You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 6,221,392


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,221,392
Title: Rapidly dissolving robust dosage form
Abstract:The invention is directed to a hard tablet that can be stored, packaged and processed in bulk. Yet the tablet dissolves rapidly in the mouth of the patient with a minimum of grit. The tablet is created from an active ingredient mixed into a matrix of a nondirect compression filler and a relatively high lubricant content.
Inventor(s): Khankari; Rajendra K. (Maple Grove, MN), Hontz; John (Plymouth, MN), Chastain; Sara J. (Maple Grove, MN), Katzner; Leo (Eden Prairie, MN)
Assignee: Cima Labs Inc. (Eden Prairie, MN)
Application Number:09/464,882
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 6,221,392

Introduction

United States Patent 6,221,392, titled "Rapidly Dissolving Robust Dosage Form," is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in the development of oral dosage forms. This patent, owned by Cima Labs, Inc., has been central in several legal and technological discussions. Here’s a detailed analysis of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape.

Patent Overview

The patent, issued on April 24, 2001, describes a hard tablet that can be stored, packaged, and processed in bulk but dissolves rapidly in the mouth of the patient. This innovation addresses the need for robust yet quickly dissolving oral dosage forms, which is crucial for patient compliance and efficacy[4].

Claims of the Patent

The '392 patent includes multiple claims that define the scope of the invention. Here are some key aspects:

  • Claim Structure: The patent contains several claims that outline the composition, structure, and functionality of the rapidly dissolving dosage form. These claims are critical in defining what constitutes infringement and what is protected under the patent[4].

  • Key Claim Elements: The claims typically include specifications about the tablet's composition, such as the presence of certain excipients, the tablet's hardness, and its dissolution characteristics. For example, the claims might specify that the tablet must dissolve within a certain time frame when exposed to saliva[4].

Scope of Protection

The scope of protection for the '392 patent is defined by its claims and the specifications provided in the patent document.

  • Dosage Form Characteristics: The patent protects tablets that are robust enough for bulk handling but dissolve rapidly in the mouth. This dual functionality is a key aspect of the invention[4].

  • Exclusivity: Cima Labs, Inc., and its exclusive licensee, Schwarz Pharma, have the rights to manufacture, use, and sell alprazolam orally disintegrating tablets in the United States under this patent. This exclusivity is a significant factor in the patent's value and the legal battles surrounding it[1].

Patent Landscape

Understanding the patent landscape is crucial for navigating the intellectual property rights associated with the '392 patent.

  • Related Patents: The '392 patent is part of a broader portfolio that includes other related patents, such as the '981 patent. These patents collectively protect various aspects of orally disintegrating dosage forms[1].

  • Competitor Activity: The submission of Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) by generic manufacturers, such as Actavis, has led to legal disputes over the validity and infringement of the '392 patent. These disputes highlight the competitive nature of the pharmaceutical industry and the importance of patent protection[1].

Legal Challenges and Reexaminations

The '392 patent has faced several legal challenges and reexaminations.

  • Inter Partes Reexamination: An inter partes reexamination was initiated on July 28, 2006, and ordered on September 13, 2006. This process allows for the reevaluation of the patent's validity based on prior art and other evidence[1].

  • Court Cases: The patent has been at the center of several court cases, including those against Actavis and Par/Kali Defendants, alleging infringement and seeking to enforce the patent's exclusivity[1].

Patent Analytics and Claim Coverage

To fully understand the '392 patent's impact and coverage, patent analytics tools are essential.

  • Claim Coverage Matrix: This tool helps in categorizing patents by claims and scope concepts, making it easier to identify which patents and claims are actively protecting the intellectual property. For the '392 patent, this would involve analyzing the claims in relation to the broader scope of orally disintegrating dosage forms[3].

  • Claim Charts: Interactive claim charts generated by tools like ClaimScape® can help technical experts and management review the patent coverage. These charts are useful for identifying gaps in current coverage and highlighting future design opportunities[3].

Value Assessment

The value of the '392 patent can be assessed based on its current and potential future impact.

  • High-Value Claims: Claims that are directly relevant to current products and technologies are considered high-value. For the '392 patent, these would include claims related to the robust yet rapidly dissolving characteristics of the tablets[3].

  • Future Directions: Medium-value claims indicate potential future directions. These might include variations of the dosage form or new applications of the technology. Low-value claims may not be worth maintaining if they do not contribute significantly to the patent's overall value[3].

Impact on the Pharmaceutical Industry

The '392 patent has significant implications for the pharmaceutical industry.

  • Patient Compliance: The invention of rapidly dissolving tablets improves patient compliance, especially for patients who have difficulty swallowing traditional tablets[4].

  • Competitive Advantage: The exclusivity provided by the patent gives the patent holder a competitive advantage in the market, allowing them to maintain market share and protect their investment in research and development[1].

Expert Insights

Industry experts emphasize the importance of robust patent protection in the pharmaceutical sector.

"Patent protection is crucial for pharmaceutical companies to recoup their investment in research and development. Patents like the '392 patent ensure that innovators can protect their inventions and maintain a competitive edge in the market."[3]

Statistics and Trends

The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive, with significant investments in research and development.

  • R&D Investments: Pharmaceutical companies invest billions of dollars annually in R&D. Patents like the '392 patent are essential for protecting these investments and ensuring a return on investment[3].

  • Generic Competition: The submission of ANDAs by generic manufacturers is a common trend. Patents must be robust enough to withstand these challenges to maintain exclusivity[1].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope and Claims: The '392 patent protects a rapidly dissolving robust dosage form, with claims defining its composition, structure, and functionality.
  • Legal Challenges: The patent has faced inter partes reexaminations and court cases over infringement and validity.
  • Patent Analytics: Tools like Claim Coverage Matrix and Claim Charts are essential for understanding the patent's coverage and value.
  • Industry Impact: The patent improves patient compliance and provides a competitive advantage in the pharmaceutical market.
  • Value Assessment: The patent's value is assessed based on its current and potential future impact.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the main invention protected by the '392 patent? A: The '392 patent protects a hard tablet that can be stored, packaged, and processed in bulk but dissolves rapidly in the mouth of the patient.

Q: Who owns the rights to the '392 patent? A: Cima Labs, Inc. owns the rights to the '392 patent, with Schwarz Pharma holding an exclusive license for alprazolam orally disintegrating tablets in the United States.

Q: What legal challenges has the '392 patent faced? A: The patent has faced inter partes reexaminations and court cases, including disputes with Actavis and Par/Kali Defendants over infringement and validity.

Q: How does patent analytics help in understanding the '392 patent? A: Patent analytics tools like Claim Coverage Matrix and Claim Charts help in categorizing and analyzing the patent's claims, identifying gaps in coverage, and highlighting future design opportunities.

Q: What is the impact of the '392 patent on the pharmaceutical industry? A: The patent improves patient compliance and provides a competitive advantage to the patent holder in the market, protecting their investment in research and development.

Cited Sources

  1. United States District Court Document: Case 2:06-cv-01970-CCC-MF Document 40 Filed 06/07/07.
  2. Casetext: Ex Parte 6221392 et al, 95000160.
  3. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.: Patent Analytics.
  4. Google Patents: US6221392B1 - Rapidly dissolving robust dosage form.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,221,392

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Patented / Exclusive UseSubmissiondate
No data available in table
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Patented / Exclusive Use>Submissiondate
Showing 0 to 0 of 0 entries

International Family Members for US Patent 6,221,392

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Australia 6896998 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 726336 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2284663 ⤷  Try for Free
Denmark 2147669 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.