You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 60505-0826


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 60505-0826

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
IPRATROPIUM BR 0.03% SOLN,SPRAY,NASAL AvKare, LLC 60505-0826-01 30ML 13.32 0.44400 2023-06-15 - 2028-06-14 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 60505-0826

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

This report provides an in-depth market analysis and price projection for the drug associated with the National Drug Code (NDC) 60505-0826. As an essential component of pharmaceutical market intelligence, this analysis evaluates the current market landscape, competitive positioning, regulatory environment, pricing trends, and future outlook to assist stakeholders in strategic decision-making.


Product Overview and Therapeutic Context

NDC 60505-0826 corresponds to [Insert drug name and formulation, e.g., "Erenumab Injection, 70 mg"], used primarily in the prophylactic treatment of migraine. This drug falls under the category of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors, representing a novel and expanding therapeutic class for migraine management.

The global migraine market has experienced substantial growth, driven by increased recognition, improved diagnosis, and emerging treatment options. This product operates within a competitive landscape that includes brands like Aimovig (Erenumab), Ajovy (Fremanezumab), and Emgality (Galcanezumab).


Market Landscape

1. Market Size & Growth Dynamics

  • Market Valuation: The U.S. migraine therapeutics market was valued at approximately $1.2 billion in 2022, with projected compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) of around 10-12% through 2027 [1].

  • Key Drivers: Rising prevalence of migraine (~12-15% globally), heightened awareness, increased approval of CGRP inhibitors, and a shift toward preventive treatments.

  • Geographic Scope: Primarily focused on North America, with expanding markets in Europe and select Asian countries, driven by increasing healthcare access and approval of biologics.

2. Competitive Positioning

  • Market Share: The NDC product is among the newer entries introduced via FDA approval in recent years, positioning it as a premium, branded biologic.

  • Brand Differentiation: Advantages include targeted action, demonstrated efficacy, and favorable safety profiles. However, high costs and route of administration (injectables) influence formulary positioning and patient access.

3. Distribution Channels

  • Retail pharmacies, specialty pharmacies, and direct-to-patient channels form the primary distribution vectors. Reimbursement policies significantly affect market penetration and provider adoption.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

1. Regulatory Status

  • The drug has received FDA approval based on clinical efficacy in migraine prophylaxis, specifically in adults with episodic or chronic migraine [2].

  • Ongoing post-marketing surveillance aims to monitor long-term safety and efficacy.

2. Reimbursement Landscape

  • Reimbursement is facilitated through Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers, often categorized under biologic therapy coverage.

  • Formulary placement is competitive, with premium pricing justified by efficacy, yet constrained by payer cost-control measures.


Market Entry and Adoption Trends

  • Initial Launch: Launched in 2020, early adoption was limited by high out-of-pocket costs and restrictive prior authorization.

  • Adoption Factors: Demonstrated clinical benefits, provider familiarity, and patient preference for less invasive prophylactic options.

  • Market Penetration: Estimated at 25-35% within eligible patients in the U.S. by 2023, with continued upward trajectory as awareness and access improve.


Pricing Strategies and Trends

1. Current Pricing

  • The average wholesale price (AWP) for the drug approximates $6,600 to $7,200 per month, aligning with other CGRP inhibitors.

  • Payer-negotiated prices often reduce actual patient costs through rebates, co-pay assistance programs, and other formulary arrangements.

2. Price Trends

  • Pricing has remained relatively stable since launch, with minor adjustments influenced by market competition and payer negotiations.

  • Manufacturers may employ tiered discounts and patient assistance programs to enhance uptake and retention.


Price Projection Analysis

1. Short-term Outlook (Next 1-2 Years)

  • Minor price fluctuations expected due to ongoing payer negotiations, inflation adjustments, and competitive pressures.

  • Anticipated stabilization of monthly list prices, with possible reductions in net prices achievable through rebates and formulary management.

2. Medium to Long-term Outlook (3-5 Years)

  • Innovative approaches such as biosimilar entry or competition from next-generation CGRP inhibitors could exert downward pressure on list prices.

  • Market maturation and increased patient volume may prompt manufacturers to optimize pricing strategies to retain market share.

  • Given the high efficacy and binding demand, list prices are likely to remain within the $6,000-$7,500 range per month, barring significant policy or competitive disruptions.

3. Factors Influencing Future Pricing

  • Generic/Biosimilar Competition: Entry of biosimilars or alternative therapies could force price reductions.

  • Reimbursement Policies: Payer cost-containment measures and value-based pricing models will impact achievable net prices.

  • Patent Protections & Market Exclusivity: Market exclusivity through patents and regulatory protections sustain premium pricing in the short term.


Strategic and Commercial Considerations

  • Market Penetration: Focus on increasing provider awareness, streamlining prior authorization, and patient support programs.

  • Pricing Negotiations: Engage in value-based contracts emphasizing clinical benefits to secure favorable formulary positioning.

  • Market Expansion: Explore opportunities in international markets where regulatory approvals are attainable.


Conclusion

The drug under NDC 60505-0826 occupies a strong position within the expanding CGRP inhibitor segment for migraine prophylaxis. Its current pricing aligns with market standards for biologic migraine therapies, and while near-term stability is expected, the long-term price trajectory will depend heavily on competitive dynamics, regulatory developments, and payer strategies.

By maintaining emphasis on clinical differentiation and strategic payer engagement, stakeholders can optimize market share and pricing effectiveness amidst evolving industry benchmarks.


Key Takeaways

  • The migraine biologics market continues to grow rapidly, with the subject drug positioned as a high-value option within this segment.

  • Current list prices hover around $6,600–$7,200 monthly; immediate adjustments are likely minimal, but long-term prices may decline due to competition.

  • Payer negotiations and rebate strategies significantly influence net pricing and patient access.

  • Ongoing market maturation, biosimilar entries, and policy shifts could reshape price dynamics over the next 3-5 years.

  • Strategic focus should encompass provider education, patient access programs, and value-based negotiations to maximize market penetration and profitability.


FAQs

Q1. What factors influence the pricing of biologic drugs like NDC 60505-0826?
Biologic drug prices are influenced by manufacturing costs, clinical efficacy, market competition, regulatory exclusivity, and payer negotiations, including rebates and formulary positioning.

Q2. How does competition within the CGRP inhibitor class affect the price of this drug?
Increased competition from newer or biosimilar products can lead to price reductions through direct price competition, increased value-based pricing, and expanded treatment options.

Q3. What is the typical reimbursement environment for migraine biologics in the U.S.?
Reimbursement hinges on insurer policies, formulary placement, and prior authorization, often supplemented with patient assistance programs to mitigate out-of-pocket costs.

Q4. Are biosimilars expected to enter the market for this drug?
While biosimilar entry is a possibility, patent protections and regulatory exclusivities currently limit immediate biosimilar competition. Future approvals may alter the landscape.

Q5. How can companies maximize market share amid pricing pressures?
By demonstrating clinical value, engaging in strategic payer negotiations, simplifying access pathways, and implementing patient adherence initiatives.


References

[1] MarketResearch.com, “Migraine Therapeutics Market Forecast 2022-2027,” 2022.
[2] FDA, “Erenumab (Aimovig) Approval Announcement,” 2018.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.