You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 26, 2024

TRASYLOL Drug Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Tradename: TRASYLOL
Recent Litigation for TRASYLOL

Identify key patents and potential future biosimilar entrants

District Court Litigation
Case NameDate
DNA Genotek Inc. v. Spectrum Solutions LLC2023-06-14
JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS IRELAND LIMITED v. LUPIN LTD.2023-01-19
Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Avadel CNS Pharmaceuticals, LLC2021-11-10

See all TRASYLOL litigation

PTAB Litigation
PetitionerDate
2013-07-15

See all TRASYLOL litigation

Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. General brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for TRASYLOL Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for TRASYLOL Derived from Company Disclosures

No patents found based on company disclosures

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for TRASYLOL Derived from Patent Text Search

These patents were obtained by searching patent claims

TRASYLOL Market Analysis and Financial Projection Experimental

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Biologic Drug: Trasylol

Introduction

Trasylol, also known as aprotinin, is a biologic drug that was once widely used to reduce blood loss and the need for blood transfusions during surgical procedures, particularly coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, its market dynamics and financial trajectory have been significantly impacted by various factors, including clinical trials, regulatory actions, and market competition.

Historical Use and Mechanism

Trasylol was marketed by Bayer Pharmaceuticals and was approved for use in the 1990s. It works by inhibiting the activity of certain proteolytic enzymes, thereby reducing fibrinolysis and blood loss during surgeries[4].

Market Performance Pre-Crisis

Before the crisis, Trasylol was a significant contributor to Bayer's pharmaceutical portfolio. In the early 2000s, it was part of the robust growth seen in Bayer's Pharmaceutical segment, which included other successful drugs like Yasmin and Nexavar[2].

Clinical Trials and Safety Concerns

The market trajectory of Trasylol took a drastic turn with the publication of the Blood conservation using antifibrinolytics: A randomized trial in a cardiac surgery population (BART) study in May 2008. This study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, showed an increased risk of death associated with Trasylol compared to other antifibrinolytic agents like aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid[4].

Regulatory Actions

Following the BART study, Bayer suspended the global marketing of Trasylol in November 2007, pending the final results of the study. Subsequently, Bayer notified the FDA of their intent to remove all remaining supplies of Trasylol from hospital pharmacies and warehouses. Although Trasylol is no longer available for general purchase in the U.S., it can still be accessed under a special treatment protocol as an investigational drug[4].

Financial Impact

The suspension and eventual removal of Trasylol from the market had a significant financial impact on Bayer. The loss of Trasylol revenue contributed to a decline in the company's pharmaceutical sales, particularly in the segment that included Trasylol. This decline was offset to some extent by the strong performance of other drugs like Yasmin and Nexavar, but it still affected the overall financial performance of Bayer's Pharmaceutical division[2].

Market Dynamics Post-Crisis

The removal of Trasylol from the market created a void in the antifibrinolytic drugs segment, which was filled by other drugs such as tranexamic acid and aminocaproic acid. These alternatives have seen increased adoption and have driven the growth of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs market, particularly in regions like North America, Europe, and the Asia Pacific[1].

Competitive Landscape

The anti-fibrinolytic drugs market is now dominated by other players and products. Companies like Pfizer Inc., Sanofi SA, Akorn, Inc, Cadila Healthcare Ltd., and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited are key players in this market. The market is driven by the rising frequency of road accidents, increasing usage in oral bleeding treatments, and growing R&D investments in hemophilia products[1].

Financial Trajectory

The financial trajectory of Trasylol itself is no longer a significant factor in the pharmaceutical market, given its removal from general use. However, the lessons learned from the Trasylol saga have influenced the development and regulatory approval processes for other biologic drugs. The emphasis on rigorous clinical trials and safety monitoring has become more pronounced, affecting the financial planning and risk assessment for biologic drug development[4].

Regional Impact

The impact of Trasylol's removal was felt globally, but particularly in regions where it was widely used, such as North America and Europe. These regions have since seen a shift towards other antifibrinolytic agents, which has driven market growth in these areas[1].

Key Trends and Drivers

The current market trends in the anti-fibrinolytic drugs segment are driven by the growing adoption of these drugs in treating menorrhagia, oral bleeding, and other conditions. The increasing investments in R&D for hemophilia products and the rising incidence of trauma and bleeding disorders also contribute to market growth[1].

Conclusion

The story of Trasylol serves as a cautionary tale in the biologic drug market, highlighting the importance of rigorous clinical trials and safety monitoring. While Trasylol is no longer a market player, its legacy has shaped the current landscape of anti-fibrinolytic drugs, emphasizing the need for robust safety data and regulatory compliance.

Key Takeaways

  • Trasylol was removed from the market due to safety concerns highlighted by clinical trials.
  • The drug's removal significantly impacted Bayer's pharmaceutical sales.
  • Other antifibrinolytic agents have filled the market gap left by Trasylol.
  • The anti-fibrinolytic drugs market is driven by rising road accidents, oral bleeding treatments, and R&D investments in hemophilia products.
  • Regulatory actions and safety monitoring are crucial in the biologic drug market.

FAQs

What was Trasylol used for?

Trasylol, also known as aprotinin, was used to reduce blood loss and the need for blood transfusions during surgical procedures, particularly coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)[4].

Why was Trasylol removed from the market?

Trasylol was removed from the market due to clinical trials showing an increased risk of death associated with its use compared to other antifibrinolytic agents[4].

What are the current market drivers for anti-fibrinolytic drugs?

The current market drivers include the rising frequency of road accidents, increasing usage in oral bleeding treatments, and growing R&D investments in hemophilia products[1].

Which regions are significant for the anti-fibrinolytic drugs market?

North America, Europe, the Asia Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East and Africa are significant regions for the anti-fibrinolytic drugs market[1].

What are the key players in the anti-fibrinolytic drugs market?

Key players include Pfizer Inc., Sanofi SA, Akorn, Inc, Cadila Healthcare Ltd., and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited[1].

Sources

  1. Expert Market Research: Anti-fibrinolytic Drugs Market Share, Trends 2024-2032.
  2. S&P Global: Q3 Operating Profit up 6.9% Y/Y as Bayer Schering Confirms Suspension of Global Marketing for Trasylol.
  3. Maximize Market Research: Biological Drugs Market: Global Industry Analysis.
  4. FDA: Aprotinin Injection (marketed as Trasylol) Information.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.