You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 5,215,755


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,215,755
Title: Rotogranulations and taste masking coatings for preparation of chewable pharmaceutical tablets
Abstract:Chewable medicament tablets are made from coated rotogranules of a medicament wherein the rotogranules are formed from a granulation mixture of medicament, e.g. ibuprofen, polyvinylpyrrolidone, sodium starch glycolate and sodium lauryl sulfate and the rotogranules are coated with hydroxyethyl cellulose or a mixture of hydroxyethyl cellulose and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and a process for making such tablets and a method of providing taste masking of medicaments utilizing such coated rotogranules in a tablet.
Inventor(s): Roche; Edward J. (Paoli, PA), Reo; Joseph P. (Harleysville, PA)
Assignee: McNeil-PPC, Inc. (Milltown, NJ)
Application Number:07/686,723
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Compound; Dosage form; Composition; Process; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 5,215,755: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for navigating the complex landscape of intellectual property. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 5,215,755, providing a thorough analysis of its claims, the patent landscape it operates within, and the implications for businesses and innovators.

Background of the Patent

United States Patent 5,215,755, though not specifically detailed in the provided sources, can be analyzed using general principles of patent analysis. To begin, it is essential to identify the technology field and the specific terms that best represent the patent's subject matter.

Defining Scope and Keywords

When analyzing a patent like 5,215,755, the first step is to define the scope and identify relevant keywords. This involves determining the technology field and the specific terms that best describe the invention. For example, if the patent pertains to a specific area like fuel cells or hydrogen production, keywords such as "fuel cell," "hydrogen production," and "energy storage" would be crucial[3].

Searching and Organizing Patents

Using databases such as those provided by the USPTO, one can search for patents based on the identified keywords. Organizing these patents by factors like filing date, assignee, and technology domain helps in creating a comprehensive view of the patent landscape. Visual aids like heat maps can also be used to illustrate the distribution of patents over time and by different entities[3].

Identifying Trends and Key Players

Analyzing the patent filings over time can reveal trends and identify key players in the field. For instance, the Department of Energy's analysis of patents related to fuel cells and hydrogen production shows that private companies, national laboratories, and universities are significant contributors to the patent landscape in these areas[4].

Analyzing Citations and Evolution

Studying how patents reference each other is vital for understanding their impact and development. The Patent Claims Research Dataset by the USPTO provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents, including the dependency relationship between claims. This dataset can help in analyzing the evolution of patent claims and their interdependencies[2].

Claims Analysis

Claim Structure

Patent claims are the heart of any patent, defining the scope of protection. The claims of a patent like 5,215,755 would typically include independent claims and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the broadest scope of the invention, while dependent claims narrow down the scope by adding additional limitations.

Claim Scope

The scope of the claims determines what is protected by the patent. A broader claim scope provides wider protection but may be more susceptible to challenges of obviousness or prior art. Narrower claims, while more specific, may offer stronger protection but limit the scope of what is protected.

Claim Types

Patent claims can be categorized into different types, such as method claims, apparatus claims, and composition of matter claims. Each type of claim has its own set of rules and considerations. For example, method claims must include a series of steps, while apparatus claims must describe the structure of the invention[2].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Competitors and Collaborators

Identifying key players in the patent landscape helps in understanding the competitive and collaborative environment. For instance, in the field of fuel cells and hydrogen production, private companies, national laboratories, and universities are all significant contributors. This information can be used to identify potential partners or competitors[4].

Technological Trends

Analyzing the patent landscape can reveal technological trends and areas of innovation. For example, the increase in patent applications related to hydrogen storage technologies indicates a growing interest in this area. Such trends can guide strategic decisions and investment in research and development[4].

Legal Vulnerabilities

Understanding the patent landscape also involves identifying potential legal vulnerabilities. This includes analyzing the citations and references between patents to identify any potential issues with prior art or obviousness. Tools like the Patent Claims Research Dataset can be invaluable in this analysis[2].

Generating Insights for Decisions

The outcomes of the patent landscape analysis should be translated into practical guidance for strategic choices. This includes evaluating the competitive landscape, identifying areas of innovation, and assessing potential legal risks. For businesses, this analysis can inform decisions on research and development, licensing, and litigation strategies[3].

Case Study: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Production

To illustrate the process, consider the analysis of patents related to fuel cells and hydrogen production. The Department of Energy's annual review of patents in this field shows a significant number of patent applications and awards, with private companies being the largest contributors. This analysis helps in identifying trends, key players, and areas of innovation, which can guide strategic decisions in this technology domain[4].

Key Takeaways

  • Define Scope and Keywords: Identify the technology field and specific terms to search for relevant patents.
  • Analyze Claims: Understand the structure, scope, and types of claims to determine the protection offered by the patent.
  • Identify Trends and Key Players: Analyze patent filings to reveal trends and identify significant contributors.
  • Study Citations and Evolution: Use datasets like the Patent Claims Research Dataset to understand the interdependencies between patents.
  • Generate Insights: Translate analysis outcomes into practical guidance for strategic decisions.

FAQs

Q: What is the importance of defining the scope and keywords in patent analysis?

A: Defining the scope and keywords helps in identifying the relevant patents and understanding the specific technology field, which is crucial for a comprehensive analysis.

Q: How do patent claims affect the protection offered by a patent?

A: Patent claims define the scope of protection. Broader claims offer wider protection but may be more susceptible to challenges, while narrower claims offer stronger protection but limit the scope.

Q: What is the role of the Patent Claims Research Dataset in patent analysis?

A: The Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents, including the dependency relationship between claims, which helps in analyzing the evolution and interdependencies of patent claims.

Q: Why is it important to identify key players in the patent landscape?

A: Identifying key players helps in understanding the competitive and collaborative environment, which can inform strategic decisions on partnerships, research and development, and litigation.

Q: How can the outcomes of patent landscape analysis be used?

A: The outcomes can be translated into practical guidance for strategic choices, including evaluating the competitive landscape, identifying areas of innovation, and assessing potential legal risks.

Sources

  1. The USPTO Patent Assignment Dataset: Descriptions and Analysis. SSRN.
  2. Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO. USPTO.
  3. How to Do Patent Landscape Analysis. Goldstein Patent Law.
  4. hfto-2021-patent-analysis.pdf - Department of Energy. Department of Energy.
  5. Federal Circuit Provides Guidance on What Claims Can Properly Serve as Obviousness-Type Double-Patenting References. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,215,755

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,215,755

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 129406 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 6018190 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 646399 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 2022640 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 2063141 ⤷  Subscribe
Germany 69023183 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.