You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,369,085


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,369,085
Title: Form of S-omeprazole
Abstract:The present invention relates to a novel form of the (-)-enantiomer of 5-methoxy-2-[[(4-methoxy-3,5-dimethyl-2-pyridinyl)-methyl]sulfinyl]-1H-ben zimidazole, i.e. S-omeprazole. More specifically, it relates to a novel form of the magnesium salt of the S-enantiomer of omeprazole trihydrate. The present invention also relates to processes for preparing such a form of the magnesium salt of S-omeprazole and pharmaceutical compositions containing it. Furthermore, the present invention also relates to new intermediates used in the process.
Inventor(s): Cotton; Hanna (Sodertalje, SE), Kronstrom; Anders (Sodertalje, SE), Mattson; Anders (Sodertalje, SE), Moller; Eva (Sodertalje, SE)
Assignee: AstraZeneca AB (Sodertalje, SE)
Application Number:09/077,719
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 6,369,085
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Use; Process; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 6,369,085: A Detailed Analysis of Scope and Claims

Introduction

The United States Patent 6,369,085, hereafter referred to as the '085 patent, is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly related to the drug esomeprazole magnesium trihydrate. This patent is part of a broader patent landscape that has been the subject of numerous legal battles and strategic maneuvers. Here, we will delve into the scope, claims, and the patent landscape surrounding this patent.

Background of the Patent

The '085 patent, titled "Magnesium Salt of S-omeprazole," was granted to AstraZeneca AB and is listed in the FDA's Orange Book, which catalogs patents associated with approved drug products. This patent is crucial for the protection of AstraZeneca's brand drug Nexium, which is used to treat conditions like gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)[2][5].

Scope of the Patent

The '085 patent is narrowly focused on a specific form of the magnesium salt of S-omeprazole trihydrate. Here are the key aspects of its scope:

Claim Construction

The patent claims are centered around the characterization of the magnesium salt of S-omeprazole trihydrate based on its X-ray diffraction pattern. Specifically, Claim 1 of the '085 patent describes the compound as being "characterized by the following major peaks in its X-ray diffractogram"[4].

X-Ray Diffraction Peaks

The claim requires that the compound have specific major peaks in its X-ray diffractogram, but it does not demand an exact match. The court has interpreted this to mean that the compound must be "identifiable by reference to an X-ray diffractogram that includes the major peaks below," allowing for slight experimental variations[4].

Specification and Prosecution History

The specification of the patent provides detailed descriptions and examples of the invention, which are crucial for understanding the claim language. The prosecution history, including any amendments or arguments made during the patent application process, also plays a significant role in interpreting the claims[4].

Claims of the Patent

The '085 patent includes multiple claims, but they are all variations of the central theme related to the magnesium salt of S-omeprazole trihydrate.

Independent Claims

The independent claims, such as Claim 1, define the invention broadly, while dependent claims narrow down the scope by adding additional limitations. For example, claims 1-5, 7-14, and 16 of the '085 patent all relate to the magnesium salt of S-omeprazole trihydrate characterized by specific X-ray diffraction peaks[4].

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims build upon the independent claims by adding further specifications. These claims help to ensure that the patent covers various aspects of the invention without overly broadening its scope[4].

Patent Landscape and Litigation

The '085 patent is part of a complex patent landscape involving multiple patents related to esomeprazole magnesium trihydrate.

Orange Book Listings

The '085 patent is listed in the FDA's Orange Book, which is a critical factor for generic drug manufacturers seeking to market their versions of the drug. Generic manufacturers must certify whether their product infringes any listed patents or if those patents are invalid[1][2].

Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs)

Generic drug manufacturers, such as Dr. Reddy's Laboratories and Teva Pharmaceuticals, have filed ANDAs with Paragraph IV certifications, challenging the validity or non-infringement of the '085 patent among others. These certifications trigger patent infringement lawsuits by the brand drug manufacturer, AstraZeneca[1][2].

Legal Battles

AstraZeneca has been involved in several legal battles to protect its patents, including the '085 patent. For instance, AstraZeneca v. Teva and AstraZeneca v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories are notable cases where the validity and infringement of the '085 patent were contested[1][2].

Impact on Generic Drug Market

The '085 patent significantly impacts the generic drug market for esomeprazole magnesium trihydrate.

Delayed Market Entry

The presence of the '085 patent and other related patents can delay the market entry of generic versions of Nexium. Generic manufacturers must either wait for the patents to expire or successfully challenge them in court[1][2].

Litigation Costs

The litigation costs associated with challenging these patents can be substantial, affecting the financial viability of generic drug manufacturers. This can lead to higher prices for consumers as fewer generic options are available[3].

Patent Quality and Scope Metrics

The '085 patent's scope and quality can be evaluated using metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count.

Independent Claim Length

Research suggests that narrower claims, as measured by independent claim length, are associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process. The '085 patent's claims are relatively specific, focusing on the X-ray diffraction characteristics of the compound[3].

Independent Claim Count

The total number of independent claims in the '085 patent is moderate, indicating a balanced approach to defining the invention without overly broadening its scope. This balance is crucial for maintaining patent quality and avoiding unnecessary litigation[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Specific Claim Language: The '085 patent's claims are narrowly focused on the X-ray diffraction characteristics of the magnesium salt of S-omeprazole trihydrate.
  • Litigation and Market Impact: The patent has been central to several legal battles, affecting the market entry of generic versions of Nexium.
  • Patent Quality Metrics: The patent's scope is evaluated using metrics like independent claim length and count, indicating a balanced approach to defining the invention.
  • Orange Book Listings: The patent's listing in the FDA's Orange Book is critical for generic drug manufacturers seeking to market their versions of the drug.

FAQs

What is the main subject of the '085 patent?

The '085 patent is focused on the magnesium salt of S-omeprazole trihydrate, specifically its characterization by X-ray diffraction peaks.

How does the '085 patent affect generic drug manufacturers?

The '085 patent can delay the market entry of generic versions of Nexium by requiring generic manufacturers to either wait for the patent to expire or challenge its validity in court.

What are the key metrics for evaluating the scope and quality of the '085 patent?

The key metrics include independent claim length and independent claim count, which indicate the specificity and balance of the patent claims.

What is the significance of the '085 patent being listed in the FDA's Orange Book?

The listing in the Orange Book requires generic drug manufacturers to certify whether their product infringes the '085 patent or if the patent is invalid, triggering potential litigation.

How have legal battles impacted the '085 patent?

Legal battles, such as those involving Dr. Reddy's Laboratories and Teva Pharmaceuticals, have contested the validity and infringement of the '085 patent, affecting its enforcement and the generic drug market.

Sources

  1. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. v. ASTRAZENECA AB - Casetext
  2. ASTRAZENECA AB v. RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. - Casetext
  3. Patent Claims and Patent Scope - Hoover Institution
  4. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT - GovInfo
  5. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY - Finnegan

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,369,085

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,369,085

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Sweden9702065May 30, 1997
PCT Information
PCT FiledMay 05, 1998PCT Application Number:PCT/SE98/00974
PCT Publication Date:December 03, 1998PCT Publication Number: WO98/54171

International Family Members for US Patent 6,369,085

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0984957 ⤷  Subscribe PA2011005 Lithuania ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0984957 ⤷  Subscribe C300483 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0984957 ⤷  Subscribe 91871 Luxembourg ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.