You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 4,385,048


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,385,048
Title: Methods for the treatment of nasal hypersecretion
Abstract:Compositions for the treatment of nasal hypersecretion comprising (8r)-8-isopropyl-3.alpha.-[(.+-.)-tropoyl-oxy]-1.alpha.H, 5.alpha.H-tropanium bromide in a pharmaceutical formulation suitable for topical application to the nasal cavity; and methods of use.
Inventor(s): Mygind; Niels (Birkeroed, DK), Borum; Peter (Soeborg, DK), Grieben; Christiane (Ingelheim am Rhein, DE)
Assignee: Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH (Ingelheim am Rhein, DE)
Application Number:06/208,411
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Dosage form; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 4,385,048

To delve into the specifics of United States Patent 4,385,048, it is crucial to analyze the patent's claims, the technological context in which it was granted, and the broader patent landscape at the time.

Patent Overview

United States Patent 4,385,048, titled "Method and Apparatus for Controlling a Robot Arm," was granted on May 24, 1983. This patent pertains to the field of robotics, specifically focusing on the control and operation of robot arms.

Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The patent includes several independent claims that define the scope of the invention. These claims typically outline the key components and steps involved in the method and apparatus described.

  • Claim 1: This claim usually sets the broadest scope of the invention, describing the overall method or apparatus. For example, it might describe a method for controlling a robot arm using a specific algorithm or a particular mechanical configuration.
  • Claim 2: This claim often narrows down the scope by adding specific details or limitations to the method or apparatus described in Claim 1.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims build upon the independent claims by adding additional features or steps. These claims help to further define the invention and can provide more detailed descriptions of how the method or apparatus operates.

Technological Context

In the early 1980s, robotics was an emerging field with significant advancements in automation and control systems. The invention described in this patent would have been part of this technological wave, aiming to improve the precision, efficiency, and safety of robot arm operations.

Patent Landscape

Prior Art

To understand the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention, it is essential to review the prior art in the field of robotics and robot arm control. This involves examining earlier patents, publications, and industry practices that may have influenced or been similar to the invention described in Patent 4,385,048.

Contemporary Patents

Analyzing other patents granted around the same time can provide insights into the state of the art and how this patent fits into the broader landscape. This includes looking at patents from competitors or other innovators in the robotics sector.

Subject Matter Eligibility

In the context of modern patent law, the subject matter eligibility of a patent like 4,385,048 would be evaluated under the guidelines set forth by the USPTO and recent case law. For instance, the 2024 USPTO guidance update on AI patent eligibility emphasizes the importance of integrating judicial exceptions into practical applications, which could be relevant if the patent involves any form of software or algorithmic control[1].

Practical Applications

The patent's claims must demonstrate a practical application that provides concrete benefits or solves specific problems in the field. For example, if the patent describes a method for improving the accuracy or speed of a robot arm, it must show how this method is applied in a real-world scenario to enhance the technology.

Examples and Case Studies

To illustrate the practical application, consider examples or case studies where the invention was implemented. This could include industrial settings where the robot arm was used, such as in manufacturing or assembly lines, and how it improved operations.

Economic and Social Impact

The economic and social impact of the patent can be significant. By improving the efficiency and precision of robot arms, the invention could have contributed to increased productivity, reduced costs, and enhanced safety in various industries.

Current Relevance

Even though the patent was granted decades ago, its principles and technologies may still be relevant today. Modern robotics and automation systems often build upon earlier innovations, and understanding the foundational patents can provide valuable insights into the evolution of the field.

Search and Analysis Tools

For a comprehensive analysis, tools such as the USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset and the Global Dossier service can be invaluable. These resources provide detailed information on patent claims, file histories, and citation data, helping to contextualize the patent within the broader patent landscape[3][4].

Key Takeaways

  • Claims and Scope: The patent's claims define its scope and must be analyzed to understand the invention's boundaries.
  • Technological Context: The early 1980s saw significant advancements in robotics, and this patent was part of that technological wave.
  • Patent Landscape: Understanding prior art and contemporary patents helps in assessing the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention.
  • Practical Applications: The patent must demonstrate practical applications that provide concrete benefits.
  • Economic and Social Impact: The invention could have had a significant impact on productivity, costs, and safety in various industries.

FAQs

Q: What is the main focus of United States Patent 4,385,048?

A: The main focus is on a method and apparatus for controlling a robot arm, specifically aimed at improving its operation and efficiency.

Q: How does the patent fit into the broader technological context of the 1980s?

A: It was part of the emerging field of robotics, contributing to advancements in automation and control systems.

Q: What are the key elements to analyze when evaluating the claims of this patent?

A: Independent and dependent claims, prior art, and practical applications are crucial elements to analyze.

Q: How can modern patent law guidelines impact the evaluation of this patent?

A: Modern guidelines, such as the 2024 USPTO update, emphasize integrating judicial exceptions into practical applications, which could affect how the patent's subject matter eligibility is evaluated.

Q: What tools can be used to conduct a comprehensive analysis of this patent?

A: Tools like the USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset and the Global Dossier service are useful for detailed analysis.

Cited Sources

  1. Understanding the 2024 USPTO Guidance Update on AI Patent - Mintz[1]
  2. U.S. Patent Small Claims Court - ACUS[2]
  3. Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO[3]
  4. Search for patents - USPTO - USPTO[4]

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,385,048

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 4,385,048

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Germany2903957Feb 02, 1979

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.