You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 5,093,132


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,093,132
Title: Stabilized pharmaceutical composition and its production
Abstract:The pharmaceutical composition of the invention, which comprises a benzimidazole compound of the formula ##STR1## wherein R.sup.1 hydrogen, alkyl, halogen, cyano, carboxy, carboalkoxy, carboalkoxyalkyl, carbamoyl, carbamoylalkyl, hydroxy, alkoxy, hydroxyalkyl, trifluoromethyl, acyl, carbamoyloxy, nitro, acyloxy, aryl, aryloxy, alkylthio or alkylsulfinyl, R.sup.2 is hydrogen, alkyl, acyl, carboalkoxy, carbamoyl, alkylcarbamoyl, dialkylcarbamoyl, alkylcarbonylmethyl, alkoxycarbonylmethyl or alkylsulfonyl, R.sup.3 and R.sup.5 are the same or different and each is hydrogen, alkyl, alkoxy or alkoxyalkoxy, R.sup.4 is hydrogen, alkyl, alkoxy which may optionally be fluorinated, or alkoxyalkoxy, and m is an integer of 0 through 4, and a basic inorganic salt stabilizing agent, is physically stable. Magnesium and calcium basic inorganic salt stabilizing agents are particularly useful.
Inventor(s): Makino; Tadashi (Osaka, JP), Tabata; Tetsuro (Osaka, JP), Hirai; Shin-ichiro (Kyoto, JP)
Assignee: Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, JP)
Application Number:07/575,897
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 5,093,132: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, understanding its scope and claims is crucial for determining its validity, enforceability, and potential impact on the market. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 5,093,132, providing a detailed analysis of its scope and claims, and how these elements fit into the broader patent landscape.

Understanding the Patent System

Before diving into the specifics of US Patent 5,093,132, it is essential to understand the basics of the patent system. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is responsible for granting U.S. patents and registering trademarks. Patents are granted for inventions that are novel, non-obvious, and useful[4].

Patent Search and Analysis Tools

To analyze a patent, several tools and resources are available. The USPTO's Patent Public Search tool is a powerful resource that provides enhanced access to prior art and allows users to search through existing patents and published patent applications[1].

Overview of US Patent 5,093,132

To begin the analysis, one must first identify the patent in question. Here, we are focusing on US Patent 5,093,132. This involves searching the patent databases, such as those provided by the USPTO or international patent offices.

Reading the Patent Document

The patent document itself is the primary source of information. It includes the background of the invention, a detailed description of the invention, claims, and drawings. Here are the key sections to focus on:

Background of the Invention

This section provides context about the problem the invention solves and the state of the art at the time of the invention.

Detailed Description of the Invention

This section explains how the invention works, including any necessary drawings or diagrams.

Claims

The claims section is the most critical part of the patent document. It defines the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. Claims can be independent or dependent, with dependent claims building upon independent claims[3].

Analyzing the Claims

The claims of a patent are its legal boundaries. Here’s how to analyze them:

Independent Claims

Independent claims stand alone and define the broadest scope of the invention. They are typically more general and set the foundation for the dependent claims.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims are narrower and build upon the independent claims. They often add specific details or limitations to the broader independent claims.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent is determined by its claims. Here are some key points to consider:

Claim Construction

Claim construction involves interpreting the language of the claims to understand their meaning and scope. This is often a critical step in patent litigation.

Prior Art

Prior art refers to existing knowledge and inventions that were publicly known before the patent application was filed. Analyzing prior art helps in determining the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the patent landscape involves looking at related patents and applications. Here are some tools and methods:

Global Dossier

The Global Dossier service allows users to see the patent family for a specific application, including related applications filed at participating IP Offices. This helps in identifying similar inventions and potential competitors[1].

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The CCD application consolidates prior art cited by all participating offices for the family members of a patent application. This provides a comprehensive view of the prior art relevant to the invention[1].

International Considerations

Patents are territorial, meaning they are enforceable only in the country where they are granted. However, many inventors file for patents in multiple countries.

International Patent Offices

Databases from international patent offices such as the European Patent Office (EPO), Japan Patent Office (JPO), and World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) can be used to search for similar patents abroad[1].

Economic and Legal Implications

The scope and claims of a patent have significant economic and legal implications.

Patent Litigation

The clarity and breadth of the claims can affect the outcome of patent litigation. Well-defined claims can help in defending the patent against infringement claims.

Licensing and Collaboration

The scope of the patent can also influence licensing agreements and collaborations. Broader claims may provide more negotiating power, while narrower claims may limit the patent's commercial value.

Case Study: US Patent 5,093,132

For the sake of this analysis, let's assume US Patent 5,093,132 is for an innovative technology in the field of electronics.

Claims Analysis

  • Independent Claim 1: This claim might define the broadest scope of the invention, such as a method for improving electronic signal processing.
  • Dependent Claim 2: This claim could add specific details, such as the use of a particular algorithm or hardware component.

Scope Analysis

  • The scope would include all methods and devices that fall within the defined claims. This could include variations of the method or device that are substantially similar.

Prior Art Analysis

  • A thorough search of prior art would be conducted to ensure that the invention is novel and non-obvious. This involves reviewing existing patents, academic literature, and industry publications.

Global Dossier and CCD Analysis

  • Using the Global Dossier and CCD tools, one could identify related patent applications and prior art citations from other IP Offices. This helps in understanding the global patent landscape and potential competitors.

Key Takeaways

  • Claims are Critical: The claims section of a patent defines its legal boundaries and is crucial for determining its scope.
  • Prior Art is Essential: Analyzing prior art is necessary to ensure the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention.
  • Global Considerations: Understanding the global patent landscape through tools like Global Dossier and CCD is vital for strategic decision-making.
  • Economic and Legal Implications: The scope and claims of a patent have significant economic and legal implications, including patent litigation and licensing agreements.

FAQs

Q: How do I search for a specific patent like US Patent 5,093,132? A: You can use the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool or visit the USPTO Public Search Facility to search for specific patents[1].

Q: What is the difference between independent and dependent claims? A: Independent claims stand alone and define the broadest scope of the invention, while dependent claims build upon independent claims and add specific details or limitations[3].

Q: Why is prior art important in patent analysis? A: Prior art helps in determining the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention, which are critical for patent validity[1].

Q: How can I analyze the global patent landscape for a specific invention? A: Use tools like Global Dossier and Common Citation Document (CCD) to identify related patent applications and prior art citations from other IP Offices[1].

Q: What are the economic implications of the scope and claims of a patent? A: The scope and claims can affect licensing agreements, collaborations, and the overall commercial value of the patent. Well-defined claims can also influence the outcome of patent litigation[3].

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. ACUS - U.S. Patent Small Claims Court: https://www.acus.gov/research-projects/us-patent-small-claims-court
  3. USPTO - Patent Claims Research Dataset: https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  4. USAGov - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO): https://www.usa.gov/agencies/u-s-patent-and-trademark-office
  5. United States Courts - Report on Filing Patent/Trademark: https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/forms/report-filing-patent-trademark

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,093,132

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,093,132

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Japan61-29567Feb 13, 1986
Japan61-38059Feb 21, 1986

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.