2017-10-31 |
1 |
|
United States Patent Nos. 8,481,598 (“the
’598 patent”), 8,865,937 (“the ’937 patent”), and RE43,879… infringed United States
Patent Nos. 8,481,598, 8,865,937, and RE43,879 by submitting ANDA…products
before United States Patent Nos. 8,481,598 and RE43,879 expire, would
…expiration date of United
States Patent Nos. 8,481,598, 8,865,937, and RE43,879, including any
…Page 16 of 19 PageID: 16
States Patent Nos. 8,481,598, 8,865,937, and RE43,879 expire, including |
External link to document |
2021-06-08 |
455 |
Opinion |
the three asserted patents: United States Patents No. 8,481,598 (the “’598
Patent”) and No. RE43, 879… Legal Standard
A patent claim is that “portion of the patent document that defines the scope…of
levomilnacipran.” ’598 Patent at 11:38–39 (emphasis added). The patent defines the terms
“effective…Rather, a POSA reading the patent as a whole
would understand that the patent is directed at administering…which is how
the ’598 Patent refers to the dosage amounts. See, e.g., ’598 Patent at 3:11–13, 3:17–19, |
External link to document |