Litigation Details for Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. (Fed. Cir. 2024)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. (Fed. Cir. 2024)
Docket | ⤷ Sign Up | Date Filed | 2024-01-29 |
Court | Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit | Date Terminated | |
Cause | Assigned To | ||
Jury Demand | Referred To | ||
Patents | 7,115,634; 7,601,740; 9,566,271 | ||
Link to Docket | External link to docket |
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.
Details for Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. (Fed. Cir. 2024)
Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
---|---|---|---|---|
0000-00-00 | External link to document | |||
2024-05-29 | 13 | ABBREVIATIONS ’740 patent U.S. Patent No. 7,601,740 (Appx79-108) ’271 patent …ASSERTED CLAIMS Asserted claim 26 of U.S. Patent No. 7,601,740 depends from claim 22: 22. A compound having… U.S. Patent No. 9,566,271 (Appx109-135) ’462 patent U.S. Patent No. 7,732,462 ’561 application… second patent on subject matter not patentably distinct from the claims of the first patent, … [a] patent… a later-filed patent that are not patentably distinct from the earlier[-]filed patent.” SimpleAir, Inc | External link to document | |
2024-03-29 | 9 | Rye, NH (US); 7,115,634 B2 10/2006 Thurieau et al. … U.S. Patent No. 9,566,271 (“the ’271 patent”) cannot be an obviousness-type double patenting (“OTDP…challenged ’740 patent and the OTDP reference ’271 patent. Appx065. Claim 26 of the ’740 patent is directed…whereas the ’740 patent received a 980-day patent term adjustment (“PTA”), the ’271 patent does not have… “A later patent claim is not patentably distinct from an earlier patent claim if the later | External link to document | |
>Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |