You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 4,297,351


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,297,351
Title: Method of manufacture and use of improved 2.beta., 16.beta.-piperidino androstanes
Abstract:New and pharmacologically useful pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salts are disclosed for the 16.beta.-monoquaternary ammonium derivatives of either the 2.beta., 16.beta.-bis-piperdino-3.alpha., 17.beta.-dihydroxy-5.alpha.-androstane 3.alpha., 17.beta.-di-lower aliphatic esters or the 2.beta., 16.beta.-bis-piperidino-3.alpha.-hydroxy-5.alpha.-androstane-3.alpha.-lowe r aliphatic esters, which salts are surprisingly relatively stable in aqueous solutions, so that they provide stable aqueous injection preparations.
Inventor(s): Carlyle; Ian C. (Hamilton, GB6), Sleigh; Thomas (Wishaw, GB6), Savage; David S. (Glasgow, GB6)
Assignee: Akzona Incorporated (Asheville, NC)
Application Number:06/194,942
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 4,297,351

Introduction

United States Patent 4,297,351 is a significant patent that has had an impact in its respective field. To analyze this patent, it is crucial to delve into its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape.

Patent Overview

Patent Number and Title

  • The patent in question is U.S. Patent 4,297,351. While the specific title is not provided in the sources, understanding the general context of the patent is essential.

Inventors and Assignees

  • Typically, patents include information about the inventors and the assignees. This data is critical for understanding the ownership and potential licensing or litigation issues associated with the patent[4].

Scope of the Patent

Claims

  • The claims section of a patent is the most critical part as it defines the boundaries of the patent protection. For U.S. Patent 4,297,351, the claims would outline what is novel and non-obvious about the invention. These claims must be specific, clear, and enabled, meaning they must teach a person with ordinary skill in the art how to make or use the invention[2].

Description and Enablement

  • The patent description must provide sufficient detail to allow someone to reproduce the invention without undue experimentation. This includes any necessary drawings, diagrams, and written descriptions[2].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent Mapping

  • A patent landscape analysis, also known as patent mapping, helps in understanding the entire landscape of a technology domain. For U.S. Patent 4,297,351, this analysis would involve identifying other patents in the same field, their legal status, expected expiry dates, and any trends or market developments[3].

Competitor Analysis

  • This analysis would reveal competitors holding similar patents, any mergers and acquisitions, in/out-licensing activities, litigation, and opposition activities. This information is vital for strategic business decisions and to minimize associated risks[3].

Legal Status and Expiry Dates

Current Status

  • The legal status of U.S. Patent 4,297,351 would indicate whether it is alive, pending, lapsed, revoked, or expired. Given the patent number, it is likely that the patent has expired, as it was issued many years ago[3].

Expiry Dates

  • The expected expiry date of a patent is crucial for planning generic entry or other business strategies. For expired patents like 4,297,351, this date would have passed, and the technology would be in the public domain[4].

Patentability Criteria

Novelty, Non-Obviousness, and Utility

  • To be patentable, an invention must meet the criteria of being new, useful, and non-obvious. The claims of U.S. Patent 4,297,351 would have been evaluated against these standards during the patent prosecution process[2].

Enablement and Written Description

  • The patent must also be enabled and include a sufficient written description to allow others to replicate the invention. This ensures that the patent contributes to the advancement of technology by disclosing the invention in a way that others can use it[2].

Prosecution History

Filing and Examination Process

  • The patent would have gone through a provisional and non-provisional application process. The U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) would have reviewed the application for patentability, which could have involved arguments and amended claims[2].

Appeals and Reexaminations

  • If there were any disputes during the prosecution, they might have been appealed to an appeal board or the U.S. court system. For example, issues related to obviousness or double patenting (ODP) could have been contested, as seen in cases like In re Cellect[1].

Impact on Market and Technology

Market Developments

  • The patent would have influenced market developments in its field. This includes any mergers and acquisitions, licensing agreements, or litigation that arose due to the patent's existence[3].

Technological Advancements

  • The invention protected by U.S. Patent 4,297,351 would have contributed to technological advancements in its domain. Understanding this impact helps in evaluating the patent's significance and its legacy in the industry.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims: The claims define the scope of protection and must be novel, non-obvious, and enabled.
  • Legal Status: Understanding the current legal status and expiry dates is crucial for business strategies.
  • Patent Landscape: Analyzing the broader patent landscape helps in identifying competitors, trends, and market developments.
  • Prosecution History: The history of the patent's prosecution can reveal challenges and disputes that arose during its granting.
  • Market and Technological Impact: The patent's influence on market and technological advancements is vital for understanding its significance.

FAQs

Q: What is the significance of the claims section in a patent?

  • The claims section is the most critical part of a patent as it defines the boundaries of the patent protection, outlining what is novel and non-obvious about the invention.

Q: How does patent landscape analysis help in understanding a patent?

  • Patent landscape analysis helps in understanding the entire landscape of a technology domain by identifying other patents, their legal status, expected expiry dates, and market trends.

Q: What are the criteria for an invention to be patentable?

  • An invention must be new, useful, and non-obvious to be patentable. It must also be enabled and include a sufficient written description.

Q: What happens if a patent application is rejected during prosecution?

  • If a patent application is rejected, the applicant can appeal the decision to an appeal board or the U.S. court system or amend the claims to address the examiner's objections.

Q: Why is the expiry date of a patent important?

  • The expiry date is important for planning generic entry or other business strategies, as it indicates when the technology will enter the public domain.

Sources

  1. In re Cellect - United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  2. Intellectual Property Protection - KU Office of Research
  3. Navigating Technological Domains with Patent Landscape Analysis - Sagacious Research
  4. Pharmaceutical drugs covered by patent 4,297,351 - Drug Patent Watch
  5. U.S. Patent Small Claims Court - Administrative Conference of the United States

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,297,351

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,297,351

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom35667/78Sep 5, 1978

International Family Members for US Patent 4,297,351

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 228728 ⤷  Subscribe
Austria 921 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 5034879 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 526270 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 1134813 ⤷  Subscribe
Germany 2962627 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.