You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 10,758,616


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,758,616
Title:Pre-mixed, ready-to-use pharmaceutical compositions
Abstract: Provided herein are ready-to-use premixed pharmaceutical compositions of nicardipine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt and methods for use in treating cardiovascular and cerebrovascular conditions.
Inventor(s): Duncan; Michelle Renee (Glenview, IL), Gupta; Supriya (Waverly, IA), Haas; David Hartley (Fremont, CA), Nenonene; Norma V. (Skokie, IL), Zamiri; Camellia (Fremont, CA)
Assignee: EKR Therapeutics, Inc. (Cary, NC)
Application Number:16/010,898
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 10,758,616: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, understanding its scope and claims is crucial for determining its validity, enforceability, and potential impact on the market. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 10,758,616, providing a thorough analysis of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape.

Understanding Patent Scope and Claims

Before diving into the specifics of Patent 10,758,616, it is essential to understand what patent scope and claims entail.

Patent Scope

The scope of a patent refers to the breadth and depth of protection it offers. It is defined by the claims, which outline the specific features and limitations of the invention. A broader scope means the patent covers a wider range of variations and applications, while a narrower scope limits the protection to a more specific implementation[3].

Patent Claims

Patent claims are the legal definitions of the invention and are the most critical part of a patent. They define what the inventor considers to be the novel and non-obvious aspects of the invention. Claims can be independent or dependent, with independent claims standing alone and dependent claims referring back to an independent claim[3].

Patent 10,758,616 Overview

To analyze Patent 10,758,616, one must first identify the key elements of the patent.

Title and Abstract

The title and abstract provide a brief overview of the invention. For example, if the patent is related to a technological innovation, the title and abstract will outline the main purpose and functionality of the invention.

Background of the Invention

This section explains the context and prior art related to the invention. It helps in understanding the problem the invention solves and how it differs from existing solutions.

Summary of the Invention

This section provides a concise description of the invention, including its main components and how they interact.

Detailed Description of the Invention

Here, the inventor provides a detailed explanation of the invention, including drawings and diagrams if applicable.

Claims

The claims section is where the legal boundaries of the invention are defined. Each claim must be carefully crafted to ensure it is novel, non-obvious, and useful.

Analyzing the Claims of Patent 10,758,616

To analyze the claims of Patent 10,758,616, you would typically follow these steps:

Identify Independent Claims

Independent claims are the foundation of the patent and define the invention without referencing other claims. These claims are crucial as they set the broadest scope of protection.

Analyze Dependent Claims

Dependent claims build upon independent claims and add additional limitations. These claims can help in narrowing down the scope to specific embodiments of the invention.

Evaluate Claim Language

The language used in the claims is critical. Terms such as "comprising," "consisting of," and "including" have different legal implications. For instance, "comprising" is often used to indicate that the invention includes the listed elements but may also include others[4].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the broader patent landscape is essential for assessing the significance and potential impact of Patent 10,758,616.

Prior Art Search

Conducting a thorough prior art search using tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and international databases such as those provided by the European Patent Office (EPO) and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), helps in identifying similar patents and determining the novelty of the invention[1][4].

Classification and Citation Data

Using tools like the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) database and the Common Citation Document (CCD) application, you can find relevant classification schemes and citation data that relate to the patent. This helps in understanding how the patent fits into the existing technological landscape[1][4].

International Patent Offices

Checking if similar patents exist in other countries through databases like PATENTSCOPE and national patent offices' databases ensures that the invention is not already protected elsewhere[1].

Tools and Resources for Patent Analysis

Several tools and resources are available to aid in the analysis of Patent 10,758,616:

USPTO Resources

  • Patent Public Search: A modern web-based patent search application that provides enhanced access to prior art[1].
  • Global Dossier: Allows access to file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices[1].
  • Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs): Provide local search resources and training in patent search techniques[1].

International Databases

  • PATENTSCOPE: Provides full-text search of published international patent applications and machine translations for some documents[1][4].
  • European Patent Office (EPO) databases: Offers access to Europe's patent databases and machine translations of European patents[1].

Data Sets and Documentation

  • Patent Claims Research Dataset: Contains detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications, which can be used to analyze claim-level statistics and document-level statistics[3].

Practical Steps for Conducting a Preliminary Patent Search

To conduct a preliminary search for Patent 10,758,616, follow these steps:

Step 1: Define the Search Scope

Identify the key terms and concepts related to the invention. Use these terms to construct a search query.

Step 2: Use Appropriate Databases

Utilize databases such as the USPTO's Patent Public Search, PATENTSCOPE, and other international databases to search for prior art.

Step 3: Apply Classification Schemes

Use classification schemes like the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) to narrow down the search results to relevant categories[4].

Step 4: Analyze Search Results

Carefully review the search results to identify similar patents and determine the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention.

Challenges and Considerations

Analyzing a patent's scope and claims comes with several challenges:

Complexity of Claim Language

The language used in patent claims can be complex and nuanced, requiring careful interpretation to understand the full scope of protection.

Global Patent Landscape

Ensuring that the invention is novel and non-obvious on a global scale requires extensive searching across multiple international databases.

Legal and Policy Considerations

Understanding the legal and policy implications of patent claims is crucial. For instance, the concept of a small claims patent court, as studied by ACUS, could impact how patent disputes are resolved[2].

Key Takeaways

  • Understand the Claims: The claims section of a patent defines the legal boundaries of the invention.
  • Conduct Thorough Searches: Use various databases and tools to ensure the invention is novel and non-obvious.
  • Global Perspective: Consider the global patent landscape to avoid infringement and ensure protection.
  • Use Advanced Tools: Utilize resources like the Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and PATENTSCOPE to enhance your search capabilities.
  • Legal Considerations: Be aware of legal and policy changes that could affect patent enforcement and disputes.

FAQs

Q: How do I conduct a preliminary patent search?

A: Start by defining the search scope, use appropriate databases like the USPTO's Patent Public Search and PATENTSCOPE, apply classification schemes, and carefully analyze the search results[1][4].

Q: What is the importance of claim language in a patent?

A: Claim language is critical as it defines the legal boundaries of the invention. Terms like "comprising" and "consisting of" have different legal implications and must be carefully interpreted[4].

Q: How can I determine if a patent is novel and non-obvious?

A: Conduct a thorough prior art search using various databases and tools to identify similar patents and determine the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention[1][4].

Q: What resources are available for analyzing patent claims?

A: Resources include the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, PATENTSCOPE, and the Patent Claims Research Dataset[1][3][4].

Q: How does the global patent landscape impact patent analysis?

A: Ensuring that the invention is novel and non-obvious on a global scale requires searching across multiple international databases to avoid infringement and ensure protection[1].

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents. Retrieved from https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. ACUS - U.S. Patent Small Claims Court. Retrieved from https://www.acus.gov/research-projects/us-patent-small-claims-court
  3. USPTO - Patent Claims Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  4. Clemson University - Advanced Patent Searching. Retrieved from https://clemson.libguides.com/advanced_patent_searching

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,758,616

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Chiesi CARDENE IN 0.83% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER nicardipine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 019734-004 Nov 7, 2008 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Chiesi CARDENE IN 0.86% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER nicardipine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 019734-003 Jul 31, 2008 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Chiesi CARDENE IN 4.8% DEXTROSE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER nicardipine hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INTRAVENOUS 019734-002 Jul 31, 2008 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.