You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 4,338,317


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,338,317
Title: Phenoxyethyl-1,2,4,-triazol-3-one antidepressants
Abstract:Phenoxyethyl substituted-1,2,4,-triazolones having antidepressant properties typified by 2-[3-[4-(3-chlorophenyl)-1-piperazinyl]propyl]-5-ethyl-4-(2-phenoxyethyl)- 2H-1,2,4-triazol-3(4H)-one are disclosed.
Inventor(s): Temple, Jr.; Davis L. (Evansville, IN), Lobeck, Jr.; Walter G. (Evansville, IN)
Assignee: Mead Johnson & Company (Evansville, IN)
Application Number:06/244,464
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 4,338,317

Introduction

When delving into the specifics of a patent, understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is crucial. This analysis will focus on United States Patent 4,338,317, providing a detailed breakdown of its key components and contextualizing it within the patent ecosystem.

Understanding Patents and Patent Searches

Before diving into the specifics of the patent, it's essential to understand how patents are searched and analyzed. The USPTO provides several tools, including the Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs), which are invaluable for conducting thorough patent searches[1].

Patent 4,338,317 Overview

To analyze the scope and claims of United States Patent 4,338,317, we need to start with the basic information about the patent.

Inventors and Assignees

Identifying the inventors and assignees is a critical first step. This information can be found in the patent document itself or through databases like the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool.

Title and Abstract

The title and abstract provide a concise overview of the invention. For example, if the patent is related to a specific chemical compound, the title and abstract would outline its composition, use, and any unique properties.

International Patent Classification (IPC)

The IPC classification helps in understanding the broader category under which the patent falls. This classification system is used internationally and aids in searching and comparing similar patents.

Claims Analysis

The claims section of a patent is perhaps the most critical part, as it defines the legal scope of the invention.

Independent and Dependent Claims

Patents typically include both independent and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims. Analyzing these claims helps in understanding the exact scope of protection granted by the patent.

Claim Construction

Claim construction involves interpreting the language of the claims to determine their meaning and scope. This process is crucial for determining infringement and validity issues. The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset can provide insights into claim-level statistics and document-level statistics, which can be useful in this analysis[3].

Scope of the Invention

The scope of the invention is defined by the claims but also influenced by the description and drawings provided in the patent.

Description and Drawings

The detailed description and drawings in the patent provide context to the claims. They explain how the invention works, its components, and any specific embodiments.

Prior Art and Novelty

Understanding the prior art cited in the patent is essential to determine the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention. Tools like the Common Citation Document (CCD) can help consolidate prior art citations from multiple offices, making this analysis more efficient[1].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Analyzing the patent landscape involves looking at related patents and applications to understand the competitive environment.

Patent Family

Using tools like Global Dossier, you can identify the patent family for a specific application, including all related applications filed at participating IP Offices. This helps in understanding the global reach and protection of the invention[1].

Office Actions and Citations

Reviewing office actions and citations can provide insights into how the patent office viewed the invention during the examination process. The Patent Examination Data System (PEDS) allows users to search, view, and download bibliographic data for publicly available patent applications, which can be useful for this analysis[1].

Examples and Case Studies

To illustrate the analysis, let's consider a hypothetical example similar to what might be found in a patent like 4,338,317.

Example: Chemical Compounds

If the patent is for a specific chemical compound, such as an antidepressant, the analysis would involve:

  • Claims Analysis: Identifying the specific chemical structure and any variations covered by the claims.
  • Scope of the Invention: Understanding how the compound is synthesized, its therapeutic use, and any specific embodiments.
  • Prior Art: Reviewing prior art to ensure the compound is novel and non-obvious.
  • Patent Landscape: Looking at other patents related to similar compounds to understand the competitive landscape.

Industry Expert Insights

Industry experts often provide valuable insights into the significance and impact of a patent.

"The claims of a patent are the heart of the invention. They define what is protected and what is not. A thorough analysis of these claims is essential for understanding the scope of the patent and its potential impact on the market," - Dr. Alan C. Marco, former Chief Economist at the USPTO[3].

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis can also provide valuable context. For instance, the Patent Claims Research Dataset can offer data on claim-level statistics and document-level statistics, which can help in understanding trends and patterns in patent claims[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Analysis: The claims section is crucial for defining the legal scope of the invention.
  • Scope of the Invention: The description and drawings provide context to the claims.
  • Prior Art: Understanding prior art is essential for determining novelty and non-obviousness.
  • Patent Landscape: Analyzing related patents and applications helps in understanding the competitive environment.
  • Tools and Resources: Utilizing tools like the Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and PEDS can streamline the analysis process.

FAQs

Q: How do I search for a specific patent like 4,338,317? A: You can use the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool or visit the USPTO Public Search Facility to search for specific patents.

Q: What is the importance of the claims section in a patent? A: The claims section defines the legal scope of the invention and is crucial for determining infringement and validity.

Q: How can I analyze the patent landscape for a specific invention? A: Use tools like Global Dossier and PEDS to identify related patents and applications, and review office actions and citations.

Q: What role does prior art play in patent analysis? A: Prior art helps determine the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention, which are key criteria for patentability.

Q: Where can I find statistical data on patent claims? A: The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from US patents and applications.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. USA.gov - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: https://www.usa.gov/agencies/u-s-patent-and-trademark-office
  3. USPTO - Patent Claims Research Dataset: https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  4. Canadian Patents Database - Patent 1237723 Summary: https://brevets-patents.ic.gc.ca/opic-cipo/cpd/eng/patent/1237723/summary.html
  5. PubChem - Analogous Process for Preparing Therapeutically Usable Substituted Imidazolylalkylpiperazine and Diazepine Derivatives: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/FI-93104-C

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,338,317

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.