities of vaccine options for polio eradication. The model shows that if OPV-using countries revert to trivalent OPV (tOPV) and end IPV use, it could result in the lowest anticipated annual polio cases and lowest costs. However, this scenario also poses risks, such as the ongoing threat of importation of live polioviruses if any countries continue to use OPV[2].

Key Players

The IPV market is dominated by several major players, including GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Astellas Pharma, Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd., and Pfizer Inc. These companies play a crucial role in the development, production, and distribution of IPV[1].

Regional Dynamics

Asia-Pacific

This region includes countries with significant polio burdens and those actively working towards polio eradication. The demand for IPV in this region is driven by ongoing vaccination campaigns and public health initiatives[1].

Middle East and Africa

These regions face challenges such as conflict, infrastructure issues, and vaccine hesitancy, which impact the effectiveness of polio eradication efforts and the demand for IPV[1].

Future Outlook

Polio Eradication Endgame

The eventual withdrawal of bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine (bOPV) and the transition to IPV-only schedules in some countries will shape the future market. Strategies to mitigate risks to vaccine manufacturers and ensure continuous supply are being explored[3].

Public Awareness and Vaccine Acceptance

The COVID-19 pandemic has increased public awareness of the lifesaving effects of vaccines, which could positively impact the acceptance and demand for IPV in polio-endemic countries[4].

Challenges in Immunization Programs

Complexity of Immunization Programs

Coordinating healthcare providers, legislators, and communities is essential for implementing comprehensive immunization programs that include IPV. The complexity of these programs can hinder broad IPV penetration[1].

Cold Chain Infrastructure

Ensuring the quality and accessibility of IPV requires robust cold chain infrastructure, which can be a challenge in areas with limited resources[1].

Conclusion

The IPV market is poised for growth, driven by ongoing global polio eradication efforts and routine immunization programs. However, it faces significant challenges, including high production costs, regulatory hurdles, competition from OPV, vaccine hesitancy, and infrastructure constraints. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for stakeholders to navigate the market effectively and ensure continued progress towards polio eradication.

Key Takeaways

  • The global IPV market is projected to grow from USD 10.00 billion in 2023 to USD 14.07 billion by 2031.
  • High production costs and regulatory difficulties are major restraints.
  • Competition from OPV and vaccine hesitancy impact market growth.
  • Robust cold chain infrastructure is essential for maintaining vaccine potency.
  • Public health initiatives and funding play a critical role in market dynamics.

FAQs

What is the projected growth rate of the global IPV market?

The global IPV market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 5.1% from 2024 to 2031[1].

Why is the cost of IPV higher than OPV?

IPV production involves intricate procedures and strict quality control standards, driving up costs[1].

What are the main challenges in implementing IPV immunization programs?

Challenges include high production costs, regulatory difficulties, competition from OPV, vaccine hesitancy, and infrastructure constraints[1].

Which regions are most affected by polio and require significant IPV distribution?

The Asia-Pacific and Middle East and Africa regions are most affected and require significant IPV distribution efforts[1].

How does vaccine hesitancy impact the IPV market?

Vaccine hesitancy can lower demand for IPV, particularly in areas where misinformation and mistrust in vaccines are prevalent[1][4].

Sources

  1. Verified Market Research: Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine Market Size, Forecast.
  2. CDC: Health economic analysis of vaccine options for the polio endgame.
  3. UNICEF: Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccines: Supply and Demand Update.
  4. Coherent Market Insights: IPV Vaccines Market Size, Trends and Forecast to 2031.
  5. Oxford Academic: Modeling the Dynamics of Oral Poliovirus Vaccine Cessation.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.