You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 5,545,628


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,545,628
Title: Pharmaceutical composition containing fenofibrate
Abstract:A pharmaceutical composition is provided for treating hyperlipidemia or hypercholesterolemia or both in a mammal, which contains an effective amount of each of fenofibrate and an excipient containing one or more polyglycolyzed glycerides.
Inventor(s): Deboeck; Arthur (Carolina, PR), Maes; Paul (Carolina, PR), Baudier; Phillipe R. (Carolina, PR)
Assignee: Galephar P.R. Inc. (Carolina, PR)
Application Number:08/370,883
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Dosage form; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of a US Patent: A Detailed Analysis

Introduction to US Patents

When navigating the complex world of intellectual property, understanding the scope and claims of a US patent is crucial. This article will delve into the intricacies of patent claims, the tools and methods for conducting patent searches, and the importance of getting the claim scope right.

What are Patent Claims?

Patent claims define the scope of protection granted to an inventor for their invention. These claims are the heart of a patent application and must be carefully crafted to ensure they are valid and enforceable[3].

The Importance of Claim Scope

A common misconception among patent applicants is that broader claims are always better. However, this is not the case. While broader claims offer broader protection, they are also more difficult to get granted and easier to invalidate. The key is to find the right balance between breadth and specificity[3].

Balancing Breadth and Specificity

The claim scope must be anchored to the embodiments described in the specification. Overly broad claims can lead to invalidation due to the abstract idea exception or failure to meet the written description requirement. For example, the Federal Circuit court has ruled that claims directed to abstract ideas without specific means or methods are not patentable[3].

Factors Influencing Claim Scope

Several factors influence the determination of the right claim scope, including:

  • The Actual Invention: The claims must accurately reflect what the invention is.
  • Prior Art: The level of prior art in the technical field can affect the validity of broader claims.
  • Client’s Budget: The cost of getting a patent granted on broader claims can be higher.
  • Technical Field: Different fields have different standards for claim scope[3].

Conducting a Preliminary US Patent Search

Before drafting patent claims, it is essential to conduct a thorough patent search to identify prior art and ensure the novelty of the invention.

Tools for Patent Searching

The USPTO provides several tools for patent searching:

Patent Public Search

This is a web-based patent search application that replaced legacy tools like PubEast and PubWest. It offers enhanced access to prior art with two modern interfaces[1].

Global Dossier

This service allows users to access file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, including the IP5 Offices. It provides a comprehensive view of the patent family, classification, and citation data[1].

Public Search Facility

Located in Alexandria, VA, this facility offers access to patent and trademark information in various formats, including online, microfilm, and print. Trained staff are available to assist users[1].

Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs)

These centers provide local search resources and training in patent search techniques[1].

International Patent Searches

To ensure global novelty, it is crucial to search international patent databases:

  • European Patent Office (EPO): Provides access to Europe's patent databases through esp@cenet, including machine translations[1].
  • Japan Patent Office (JPO): Offers machine translations of Japanese patents[1].
  • World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): The PATENTSCOPE database allows full-text searching of international patent applications and provides machine translations for some documents[1][4].

Analyzing the Patent Landscape

Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)

The CPC database is a powerful tool for finding relevant classification schemes. It allows for precise searching across various patent offices worldwide[4].

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The CCD application consolidates citation data from participating IP Offices, enabling users to visualize search results for the same invention on a single page. This is particularly useful for identifying prior art cited by multiple offices[1].

Case Study: United States Patent 5,545,628

To illustrate the importance of claim scope and the patent landscape, let's consider a hypothetical analysis of United States Patent 5,545,628.

Claim Analysis

  • Claim Scope: The claims of this patent must be carefully examined to ensure they are not overly broad and are supported by the specification.
  • Prior Art: A thorough search using tools like the Patent Public Search and Global Dossier would help identify any prior art that could affect the validity of the claims.
  • International Considerations: Searching international databases such as those provided by the EPO, JPO, and WIPO would ensure the invention is novel globally.

Patent Landscape

  • Classification: Using the CPC database, one can classify the patent and identify similar patents in the same category.
  • Citation Data: The CCD application would provide a comprehensive view of citations from various IP Offices, helping to understand the patent's position within the broader patent landscape[1][4].

Key Considerations for Drafting Claims

Avoiding Overly Broad Claims

Drafters must avoid claims that are too broad, as they can be invalidated due to the abstract idea exception or failure to meet the written description requirement. For example, the Yu v. Apple Inc. case highlights the risks of overly broad claims being deemed abstract ideas[3].

Ensuring Specificity

Claims should be directed to specific means or methods that improve the relevant technology. This ensures that the claims are not only valid but also enforceable.

Keeping Up with Legal Trends

Patent drafters must stay updated with current court decisions and legislative changes. The legal framework around patentability is constantly evolving, and staying informed is crucial for drafting effective claims[3].

Conclusion

Understanding the scope and claims of a US patent is a complex but critical task. By using the right tools for patent searching, balancing breadth and specificity in claims, and staying informed about legal trends, inventors and patent drafters can ensure their patents are strong and enforceable.

Key Takeaways

  • Claim Scope: The right balance between breadth and specificity is crucial.
  • Patent Searching: Thorough searches using tools like Patent Public Search and Global Dossier are essential.
  • International Considerations: Searching international databases ensures global novelty.
  • Legal Trends: Staying updated with court decisions and legislative changes is vital.
  • Specificity: Claims should be directed to specific means or methods to avoid invalidation.

FAQs

What is the purpose of conducting a preliminary US patent search?

Conducting a preliminary US patent search helps identify prior art and ensures the novelty of the invention, which is essential for drafting valid and enforceable patent claims.

Why is it important to avoid overly broad claims?

Overly broad claims are more difficult to get granted and easier to invalidate due to the abstract idea exception or failure to meet the written description requirement.

What tools are available for international patent searches?

Tools like the European Patent Office's esp@cenet, the Japan Patent Office's database, and WIPO's PATENTSCOPE database provide access to international patent applications and machine translations.

How does the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) database help in patent searching?

The CPC database allows for precise searching across various patent offices worldwide by providing relevant classification schemes.

What is the Common Citation Document (CCD) application used for?

The CCD application consolidates citation data from participating IP Offices, enabling users to visualize search results for the same invention on a single page.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. Attn: Arthur M. Deboeck, Vice President: https://law.shu.edu/documents/hhs-lipofen-warning-letter.pdf
  3. The Importance of Getting the Claim Scope Right in a US Patent Application: https://www.rimonlaw.com/the-importance-of-getting-the-claim-scope-right-in-a-us-patent-application-i/
  4. Research and Course Guides: Patent Searching, Advanced: Overview: https://clemson.libguides.com/advanced_patent_searching

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,545,628

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 5,545,628

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 4380896 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 2210985 ⤷  Subscribe
Germany 69627817 ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0801562 ⤷  Subscribe
Spain 2200048 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.