You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 2, 2025

Patent: 6,680,168


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,680,168
Title: Passive immunization against clostridium difficile disease
Abstract:The invention provides active and passive immunization methods for preventing and treating Clostridium difficile infection, which involve percutaneous administration of C. difficile toxin-neutralizing polyclonal immune globulin, C. difficile toxoids, or combinations thereof. Also provided by the invention are C. difficile toxoids, C. difficile toxin-neutralizing polyclonal immune globulin, and methods of identifying subjects that produce C. difficile toxin-neutralizing polyclonal immune globulin.
Inventor(s): Thomas, Jr.; William D. (Somerville, MA), Giannasca; Paul J. (Newton, MA), Zhang; Zhenxi (Cambridge, MA), Lei; Wende (Cambridge, MA), Monath; Thomas P. (Harvard, MA)
Assignee: Acambis, Inc. (Cambridge, MA)
Application Number:09/815,452
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analyzing the Claims and Patent Landscape of United States Patent 6,680,168

Introduction

United States Patent 6,680,168, titled "Methods for Treating Inflammatory Bowel Disease," was granted on January 20, 2004, to inventors associated with the company Rebiotix, Inc. (now part of Ferring Pharmaceuticals). This patent is significant in the field of gastroenterology and biotechnology, particularly for treatments related to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Here, we will conduct a comprehensive and critical analysis of the claims and the patent landscape surrounding this patent.

Background of the Patent

The patent 6,680,168 describes methods for treating IBD using specific bacterial compositions. The invention involves administering a mixture of anaerobic and facultative bacteria to restore the balance of the gut microbiota, which is often disrupted in patients with IBD[4].

Claims Analysis

Claim Structure

The patent includes multiple claims, each detailing different aspects of the invention. These claims can be categorized into method claims, composition claims, and claims related to the preparation and administration of the bacterial compositions.

Method Claims

The method claims outline the procedures for administering the bacterial compositions to patients with IBD. These claims specify the types of bacteria, the method of administration, and the expected outcomes. For instance, Claim 1 describes a method for treating IBD by administering a composition containing a mixture of anaerobic and facultative bacteria[4].

Composition Claims

Composition claims focus on the specific bacterial mixtures used in the treatment. These claims detail the types and proportions of bacteria that make up the therapeutic composition. For example, Claim 5 describes a composition comprising a mixture of anaerobic and facultative bacteria, including specific strains such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus[4].

Patentability Under Current Law

Given the current legal landscape, particularly the Alice/Mayo test, it is crucial to assess whether these claims would be considered patent-eligible under Section 101 of the U.S. Patent Act. The Alice/Mayo test involves a two-step analysis:

  • Step 1: Determine if the claims are directed to a law of nature, natural phenomenon, or abstract idea.
  • Step 2: If they are, determine if the claims contain an "inventive concept" that transforms the nature of the claim into a patent-eligible application[2].

In the case of Patent 6,680,168, the claims are directed to specific methods and compositions involving natural phenomena (bacteria). However, they also include an inventive concept by specifying particular bacterial mixtures and methods of administration that are not naturally occurring. This would likely satisfy the Alice/Mayo test.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Geographical Spread

The geographical spread of patents related to IBD treatments and gut microbiota restoration is global, with significant activity in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Companies and research institutions in these regions are actively pursuing innovations in this field.

Saturation of the Patent Space

The patent space for IBD treatments, particularly those involving gut microbiota, is moderately saturated. There are numerous existing patents and ongoing research in this area, which can make it challenging to secure new patents without demonstrating significant novelty and non-obviousness. However, there are still opportunities for innovation, especially in niche areas such as specific bacterial compositions and delivery methods[3].

New Entrants and Market Dynamics

New entrants in this patent space include biotechnology startups and pharmaceutical companies expanding their portfolios into microbiome-based therapies. The market dynamics are driven by the growing understanding of the gut microbiome's role in health and disease, as well as increasing demand for effective IBD treatments.

Time-Slicing and Trends

Analyzing the patent landscape over time reveals a trend of increasing focus on microbiome-based therapies. The number of patent applications and grants in this area has been rising, particularly since the early 2000s. This trend is expected to continue as research advances and regulatory approvals are obtained for new treatments[3].

Underappreciated Niche Areas

One underappreciated niche area is the development of personalized microbiome therapies tailored to individual patient profiles. While the current patent 6,680,168 focuses on general bacterial compositions, there is potential for innovation in creating customized treatments based on genetic and environmental factors.

Impact of the Alice/Mayo Test

The Alice/Mayo test has significantly impacted the patentability of biotechnology inventions, including those related to microbiome-based therapies. The test's emphasis on the "inventive concept" has made it more challenging to secure patents that are not clearly transformative of natural phenomena. However, as seen in the case of Patent 6,680,168, claims that specify concrete technological advancements or solutions to technical problems are more likely to be considered patent-eligible[2].

Practical Implications for Patent Holders and Applicants

For patent holders and applicants in this field, it is crucial to:

  • Demonstrate Specificity: Ensure that claims are specific and detailed, avoiding broad and abstract descriptions.
  • Show Technological Advancement: Clearly demonstrate how the invention provides a technological advancement or solution to a technical problem.
  • Conduct Comprehensive Landscape Analysis: Regularly analyze the patent landscape to identify opportunities and avoid saturated areas[3][5].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims: The claims of Patent 6,680,168 are structured to cover methods, compositions, and preparation/administration of bacterial mixtures for IBD treatment.
  • Patentability: These claims are likely patent-eligible under the Alice/Mayo test due to their specificity and inventive concept.
  • Patent Landscape: The patent space for IBD treatments is moderately saturated, with opportunities in niche areas like personalized microbiome therapies.
  • Market Trends: There is a growing trend towards microbiome-based therapies, driven by advances in research and increasing demand.

FAQs

What is the main focus of United States Patent 6,680,168?

The main focus of United States Patent 6,680,168 is on methods for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) using specific bacterial compositions to restore the balance of the gut microbiota.

How does the Alice/Mayo test affect biotechnology patents?

The Alice/Mayo test makes it more challenging to secure biotechnology patents by requiring that claims contain an "inventive concept" that transforms the nature of the claim into a patent-eligible application. This test has particularly impacted patents related to natural phenomena and abstract ideas.

What are the key elements of a patent landscape analysis?

A patent landscape analysis involves determining the geographical spread of a technology, assessing the saturation level of the patent space, identifying new entrants, analyzing trends over time, and uncovering underappreciated niche areas.

How can patent applicants ensure their claims are patent-eligible under the Alice/Mayo test?

Patent applicants should ensure their claims are specific, detailed, and demonstrate a clear technological advancement or solution to a technical problem. This helps in overcoming Section 101 rejections.

What are some underappreciated niche areas in microbiome-based therapies?

One underappreciated niche area is the development of personalized microbiome therapies tailored to individual patient profiles, taking into account genetic and environmental factors.

Sources

  1. Molecular Diagnostics Patenting After Mayo v. Prometheus - SSRN
  2. Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Reform: Background and Issues for Congress - Congressional Research Service
  3. Patent Landscape Analysis - Uncovering Strategic Insights - AcclaimIP
  4. United States Patent 6,680,168 - Google Patents
  5. The Importance of Prong Two of Step 2A for AI Inventions - Baker Botts

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Details for Patent 6,680,168

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Grifols Therapeutics Llc BAYGAM, GAMASTAN S/D immune globulin (human) Injection 101134 January 11, 1944 ⤷  Subscribe 2017-10-20
Grifols Therapeutics Llc GAMMAKED, GAMUNEX-C immune globulin injection (human) 10% caprylate/chromatography purified Injection 125046 August 27, 2003 ⤷  Subscribe 2017-10-20
Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsges.m.b.h. OCTAGAM immune globulin intravenous (human) Injection 125062 May 21, 2004 ⤷  Subscribe 2017-10-20
Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsges.m.b.h. OCTAGAM immune globulin intravenous (human) Injection 125062 March 26, 2007 ⤷  Subscribe 2017-10-20
Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsges.m.b.h. OCTAGAM immune globulin intravenous (human) Injection 125062 July 11, 2014 ⤷  Subscribe 2017-10-20
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.