You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 4,911,920


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 4,911,920
Title: Sustained release, comfort formulation for glaucoma therapy
Abstract:Disclosed are nonstinging, sustained release ophthalmic formulations to control intraocular pressure in antiglaucoma therapy comprising a basic active, a cation exchange resin, and, inter alia, an acidic, mucomimetic polymer. Also disclosed are methods of treatment comprising administering such formulations topically to the eye when indicated for control and lowering of intraocular pressure.
Inventor(s): Jani; Rajni (Fort Worth, TX), Harris; Robert G. (Fort Worth, TX)
Assignee: Alcon Laboratories, Inc. (Fort Worth, TX)
Application Number:07/154,514
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 4,911,920: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, understanding its scope and claims is crucial for determining its validity, enforceability, and potential impact on the market. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 4,911,920, exploring its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the legal definitions of what the inventor considers to be their invention. They define the scope of protection granted by the patent and are a critical component of the patent document[3].

Patent 4,911,920: Overview

To analyze the scope and claims of United States Patent 4,911,920, one must first identify the patent's title, inventor, assignee, and the field of invention.

Title and Inventor

The title of the patent provides a brief description of the invention. For example, if the patent is related to a specific technological innovation, the title will reflect this. The inventor's name and background can also offer insights into the expertise and context behind the invention.

Assignee

The assignee is the entity to which the patent rights have been assigned. This could be a company, university, or other organization. Understanding the assignee can help in identifying potential stakeholders and the commercial implications of the patent.

Field of Invention

The field of invention indicates the broader category under which the patent falls. This could be anything from pharmaceuticals to software.

Claims Analysis

Independent and Dependent Claims

Patent claims are typically divided into independent and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. Dependent claims, on the other hand, refer back to and further limit the independent claims[3].

  • Independent Claims: These claims are the broadest and most important. They define the core of the invention and are often the most contentious during litigation.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims narrow down the invention by adding additional features or limitations. They are often used to provide a fallback position if the broader independent claims are found invalid.

Claim Language and Scope

The language used in the claims is critical. It must be precise and clear to avoid ambiguity. The scope of the claims determines what is protected by the patent and what is not. Broader claims may cover more variations of the invention but are also more likely to be challenged for being overly broad[3].

Patent Scope Metrics

To measure the scope of a patent, metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count can be used. These metrics can provide insights into the breadth and complexity of the patent claims.

  • Independent Claim Length: Longer independent claims often indicate more complex inventions or attempts to cover a broader range of variations.
  • Independent Claim Count: A higher number of independent claims can suggest a more comprehensive protection strategy but may also increase the risk of invalidation due to overbreadth[3].

Patent Landscape

Prior Art and Citations

Understanding the prior art cited in the patent is essential for assessing its novelty and non-obviousness. The Common Citation Document (CCD) tool can be useful here, as it consolidates citation data from multiple patent offices[1].

Related Patents and Patent Families

Identifying related patents and patent families can help in understanding the broader technological landscape. Tools like the Global Dossier and Patent Public Search can provide access to related applications and citations across different IP offices[1].

International Patent Offices

Searching international patent databases, such as those provided by the European Patent Office (EPO), Japan Patent Office (JPO), and World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), can reveal whether similar inventions have been patented abroad[1].

Search Resources

USPTO Public Search Facility

The USPTO Public Search Facility and Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs) offer valuable resources for conducting thorough patent searches. Trained staff can assist in navigating these resources[1].

Online Databases

Online databases such as PATENTSCOPE by WIPO and esp@cenet by the EPO provide comprehensive access to international patent collections. These databases often include machine translations, which can be particularly useful for non-English patents[1].

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

Patent Validity and Enforcement

The validity of a patent can be challenged through various legal mechanisms. Understanding the legal framework, including case law and regulatory guidelines, is crucial for enforcing or challenging a patent.

Litigation and Licensing

Patent litigation often revolves around the interpretation of claims and the scope of protection. Licensing agreements also depend on the clarity and breadth of the patent claims.

Case Studies and Industry Insights

Industry experts often highlight the importance of clear and well-defined patent claims. For instance, narrower claims at publication are associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Clear Claims: Clear and precise claim language is essential for avoiding ambiguity and ensuring enforceability.
  • Scope Metrics: Metrics like independent claim length and count can help in assessing the breadth and complexity of patent claims.
  • Prior Art: Understanding prior art and citations is crucial for assessing novelty and non-obviousness.
  • International Search: Searching international patent databases is necessary to ensure global uniqueness of the invention.
  • Legal Considerations: Understanding legal frameworks and regulatory guidelines is vital for patent enforcement and licensing.

FAQs

  1. What are the key components of a patent claim?

    • The key components include independent claims, which define the core of the invention, and dependent claims, which further limit the independent claims.
  2. How do you measure the scope of a patent?

    • Metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count can be used to measure the scope of a patent.
  3. What is the importance of prior art in patent analysis?

    • Prior art is essential for assessing the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention.
  4. Where can you find related patents and patent families?

    • Tools like the Global Dossier and Patent Public Search can provide access to related applications and citations across different IP offices.
  5. Why is it important to search international patent databases?

    • Searching international databases ensures that the invention is unique globally and helps in avoiding potential infringement issues.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents
  2. Casetext - Ex Parte Palko
  3. SSRN - Patent Claims and Patent Scope
  4. Google APIs - United States Patent (19)
  5. Law Resource - 431 F.2d 1074

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 4,911,920

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.