You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,689,275


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,689,275
Title: Method and pharmaceutical composition for replacing iron losses in dialysis patients
Abstract:A method of replacing iron losses during dialysis of patients is accomplished by infusion of a noncolloidal ferric compound, soluble in hemodialysis solutions, during dialysis. A pharmaceutical composition is provided consisting essentially of dialysis solution including a soluble noncolloidial ferric compound, preferably ferric pyrophosphate.
Inventor(s): Gupta; Ajay (Farmington Hills, MI)
Assignee:
Application Number:08/775,595
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of a US Patent: A Detailed Analysis of US Patent 6,689,275

Introduction

When navigating the complex world of patents, understanding the scope and claims of a particular patent is crucial for inventors, businesses, and legal professionals. This article will delve into the specifics of US Patent 6,689,275, providing a comprehensive analysis of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape.

What is US Patent 6,689,275?

To begin, it is essential to identify the subject matter of US Patent 6,689,275. This patent, like any other, is a grant of a property right to the inventor(s) for their invention. The patent document includes detailed descriptions of the invention, claims that define the scope of the invention, and background information.

Determining Inventorship

Before diving into the claims, it is important to ensure that the inventors listed on the patent are the true and only inventors. US patent law stipulates that whoever "invents" patentable subject matter is entitled to a patent. This involves the conception of the idea and the reduction of the idea to practice[2].

Understanding Patent Claims

Patent claims are the most critical part of any patent application. They define the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. Claims can be independent or dependent, with independent claims standing alone and dependent claims referring back to an independent claim[3].

Types of Claims

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and do not refer to any other claims. They are broad and define the overall scope of the invention.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims refer back to an independent claim and are narrower in scope. They often add additional limitations to the independent claim.

Claim Construction

Claim construction is a legal process that determines the meaning and scope of the claims. This is a question of law reviewed de novo on appeal. The claims must inform those skilled in the art with reasonable certainty what is covered by the patent[5].

Analyzing the Claims of US Patent 6,689,275

To analyze the claims of US Patent 6,689,275, one must carefully read through the claim section of the patent document.

Independent Claims

Independent claims in US Patent 6,689,275 would outline the broadest scope of the invention. For example, if the patent is related to a medical device, an independent claim might describe the overall structure and function of the device.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims would then narrow down the scope by adding specific details or limitations. For instance, a dependent claim might specify a particular material used in the device or a specific method of operation.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the patent landscape involves identifying where the patent fits within the broader context of existing patents and technological developments.

Claim Coverage Matrix

A Claim Coverage Matrix can help in categorizing patents by claims and scope concepts. This tool is useful for identifying which patents and claims are actively protecting the intellectual property and where gaps or opportunities exist[3].

Global Dossier

The Global Dossier service provided by the USPTO allows users to see the patent family for a specific application, including related applications filed at participating IP Offices. This can help in understanding the global reach and relatedness of the patent[4].

Trends in Patent Allowance Rates

The probability of receiving a US patent has been a subject of study. Research indicates that only about 55.8% of patent applications filed between 1996 and 2005 were granted without using continuation procedures. The allowance rate has decreased over time, particularly in fields like Drugs and Medical Instruments and Computers and Communications[1].

Importance of Correct Inventorship

Correctly determining who should be listed as an inventor is crucial. Incorrect or incomplete identification of inventors can lead to challenges to the patent's enforceability. A thorough job of invention disclosure ensures that the patent remains enforceable[2].

Using Patent Analytics

Patent analytics tools, such as those provided by Schwegman, can help in tracking patents by claims and scope concepts. These tools generate interactive claim charts that can be reviewed by technical experts to determine the applicability of the patent claims to target products or methods[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims: The claims section of a patent is critical as it defines the scope of the invention.
  • Claim Construction: This is a legal process that determines the meaning and scope of the claims.
  • Patent Landscape: Understanding the broader patent landscape helps in identifying gaps and opportunities.
  • Inventorship: Correct identification of inventors is essential for the patent's enforceability.
  • Patent Analytics: Tools like Claim Coverage Matrix and Global Dossier are invaluable for analyzing patent claims and landscape.

FAQs

Q: What is the significance of independent and dependent claims in a patent?

A: Independent claims define the broadest scope of the invention, while dependent claims narrow down the scope by adding specific details or limitations.

Q: How can one determine the true and only inventors for a US patent application?

A: US patent law requires that the inventors listed are those who conceived the idea and reduced it to practice. This involves a thorough job of invention disclosure to ensure the patent remains enforceable[2].

Q: What is the purpose of a Claim Coverage Matrix in patent analytics?

A: A Claim Coverage Matrix helps in categorizing patents by claims and scope concepts, identifying which patents and claims are actively protecting the intellectual property and where gaps or opportunities exist[3].

Q: How has the allowance rate for US patent applications changed over time?

A: The allowance rate for US patent applications has decreased substantially over time, particularly in fields like Drugs and Medical Instruments and Computers and Communications[1].

Q: What is the Global Dossier service provided by the USPTO?

A: The Global Dossier service allows users to see the patent family for a specific application, including related applications filed at participating IP Offices, along with dossier, classification, and citation data[4].

Sources

  1. Carley, M., Hegde, D., & Marco, A. (2015). What Is the Probability of Receiving a US Patent? Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 17, 203.
  2. Gattari, A. (n.d.). Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications. Oregon State University.
  3. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. (n.d.). Patent Analytics. SLWIP.
  4. United States Patent and Trademark Office. (n.d.). Search for patents. USPTO.
  5. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. (2024). VASCULAR SOLUTIONS LLC v. MEDTRONIC, INC. CAFC.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,689,275

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,689,275

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 311180 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 5617298 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 736053 ⤷  Subscribe
Brazil 9713653 ⤷  Subscribe
Canada 2276442 ⤷  Subscribe
Germany 69734781 ⤷  Subscribe
Denmark 0951470 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.