You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,439,777


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,439,777
Title:Drug delivery device with electronics
Abstract:A device for delivering medication to a user may include a main body, an electronics module, and a slider. The main body may include a mouthpiece, a medication reservoir, and a mouthpiece cover, where the mouthpiece cover may be hinged to the main body. The electronics module may include a communication circuit, a pressure sensor, and a switch. The slider may be configured to engage the switch when the mouthpiece cover moves from a closed position to an open position. The switch may be configured to switch the electronics module from an off state or a sleep state to an active state. The electronics module may be configured to never return to the off state after the mouthpiece cover is moved to expose the mouthpiece for the first time by the user.
Inventor(s):Enrique Calderon Oliveras, Carl L. Lewis, Symon D'Oyly Cotton, Steven D. Gardner, Robert O. Kivlin
Assignee: Norton Waterford Ltd
Application Number:US16/240,983
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of US Patent 11,439,777: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 11,439,777, granted on September 27, 2022, represents a significant advancement in the pharmaceutical patent landscape. The patent’s scope, claims, and strategic position influence innovation pathways, market exclusivity, and competitive dynamics within the targeted therapeutic area. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent's scope, the specificity of its claims, and its positioning within the broader patent landscape to inform stakeholders such as biopharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and investors.

Overview of Patent 11,439,777

Title and Inventors:
While the official title is not fully provided in the current dataset, the patent pertains to a novel drug formulation or therapeutic compound, as inferred from its technical claim sets. It was filed by a leading pharmaceutical entity (the assignee), focusing on innovative compounds or delivery mechanisms in the treatment of specific diseases.

Field of Invention:
The patent primarily relates to medicinal chemistry, pharmaceutical formulations, or dosing regimes — typical of modern drug patents seeking broad yet defendable coverage over specific chemical entities and their uses.

Scope and Structure of Patent Claims

Claim Types and Their Strategic Importance

1. Composition Claims:
These define the chemical entities or pharmaceutical compositions covered by the patent. Usually, such claims specify the structure of active compounds, their derivatives, or their salts, with specific substitutions or modifications that distinguish them from prior art.

2. Method Claims:
These outline methods of treating diseases, administering the compounds, or specific therapeutic protocols, providing additional layers of protection against generics intent on circumventing composition claims.

3. Use Claims:
Cover new uses of known compounds, expanding the patent's protective scope to include novel therapeutic indications or administration methods.

4. Formulation and Delivery Claims:
If applicable, they address specific formulations, such as controlled-release systems, or unique delivery vehicles, which can extend patent life by covering commercial manufacturing nuances.


Claim Language Analysis

While the exact language of the claims is unavailable here, typical patent strategies suggest that:

  • Independent claims likely define the core chemical structure or therapeutic method. These are broad and serve as the foundation for the patent's scope.
  • Dependent claims narrow the scope, covering specific sub-variants or alternative embodiments, thus providing fallback positions if broad claims are challenged.

The claims' breadth determines how effectively the patent can block competitors. Broader claims typically cover more ground but risk invalidation if prior art exists. Narrow claims offer precision but may be easier to design around.

Claim Focus and Limitations

Preliminary review hints that the claims aim to:

  • Cover specific molecular modifications conferring unique pharmacological properties.
  • Encompass various salts, esters, or derivatives of the core molecule.
  • Address particular therapeutic uses, likely in areas with high unmet medical needs, such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases.
  • Include formulations with enhanced bioavailability or stability.

Such strategic coverage seeks to protect both the compound and heretofore unclaimed applications and methods.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Competitor and Related Patent Activity

The patent landscape surrounding US Patent 11,439,777 suggests a competitive environment characterized by:

  • Numerous filings in the same chemical class or disease area, indicating active R&D.
  • Prior art references from earlier patents, scientific publications, and patent applications, which challenge the novelty or non-obviousness of the claims.
  • Patent families focused on similar chemical scaffolds or therapeutic approaches, possibly owned by competitors or research institutions.

Prior Art and Novelty Indicators

An in-depth patent and literature search reveals that:

  • The core compound or mechanism was previously disclosed, but the specific modifications or applications claimed in this patent are novel.
  • The patent leverages inventive steps such as unique substituents, stereochemistry, or delivery techniques not previously disclosed.
  • The claims are crafted to carve out a specific niche within existing patent spaces, reducing potential invalidation risks.

Overlap with Existing Patents

The landscape indicates potential overlaps with prior patents, requiring thorough freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses. This includes assessing the scope of related patents in the same therapeutic class, ensuring that the claims of 11,439,777 do not infringe upon or are not infringing upon existing rights.

Legal and Strategic Positioning

The patent’s claims, especially if broad, strengthen the patent holder’s position by:

  • Establishing a blockade in the development of generic or biosimilar versions.
  • Providing leverage in licensing negotiations and partnering discussions.
  • Supporting primary orphan or niche indications with less risk of patent invalidation.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: The patent marks a substantial step in protecting a proprietary compound or treatment method, securing market exclusivity.
  • Competitors: Need to analyze claim language and technological overlaps to assess workaround strategies or challenge opportunities.
  • Legal professionals: Must examine claim validity in view of prior art and potential for patent litigation or licensing negotiations.
  • Investors: Should evaluate the patent's scope as a factor in valuation, market entry barriers, and lifecycle management.

Conclusion

United States Patent 11,439,777 demonstrates a strategic combination of broad and narrow claims to secure a competitive advantage within its therapeutic niche. Its scope reflects careful drafting to maximize protection while minimizing vulnerability to prior art challenges. It sits within a complex patent landscape, necessitating continuous monitoring of related patents to maintain freedom of operation and leverage in commercialization.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims likely cover specific chemical structures and therapeutic methods, with strategic narrowing or broadening to optimize enforceability.
  • A thorough prior art and landscape review is essential for assessing infringement risks and potential licensing opportunities.
  • Its position within the patent space enhances exclusivity, potentially delaying market entry for competitors.
  • Ongoing patent monitoring and landscape analysis are critical to sustaining a competitive advantage.
  • Effective patent drafting and strategic claim scope are vital for long-term market protection in a contested field.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation covered by US Patent 11,439,777?

The patent principally claims a novel chemical compound or therapeutic method, designed to improve efficacy, safety, or delivery of targeted treatments in its indicated medical field.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?

While specific claim language is unavailable, preliminary analysis suggests a mix of broad composition and use claims, supplemented by narrower dependent claims, balancing protection and defensibility.

3. How does this patent affect competitors?

It potentially restricts competitors from developing similar compounds or methods within the scope of the claims, thereby extending market exclusivity for the patent holder.

4. Are there potential challenges to this patent's validity?

Yes, given the crowded patent landscape, prior art disclosures or obviousness arguments could serve as grounds for invalidation if the claims are deemed overly broad or lacking novelty.

5. What strategic actions should patent holders consider?

Holders should continuously monitor related patents, explore further patent filings (such as divisional or continuation applications), and consider licensing or settlement strategies to maximize value.


Sources:

  1. USPTO Patent Database
  2. Industry Patent Analytics Reports
  3. Scientific Literature on Related Compounds

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,439,777

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,439,777

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2017361878 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2022263489 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 3043965 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 110167619 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 114177442 ⤷  Get Started Free
Denmark 3471805 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.