You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 7,214,683


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,214,683
Title:Compositions of descarboethoxyloratadine
Abstract:Methods are disclosed utilizing DCL, a metabolic derivative of loratadine, for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, and other disorders, while avoiding the concomitant liability of adverse side-effects associated with other non-sedating antihistamines.
Inventor(s): Aberg; A. K. Gunnar (Westborough, MA), McCullough; John R. (Worcester, MA), Smith; Emil R. (Shrewsbury, MA)
Assignee: Sepracor Inc. (Marlborough, MA)
Application Number:09/039,260
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 7,214,683

Introduction

United States Patent 7,214,683, hereafter referred to as the '683 patent, is a significant intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly related to the drug Clarinex® (desloratadine). This patent is owned by Sepracor (now part of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals) and the University of Massachusetts (UMass). Here, we will delve into the details of the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape.

Background of the Patent

The '683 patent is associated with the development and commercialization of desloratadine, an antihistamine used to treat allergies. The patent protects specific formulations, methods of use, and other aspects related to this drug.

Patent Claims

The claims of a patent are crucial as they define the scope of the invention and what is protected under the patent. Here are some key aspects of the claims in the '683 patent:

Independent Claims

Independent claims in a patent are standalone claims that do not depend on other claims. For the '683 patent, these claims typically include:

  • Composition Claims: These claims cover the specific formulations of desloratadine, including the active ingredient and any excipients.
  • Method of Use Claims: These claims describe the methods by which the drug is administered and used to treat specific conditions, such as allergies.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims build upon the independent claims and provide additional specificity. For example:

  • Dosage Forms: Claims might specify particular dosage forms, such as orally disintegrating tablets.
  • Dosage Regimens: These claims could outline the recommended dosages and frequency of administration.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of the '683 patent is defined by its claims and the description provided in the patent specification.

Product Protection

The patent protects the specific product formulations of desloratadine, ensuring that any generic versions must differ significantly to avoid infringement.

Method Protection

The methods of use and administration are also protected, which means that any generic drug maker must either use a different method or obtain permission from the patent holders.

Patent Landscape

The patent landscape surrounding the '683 patent involves several key elements:

Related Patents

Other patents related to Clarinex®, such as United States Patent Nos. 7,211,582 and 7,214,684, also owned by Sepracor and UMass, form a protective umbrella around the drug. These patents may cover different aspects of the drug, such as manufacturing processes or additional formulations[2].

Global Dossier and International Protection

The Global Dossier service provided by the USPTO allows users to view the patent family for a specific application, including related applications filed at participating IP Offices. This service helps in understanding the global protection landscape for the '683 patent and related patents[1].

Litigation History

The '683 patent has been involved in several patent infringement cases. For instance, Sepracor and UMass sued Orchid Pharmaceuticals for filing Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) with the FDA, which allegedly infringed on the '683 patent among others. This highlights the active enforcement of the patent rights by the owners[2][5].

Economic and Strategic Impact

The '683 patent has significant economic and strategic implications:

Market Exclusivity

By protecting the specific formulations and methods of use, the patent ensures market exclusivity for the branded drug Clarinex®, allowing Sepracor and UMass to maintain a competitive edge in the market.

Generic Competition

The patent's expiration date is crucial as it determines when generic versions of the drug can enter the market. Generic drug makers must wait until the patent expires or obtain permission to market their versions, which can significantly impact the market dynamics[2].

Tools for Patent Analysis

Several tools and resources are available for analyzing patents like the '683 patent:

Patent Public Search

The USPTO's Patent Public Search tool provides enhanced access to prior art and allows users to search and analyze patent documents effectively[1].

Patent Claims Research Dataset

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset offers detailed information on claims from US patents, including claim-level statistics and document-level statistics. This dataset can be used to analyze the scope and trends of patent claims[3].

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The CCD application consolidates citation data from participating IP Offices, enabling users to visualize the prior art cited by multiple offices for the same invention. This is particularly useful for understanding the global citation landscape of the '683 patent[1].

Conclusion

The '683 patent is a critical asset in the pharmaceutical industry, protecting the drug Clarinex® and its related formulations and methods of use. Understanding the scope and claims of this patent, along with its place in the broader patent landscape, is essential for both the patent holders and potential generic competitors.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims: The '683 patent includes composition and method of use claims that define its scope.
  • Scope of Protection: The patent protects specific formulations and methods of use for desloratadine.
  • Related Patents: Other patents related to Clarinex® form a protective umbrella around the drug.
  • Litigation History: The patent has been involved in several infringement cases.
  • Economic Impact: The patent ensures market exclusivity and affects generic competition.
  • Tools for Analysis: Resources like Patent Public Search and the Patent Claims Research Dataset are crucial for analyzing the patent.

FAQs

  1. What is the '683 patent related to?

    • The '683 patent is related to the drug Clarinex® (desloratadine), specifically its formulations and methods of use.
  2. Who owns the '683 patent?

    • The '683 patent is owned by Sepracor (now part of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals) and the University of Massachusetts (UMass).
  3. What are the key claims of the '683 patent?

    • The key claims include composition claims for the specific formulations of desloratadine and method of use claims for its administration.
  4. How does the '683 patent impact generic competition?

    • The patent prevents generic versions of Clarinex® from entering the market until it expires or unless the generic drug maker obtains permission.
  5. What tools can be used to analyze the '683 patent?

    • Tools such as the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and the Patent Claims Research Dataset can be used to analyze the patent.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents
  2. Case 3:07-cv-04623-MLC-TJB Document 1 Filed 09/26/07
  3. USPTO - Patent Claims Research Dataset
  4. RaySearch Laboratories Annual Report 2020
  5. GenomeWeb - Sepracor, UMass Sue Generic Drug Maker For Allegedly Infringing Clarinex Patents

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,214,683

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.