You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,423,686


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,423,686
Title: LHRH antagonist peptides
Abstract:Methods of treating a subject having a disorder associated with LHRH activity are disclosed.
Inventor(s): Roeske; Roger W. (Indianapolis, IN)
Assignee: Advanced Research & Technology Institute (Indianapolis, IN)
Application Number:08/973,378
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 6,423,686: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for navigating the complex landscape of intellectual property. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 6,423,686, exploring its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape it inhabits.

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of any patent application, defining the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. They must be clear, concise, and supported by the patent's specification[3].

Overview of U.S. Patent 6,423,686

While the specific details of U.S. Patent 6,423,686 are not provided in the sources, we can infer general principles from similar patents and patent analysis techniques.

Patent Type and Classification

To analyze the patent, one must first identify its type (utility, design, or plant) and classification. Utility patents, like the ones discussed in the Cellect case, typically cover functional inventions and are the most common type[1].

Claims Structure

The claims of a patent are structured in a hierarchical manner, with independent claims standing alone and dependent claims referring back to independent claims. Each claim must be supported by the specification and drawings of the patent[3].

Analyzing the Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent is determined by its claims. Here are some key aspects to consider:

Independent and Dependent Claims

Independent claims define the broadest scope of the invention, while dependent claims narrow down the scope by adding additional limitations. For example, in the Cellect case, claims were analyzed for obviousness-type double patenting (ODP), which involves comparing claims across related patents[1].

Claim Coverage Matrix

A Claim Coverage Matrix is a tool used to map which patents and claims are actively protecting specific technologies. This matrix helps in identifying gaps or opportunities in the patent coverage. By categorizing patents by claims and scope concepts, companies can efficiently analyze large numbers of patent claims[5].

Scope Concepts

Scope concepts are overarching themes that link claims on similar patents. These concepts provide a powerful categorization tool for filtering, searching, and analyzing patent claims. They help in determining whether a particular scope concept is applicable to a target product or method[5].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Analyzing the patent landscape involves understanding the broader context in which the patent exists.

Related Patents and Continuations

Patents can be part of a larger family, including continuations, continuations-in-part, and divisional applications. Each of these can have different expiration dates and patent term adjustments (PTA), as seen in the Cellect case where different family members had varying PTA grants[1].

Patent Term Adjustments

Patent Term Adjustments (PTA) can extend the life of a patent due to delays in the prosecution process. Understanding these adjustments is crucial for determining the actual expiration date of a patent and its impact on the patent landscape[1].

Regulatory and Legal Considerations

Patents must comply with various regulatory and legal requirements. For instance, the USPTO's rules on obviousness-type double patenting (ODP) can invalidate claims if they are deemed obvious variants of prior-expiring reference patents[1].

Tools and Techniques for Analysis

Several tools and techniques are available for analyzing patent claims and the patent landscape:

Patent Claims Research Dataset

The USPTO provides the Patent Claims Research Dataset, which contains detailed information on claims from U.S. patents granted between 1976 and 2014. This dataset can be used to analyze claim-level statistics and document-level statistics, providing insights into patent scope and trends[3].

Claim Charts and Software

Tools like ClaimScape® software generate interactive claim charts that help in reviewing patent coverage. These charts are useful for technical experts to determine whether a particular scope concept is applicable to a target product or method[5].

Practical Applications and Strategies

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is not just theoretical; it has practical implications for businesses.

Identifying Gaps and Opportunities

By analyzing the patent landscape, companies can identify gaps in their current coverage and highlight future design opportunities. This helps in strategic planning and innovation[5].

Managing Patent Portfolios

Effective management of patent portfolios involves categorizing patents by claims and scope concepts. This approach helps in maintaining high-value patents and deciding which patents are worth maintaining or abandoning[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Analysis: The heart of any patent, claims define the scope of protection and must be clear and supported by the specification.
  • Scope Concepts: Overarching themes that link claims on similar patents, helping in efficient analysis and identification of gaps or opportunities.
  • Patent Landscape: Understanding related patents, continuations, and regulatory considerations is crucial for navigating the patent landscape.
  • Tools and Techniques: Utilize datasets and software tools to analyze claim-level statistics and document-level statistics.
  • Practical Applications: Identify gaps, highlight opportunities, and manage patent portfolios effectively.

FAQs

What are the key components of a patent claim?

The key components of a patent claim include independent and dependent claims, which together define the scope of the invention. Independent claims stand alone, while dependent claims refer back to independent claims.

How do Patent Term Adjustments (PTA) affect a patent's expiration date?

PTA can extend the life of a patent due to delays in the prosecution process. Each day of delay can result in a corresponding extension of the patent term, as specified under 35 U.S.C. § 154(b)[1].

What is the purpose of a Claim Coverage Matrix?

A Claim Coverage Matrix helps in mapping which patents and claims are actively protecting specific technologies, identifying gaps or opportunities in the patent coverage, and categorizing patents by claims and scope concepts[5].

How can companies manage their patent portfolios effectively?

Companies can manage their patent portfolios by categorizing patents by claims and scope concepts, using tools like ClaimScape® software to generate interactive claim charts, and regularly reviewing and updating their patent coverage to identify gaps and opportunities[5].

What is the significance of scope concepts in patent analysis?

Scope concepts are overarching themes that link claims on similar patents, providing a powerful categorization tool for filtering, searching, and analyzing large numbers of patent claims. They help in determining the applicability of a particular scope concept to a target product or method[5].

Sources

  1. In re Cellect - United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit[1].
  2. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) - USAGov[2].
  3. Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO[3].
  4. DDR Holdings - United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit[4].
  5. Patent Analytics - Intellectual Property Law[5].

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,423,686

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 6,423,686

PCT Information
PCT FiledJune 07, 1996PCT Application Number:PCT/US96/09852
PCT Publication Date:December 19, 1996PCT Publication Number: WO96/40757

International Family Members for US Patent 6,423,686

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0794961 ⤷  Subscribe 91225 Luxembourg ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0794961 ⤷  Subscribe CA 2011 00004 Denmark ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0794961 ⤷  Subscribe C300484 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0794961 ⤷  Subscribe 91857 Luxembourg ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.