You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 5,658,583


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,658,583
Title: Apparatus and methods for improved noninvasive dermal administration of pharmaceuticals
Abstract:An apparatus, product formulation, and method for improved dermal permeation of pharmaceuticals wherein the apparatus includes a thin drug formulation reservoir and a heat-generating chamber separated by a first non-permeable wall, wherein the reservoir and chamber are formed in or supported by a housing. The drug formulation reservoir houses or is capable of housing a predetermined amount of a formulation containing pharmaceutically-active agent(s). The heat-generating/temperature-regulating chamber includes a medium for generating controlled heat, preferably a chemical composition made of carbon, iron, water and/or salt which is activated upon contact with air (oxygen). The function of the heat-generating/temperature-regulating element is to heat the user's skin, rapidly bring the skin temperature to a desired and elevated narrow range and keep it in this range for sufficient time to obtain more rapid, enhanced and less variable dermal absorption of selected pharmaceutically-active agents and to obtain improved clinical effects. Structure for controlling the generation of heat is also disclosed. The apparatus may optionally include a spacing or standoff structure which spans the drug formulation reservoir between the non-permeable wall and the user's skin surface for maintaining a predetermined thickness of the drug formulation on the user's skin surface. Also, a novel product formulation which can be used with the apparatus which uses high percentage of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics to reduce the overall degradation rate of the local anesthetic compound(s) in formulations which are subject to hydrolysis.
Inventor(s): Zhang; Jie (Salt Lake City, UT), Zhang; Hao (Salt Lake City, UT)
Assignee:
Application Number:08/508,463
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Device; Formulation; Composition; Compound; Use; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 5,658,583

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, particularly one like United States Patent 5,658,583, it is crucial to delve into the specifics of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape. This analysis will help in understanding the patent's validity, its impact on the industry, and potential legal implications.

Patent Overview

United States Patent 5,658,583, though not specifically detailed in the provided sources, can be analyzed using general principles of patent law and search tools available through the USPTO.

Searching for the Patent

To begin, one would use the USPTO's search facilities, such as the Public Search Facility or online databases, to locate the patent. The USPTO's database allows users to search for existing patents, published patent applications, and other related documentation[1].

Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of any patent, defining the scope of the invention. For a patent like 5,658,583, the claims must "particularly point[] out and distinctly claim[] the subject matter" regarded as the invention, as mandated by 35 U.S.C. ยง 112[2].

Claim Structure

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. They are crucial in determining the patent's scope.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims, often adding specific details or variations.

Claim Validity

The validity of claims can be challenged on grounds of indefiniteness or lack of patent eligibility. For instance, the case of Berkheimer v. HP Inc. highlights how claims must inform those skilled in the art about the scope of the invention with reasonable certainty. If the claims lack clear boundaries or specific examples, they may be deemed invalid[2].

Patent Scope

The scope of a patent is a critical aspect that determines its breadth and impact. Two simple metrics often used to measure patent scope are independent claim length and independent claim count[3].

Metrics for Measuring Scope

  • Independent Claim Length: Longer claims often indicate a narrower scope as they include more specific details.
  • Independent Claim Count: A higher number of claims can suggest a broader scope, but this can also lead to increased complexity and potential for overlap with existing patents.

Patent Examination Process

The examination process plays a significant role in shaping the final scope of a patent. The Patent Examination Data System (PEDS) and other tools allow for the analysis of bibliographic data and the history of the patent application. This process often narrows the scope of patent claims, making them more specific and reducing the likelihood of broad, overly vague claims[1][3].

Historical Context and Prior Art

Understanding the historical context and prior art is essential in assessing the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention. Resources like the NYPL Libguides provide access to historical patents, allowing researchers to determine whether an idea has been previously patented[4].

Legal and Policy Considerations

The legal landscape surrounding patents is constantly evolving. For example, the discussion around a potential small claims patent court highlights the need for more accessible and efficient dispute resolution mechanisms for patent holders and challengers[5].

Impact on the Industry

The scope and claims of a patent like 5,658,583 can significantly impact the industry by setting boundaries for what is considered innovative and what is not. Overly broad claims can stifle innovation by creating barriers to entry, while well-defined claims can encourage further development by clearly delineating what is protected and what is not.

Key Takeaways

  • Clear Claims: Patent claims must be clear and distinct to avoid indefiniteness.
  • Scope Metrics: Independent claim length and count are useful metrics for measuring patent scope.
  • Examination Process: The patent examination process is crucial in refining the scope of patent claims.
  • Historical Context: Understanding prior art is essential for assessing the novelty of an invention.
  • Legal Landscape: The legal environment, including potential reforms like a small claims patent court, can affect how patents are enforced and challenged.

FAQs

Q: How can I search for a specific patent like 5,658,583? A: You can use the USPTO's online search facilities or visit the Public Search Facility in Alexandria, VA to search for existing patents and related documentation[1].

Q: What makes a patent claim valid? A: A patent claim must "particularly point[] out and distinctly claim[] the subject matter" regarded as the invention, and it must inform those skilled in the art about the scope of the invention with reasonable certainty[2].

Q: How is the scope of a patent measured? A: The scope of a patent can be measured using metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count[3].

Q: Why is the patent examination process important? A: The examination process narrows the scope of patent claims, making them more specific and reducing the likelihood of broad, overly vague claims[1][3].

Q: How does the historical context of patents affect current patents? A: Understanding prior art helps in assessing the novelty and non-obviousness of an invention, ensuring that new patents do not overlap with existing ones[4].

Sources

  1. USPTO Search for Patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. Berkheimer v. HP Inc.: http://cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/17-1437.Opinion.2-6-2018.1.PDF
  3. Patent Claims and Patent Scope: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2844964
  4. How to Search for an Historical U.S. Patent: https://libguides.nypl.org/patents/historical_patents
  5. U.S. Patent Small Claims Court: https://www.acus.gov/research-projects/us-patent-small-claims-court

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,658,583

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.