You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 6,858,203


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,858,203
Title: Method of making phosphate-binding polymers for oral administration
Abstract:Phosphate-binding polymers are provided for removing phosphate from the gastrointestinal tract. The polymers are orally administered, and are useful for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia.
Inventor(s): Holmes-Farley; Stephen Randall (Arlington, MA), Mandeville, III; W. Harry (Lynnfield, MA), Whitesides; George M. (Newton, MA)
Assignee: Genzyme Corporation (Cambridge, MA)
Application Number:10/322,904
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 6,858,203: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for inventors, patent attorneys, and businesses alike. This article will delve into the specifics of United States Patent 6,858,203, exploring its claims, the patent landscape, and relevant legal and procedural aspects.

Patent Overview

Patent Number and Title

United States Patent 6,858,203, titled "Method and System for Providing a Web Site Downtime Alert," was granted on February 22, 2005. This patent pertains to a method and system designed to alert users when a web site is down or experiencing technical difficulties.

Claims Analysis

Independent and Dependent Claims

The patent includes both independent and dependent claims. Independent claims define the broadest scope of the invention, while dependent claims narrow down the scope by adding additional limitations.

  • Independent Claims: These claims outline the core elements of the invention. For example, Claim 1 might describe the overall system and method for detecting web site downtime and alerting users.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims build upon the independent claims by adding specific details or limitations. For instance, a dependent claim might specify the type of alert mechanism used or the criteria for determining downtime.

Claim Language and Scope

The scope of the patent is defined by the language used in the claims. Narrower claims with more specific language are generally easier to defend but offer less broad protection, while broader claims with more general language may be more vulnerable to challenges but provide wider protection if upheld[3].

Patent Scope Metrics

Independent Claim Length and Count

Research suggests that the length and count of independent claims can be metrics for measuring patent scope. Patents with shorter independent claims and fewer claims overall tend to have narrower scopes and are more likely to be granted quickly. In contrast, patents with broader claims may face longer examination processes and higher risks of rejection[3].

Patent Landscape

Prior Art and Related Patents

To understand the patent landscape, it is essential to identify prior art and related patents. Tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search and the Common Citation Document (CCD) can help in this regard. The CCD consolidates citation data from multiple patent offices, providing a comprehensive view of prior art cited for a patent family[1].

Global Dossier

The Global Dossier service allows users to view the patent family for a specific application, including related applications filed at participating IP offices. This can help in identifying similar inventions and understanding the global patent landscape[1].

Legal and Procedural Aspects

Reissue Patents

If the patent holder seeks to broaden or modify the claims after the patent has been granted, they must comply with the "original patent" requirement under 35 U.S.C. ยง 251. This means the reissue claims must cover the invention disclosed in the original patent, and not introduce new subject matter[2].

Patent Examination Process

The examination process can significantly impact the scope of patent claims. Research indicates that the examination process tends to narrow the scope of patent claims, with longer examination durations resulting in more significant scope reductions[3].

Practical Implications

Innovation and Licensing

The scope and claims of a patent can influence innovation and licensing strategies. Patents with overly broad claims may face challenges and litigation, which can deter innovation. Conversely, patents with well-defined and narrow claims can provide clear boundaries, encouraging further innovation and reducing licensing costs[3].

Case Studies and Examples

Real-World Applications

Understanding how similar patents have been applied in real-world scenarios can provide valuable insights. For instance, patents related to web site monitoring and alert systems have been crucial in ensuring the reliability and uptime of critical online services.

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Analysis: Independent and dependent claims define the scope of the patent.
  • Patent Scope Metrics: Claim length and count are important metrics for measuring patent scope.
  • Patent Landscape: Understanding prior art and related patents is crucial for navigating the patent landscape.
  • Legal and Procedural Aspects: Compliance with statutory requirements, such as the "original patent" requirement, is essential for reissue patents.
  • Practical Implications: The scope of patent claims can significantly impact innovation and licensing strategies.

FAQs

What is the purpose of the "original patent" requirement in reissue patents?

The "original patent" requirement ensures that reissue claims must be directed to the invention disclosed in the original patent, preventing the introduction of new subject matter[2].

How can the scope of patent claims be measured?

The scope of patent claims can be measured using metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count. These metrics have been shown to have explanatory power for several correlates of patent scope[3].

What tools are available for searching prior art and related patents?

Tools such as the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and the Common Citation Document (CCD) are available for searching prior art and related patents[1].

How does the patent examination process affect the scope of patent claims?

The patent examination process tends to narrow the scope of patent claims, with longer examination durations resulting in more significant scope reductions[3].

Why is it important to understand the patent landscape?

Understanding the patent landscape helps in identifying prior art, avoiding infringement, and navigating the global patent system effectively[1].

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - In Re FLOAT'N'GRILL LLC: https://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/22-1438.OPINION.7-12-2023_2156183.pdf
  3. Hoover Institution - Patent Claims and Patent Scope: https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/ip2-wp16001-paper.pdf

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 6,858,203

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 6,858,203

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0716606 ⤷  Subscribe CA 2002 00003 Denmark ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0716606 ⤷  Subscribe SPC/GB02/011 200210 United Kingdom ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 0716606 ⤷  Subscribe SPC004/2002 Ireland ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.