CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ETODOLAC
✉ Email this page to a colleague
All Clinical Trials for etodolac
Trial ID | Title | Status | Sponsor | Phase | Start Date | Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCT00151736 ↗ | Safety and Efficacy of SDX-101 (R-Etodolac) in Combination With Chlorambucil, and That of Chlorambucil Alone, in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) | Terminated | Cephalon | Phase 2 | 2004-09-01 | This is a Phase 2, multi-center, open label, randomized clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficiency of SDX-101 in combination with chlorambucil (CLB) and chlorambucil alone in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL) patients. The study treatment period will be approximately 24-26 weeks with a follow-up period of approximately 8 weeks. Following the end of treatment, patients with a confirmed complete response, partial response or stable disease will be followed for up to 2 years to assess time to disease progression. Approximately 80 patients with documented diagnosis of B-cell CLL by standard clinical and immunophenotyping criteria will be enrolled into the SDX-101-03 study. This study is being conducted in the following European countries: France, Germany, Poland, Sweden and the United Kingdom. |
NCT00293111 ↗ | Safety and Efficacy of SDX-101 (R-Etodolac) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM) | Terminated | Cephalon | Phase 2 | 2002-02-01 | An Open Label, Multi-Center, Phase II Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of SDX-101 (R-Etodolac) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM) |
NCT00317447 ↗ | The Efficacy of Oral Steroids in the Treatment of Acute Sciatica | Completed | Kaiser Permanente | Phase 3 | 2002-02-01 | Sciatica (lumbosacral radiculopathy) is a common diagnosis in primary care, occurring in approximately one percent of all patients with acute low back pain. (1, 2) Traditional treatment generally involves pain control (acetominophen, NSAID's, or narcotics), activity as tolerated, and time. (1, 3-8 ) The general consensus is that fifty percent of patients with sciatica recover within six weeks, and that ninety percent are better in twelve weeks.(4, 8) Those patients with intractable pain or progressive neurologic symptoms usually receive epidural steroid injections and, if necessary, decompressive laminectomy or discectomy. (2, 8, 9) Low back pain and sciatica result in tremendous losses to our society in terms of decreased productivity and cost of treatment. (1, 12) Oral steroids are inexpensive and relatively safe medications that, if effective in reducing the pain and disability associated with sciatica, could improve the quality of patients' lives, and result in significant cost savings to society at large. We hypothesize that the use of oral steroids to treat acute sciatica will speed patients' recovery as measured by: changes in physical findings, rates of return to work and activities of daily living, pain and disability assessment scores, and decreases in the use of narcotic and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID's), and in the need for epidural injection or surgical intervention. |
>Trial ID | >Title | >Status | >Sponsor | >Phase | >Start Date | >Summary |
Clinical Trial Conditions for etodolac
Condition Name
Clinical Trial Locations for etodolac
Trials by Country
Clinical Trial Progress for etodolac
Clinical Trial Phase
Clinical Trial Sponsors for etodolac
Sponsor Name