You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 6, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,174,442


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,174,442
Title: Adsorbent for phosphate from an aqueous medium, production and use of said adsorbent
Abstract:An adsorbent for phosphate from aqueous medium, particularly for inorganic phosphate or phosphate bound to foodstuffs from body fluids or foodstuffs, which contains beta-iron hydroxide stabilized by carbohydrates and/or by humic acid.
Inventor(s): Geisser; Peter (St. Gallen, CH), Philipp; Erik (St. Gallen, CH)
Assignee: Vifor (International) AG (St. Gallen, SE)
Application Number:09/077,944
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Process; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 6,174,442: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

The United States Patent 6,174,442, titled "Adsorbent for phosphate and process for the preparation thereof," is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in the realm of iron-based phosphate adsorbents. This patent, held by Vifor Fresenius, is crucial for understanding the development and protection of sucroferric oxyhydroxide, a key ingredient in drugs like Velphoro.

Background and Inventors

The patent was issued on January 9, 2001, and it describes an adsorbent for phosphate and the process for its preparation. The inventors of this patent are not specified in the provided sources, but it is associated with Vifor Fresenius, a company known for its innovative pharmaceutical products[4].

Claims and Scope

Independent Claims

The patent's scope is defined by its independent claims, which outline the core inventions protected by the patent. For the '442 patent, the independent claims focus on the composition and preparation of an adsorbent containing polynuclear β-iron hydroxide stabilized by carbohydrates and/or humic acid. These claims are broad enough to cover the essential aspects of the invention but narrow enough to be enforceable.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims in the patent serve as fallback positions, each narrower than the independent claims they depend on. These claims provide additional specificity and help in defending the patent against potential invalidation by ensuring that even if an independent claim is ruled invalid, the dependent claims can still stand.

Claim Construction

The claims of the '442 patent are limited to the beta form of sucroferric oxyhydroxide, which is a critical distinction. This specificity ensures that the patent protection is targeted and does not overly broaden the scope, making it easier to enforce and less susceptible to challenges based on obviousness or lack of enablement[2].

Patent Landscape

Related Patents

The '442 patent is part of a broader patent landscape that includes other patents related to iron-based phosphate adsorbents. For example, the United States Patent 9,561,251 ('251 patent) also deals with pharmaceutical compositions containing high loads of iron oxyhydroxide, but it focuses on different aspects and claims priority from earlier filings[2].

Expiration and Impact

The '442 patent expired on December 19, 2018. Despite its expiration, the patent remains significant for understanding the development of subsequent patents and the evolution of pharmaceutical compositions in this field. The expiration also opened the door for generic versions of drugs like Velphoro, which has led to legal battles over patent infringement and validity, as seen in the case between Vifor and Teva[2][4].

Technical Aspects

Stability and Preparation

The '442 patent addresses a critical issue in the development of iron-based phosphate adsorbents: stability. Iron oxide-hydroxide compounds are known to be unstable over time, undergoing crystallization and particle enlargement that can alter their phosphate binding properties. The patent describes a process for preparing a stable iron-containing phosphate adsorbent, which is scalable, robust, and consistently produces a pharmaceutical-grade product[4].

Pharmaceutical Applications

The adsorbent described in the patent is used in drugs like Velphoro, which is prescribed for controlling serum phosphorus levels in patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis. The stability and efficacy of the adsorbent are crucial for the drug's performance and patient safety.

Economic and Legal Implications

Market Impact

The expiration of the '442 patent has significant market implications. Generic manufacturers can now produce versions of Velphoro, potentially reducing costs for patients and increasing competition in the market. However, this also leads to legal disputes over patent infringement, as generic manufacturers must ensure their products do not infringe on still-valid patents, such as the '251 patent[2].

Legal Battles

The case between Vifor and Teva illustrates the legal complexities surrounding patent infringement and validity. Teva's attempt to market a generic version of Velphoro led to a Hatch-Waxman action, where Vifor alleged infringement of the '251 patent. The court's findings highlighted the importance of claim construction and the validity of the asserted claims[2].

Expert Insights

Patent Scope and Breadth

Patent attorneys and experts emphasize that the breadth of a patent's scope is critical. A broader patent offers more protection against infringers but is harder to obtain and maintain. The '442 patent's focus on the beta form of sucroferric oxyhydroxide is an example of how specificity can strengthen a patent's enforceability.

"Broad patents typically offer more protection against infringers than a narrow patent because they are oftentimes very hard to design around"[3].

Conclusion

The United States Patent 6,174,442 is a pivotal patent in the field of iron-based phosphate adsorbents, particularly for the development of drugs like Velphoro. Its claims and scope are carefully constructed to ensure enforceability and protect the invention from infringement. The patent's expiration has opened the market to generic competition, but ongoing legal battles highlight the complexities of patent law and the importance of precise claim construction.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope and Claims: The '442 patent's claims are specific to the beta form of sucroferric oxyhydroxide, ensuring targeted protection.
  • Technical Significance: The patent addresses the stability issue of iron oxide-hydroxide compounds, providing a scalable and robust preparation process.
  • Market Impact: The patent's expiration has led to generic competition, reducing costs for patients but also sparking legal disputes.
  • Legal Implications: The case between Vifor and Teva underscores the importance of claim construction and patent validity in Hatch-Waxman actions.
  • Expert Insights: Broad patents offer more protection but are harder to obtain and maintain, emphasizing the need for careful claim drafting.

FAQs

What is the main subject of the United States Patent 6,174,442?

The main subject of the patent is an adsorbent for phosphate and the process for its preparation, specifically focusing on polynuclear β-iron hydroxide stabilized by carbohydrates and/or humic acid.

Who is the current owner of the '442 patent?

The '442 patent is associated with Vifor Fresenius.

What is the significance of the patent's expiration?

The expiration of the '442 patent on December 19, 2018, allowed generic manufacturers to produce versions of Velphoro, increasing market competition and reducing costs for patients.

How does the '442 patent relate to other patents in the field?

The '442 patent is part of a broader patent landscape that includes other patents like the '251 patent, which deals with different aspects of iron-based phosphate adsorbents.

What are the key technical challenges addressed by the '442 patent?

The patent addresses the stability issue of iron oxide-hydroxide compounds, providing a scalable and robust process for preparing a pharmaceutical-grade adsorbent.

Sources

  1. United States District Court for the District of Delaware. In the United States District Court [PDF].
  2. United States District Court for the District of Delaware. In the United States District Court [PDF].
  3. Boston University Law Review. The Ways We've been Measuring Patent Scope are Wrong: How to Measure and Draw Causal Inferences with Patent Scope [PDF].
  4. New Drug Approvals. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide, 含糖酸化鉄, スクロオキシ水酸化鉄.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,174,442

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,174,442

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Germany195 47 356Dec 19, 1995
PCT Information
PCT FiledDecember 19, 1996PCT Application Number:PCT/EP96/05695
PCT Publication Date:June 26, 1997PCT Publication Number: WO97/22266

International Family Members for US Patent 6,174,442

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0868125 ⤷  Subscribe C300710 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0868125 ⤷  Subscribe PA2015003 Lithuania ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0868125 ⤷  Subscribe CA 2015 00007 Denmark ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0868125 ⤷  Subscribe 15C0018 France ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0868125 ⤷  Subscribe C00868125/01 Switzerland ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0868125 ⤷  Subscribe 425 Finland ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.