You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 7,700,645


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 7,700,645 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 7,700,645 protects SYMTUZA, PREZISTA, and PREZCOBIX, and is included in four NDAs.

Protection for PREZISTA has been extended six months for pediatric studies, as indicated by the *PED designation in the table below.

This patent has forty-eight patent family members in twenty-five countries.

Summary for Patent: 7,700,645
Title:Pseudopolymorphic forms of a HIV protease inhibitor
Abstract: New pseudopolymorphic forms of (3R,3aS,6aR)-hexahydrofuro[2,3-b]furan-3-yl(1S,2R)-3-[[(4-aminophenyl)sul- fonyl](isobutyl)amino]-1-benzyl-2-hydroxypropylcarbamate and processes for producing them are disclosed.
Inventor(s): Vermeersch; Hans Wim Pieter (Ghent, BE), Thone; Daniel Joseph Christiaan (Beerse, BE), Janssens; Luc Donne Marie-Louise (Malle, BE)
Assignee: Tibotec Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Little Island, Co. Cork, IE)
Application Number:10/514,352
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 7,700,645
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 7,700,645: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

The United States Patent 7,700,645, titled "Pseudopolymorphic forms of a HIV protease inhibitor," is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in the field of HIV treatment. This patent, assigned to Janssen R&D Ireland, covers various pseudopolymorphic forms of the HIV protease inhibitor darunavir. Here, we will delve into the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding this invention.

Background and Invention

The patent focuses on pseudopolymorphic forms of darunavir, a crucial drug in the treatment of HIV. Pseudopolymorphism refers to the ability of a compound to exist in multiple solid forms, such as solvates or hydrates, which can affect the drug's stability, bioavailability, and overall efficacy[4].

Scope of the Patent

The scope of the patent is defined by its claims, which outline the specific aspects of the invention that are protected. Here are some key aspects:

Claims Overview

  • The patent includes claims related to the pseudopolymorphic forms of darunavir, including specific solvates and hydrates.
  • It also covers methods for producing these forms and their use in treating HIV viral diseases[4].

Claim Construction

In the context of patent litigation, claim construction is critical. For example, in the case of Janssen Prods., L.P. v. Lupin Ltd., the court construed the term "solvate" in the asserted claims of the '645 Patent to mean "a crystal form that contains stoichiometric or non-stoichiometric amounts of solvent"[1].

Patent Claims

The patent claims are the heart of the intellectual property protection. Here are some key claims:

Independent Claims

  • Claim 1 typically sets the broadest scope of the invention, defining the pseudopolymorphic forms of darunavir.
  • Subsequent claims may narrow down the scope by specifying particular solvates, hydrates, or methods of production[4].

Dependent Claims

  • These claims build upon the independent claims, adding additional limitations and specifics. For example, claims might specify particular ratios of solvent to darunavir or specific conditions for crystallization.

Patent Landscape

Understanding the broader patent landscape is essential for navigating the intellectual property rights in this field.

Related Patents

  • Other patents related to darunavir and its formulations include U.S. Patent No. 7,126,015 B2 and U.S. Patent No. 7,772,411 B2, which also cover aspects of darunavir's production and use[2].
  • Patents like U.S. Patent 8,518,987, also assigned to Janssen R&D Ireland, further expand on pseudopolymorphic forms and their production processes[2].

Patent Expiration Dates

  • The '645 Patent is set to expire on December 26, 2026, which marks the end of the exclusive rights granted to the patent holder. After this date, generic versions of the drug could potentially enter the market[2].

Litigation and Enforcement

Patent litigation often revolves around issues of infringement and validity.

Infringement

  • In cases like Janssen Prods., L.P. v. Lupin Ltd., the court found that certain generic manufacturers infringed on the claims of the '015 Patent, which is related to the '645 Patent. This highlights the importance of enforcing patent rights against potential infringers[1].

Validity Challenges

  • Defendants in patent litigation must overcome the presumption of validity by clear and convincing evidence. In the Janssen Prods., L.P. v. Lupin Ltd. case, the defendants failed to meet this burden, affirming the validity of the patents-in-suit[1].

Impact on Innovation and Competition

The scope and claims of the '645 Patent have significant implications for innovation and competition in the pharmaceutical industry.

Innovation Incentives

  • Patents like the '645 Patent provide incentives for innovation by granting exclusive rights to the inventors, allowing them to recoup their investment in research and development[3].

Competition

  • The expiration of patents can open up the market to generic competition, which can drive down prices and increase access to life-saving medications. However, the complex patent landscape around darunavir may delay the entry of generics until all relevant patents expire[2].

Metrics for Patent Scope

Research on patent scope can provide insights into the breadth and clarity of patent claims.

Independent Claim Length and Count

  • Studies have shown that narrower claims, measured by independent claim length and count, are associated with a higher probability of grant and a shorter examination process. This suggests that the '645 Patent, with its specific claims on pseudopolymorphic forms, likely underwent rigorous examination to ensure its validity[3].

Conclusion on Patent Quality

The '645 Patent exemplifies the complexities and nuances of patent law in the pharmaceutical sector.

Patent Quality Concerns

  • Debates over patent quality often focus on the breadth and clarity of claims. The '645 Patent, with its detailed specifications and narrow claims, addresses some of these concerns by providing clear and specific protections for the invention[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Specific Claims: The '645 Patent includes specific claims on pseudopolymorphic forms of darunavir, which are crucial for the drug's stability and efficacy.
  • Patent Expiration: The patent is set to expire on December 26, 2026, marking the end of exclusive rights.
  • Litigation: The patent has been involved in significant litigation, affirming its validity and enforcing its claims against generic manufacturers.
  • Innovation and Competition: The patent provides incentives for innovation but also affects competition by delaying the entry of generic versions until its expiration.
  • Patent Scope Metrics: The patent's claims are narrow and specific, aligning with best practices for patent scope and clarity.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is the main subject of U.S. Patent 7,700,645?

The main subject is the pseudopolymorphic forms of the HIV protease inhibitor darunavir.

When is the '645 Patent set to expire?

The '645 Patent is set to expire on December 26, 2026.

What are the implications of the '645 Patent for generic drug manufacturers?

The patent prevents generic manufacturers from producing and selling darunavir in its protected forms until the patent expires.

How does the '645 Patent impact innovation in the pharmaceutical industry?

The patent provides exclusive rights to the inventors, incentivizing further research and development in the field.

What are some related patents to the '645 Patent?

Related patents include U.S. Patent No. 7,126,015 B2 and U.S. Patent No. 7,772,411 B2, also covering aspects of darunavir.

Cited Sources

  1. Janssen Prods., L.P. v. Lupin Ltd. - Casetext
  2. Generic Prezcobix Availability - Drugs.com
  3. Patent Claims and Patent Scope - Hoover Institution
  4. US7700645B2 - Pseudopolymorphic forms of a HIV protease inhibitor - Google Patents

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 7,700,645

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Janssen Prods SYMTUZA cobicistat; darunavir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate TABLET;ORAL 210455-001 Jul 17, 2018 RX Yes Yes 7,700,645 ⤷  Subscribe Y Y ⤷  Subscribe
Janssen Prods PREZISTA darunavir SUSPENSION;ORAL 202895-001 Dec 16, 2011 RX Yes Yes 7,700,645*PED ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Janssen Prods PREZCOBIX cobicistat; darunavir TABLET;ORAL 205395-001 Jan 29, 2015 RX Yes Yes 7,700,645*PED ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Janssen Prods PREZISTA darunavir TABLET;ORAL 021976-004 Dec 18, 2008 RX Yes No 7,700,645*PED ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 7,700,645

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
02076929May 16, 2002
PCT Information
PCT FiledMay 16, 2003PCT Application Number:PCT/EP03/50176
PCT Publication Date:December 24, 2003PCT Publication Number: WO03/106461

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.