You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 8,217,078


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,217,078 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,217,078 protects PENNSAID and is included in two NDAs.

Summary for Patent: 8,217,078
Title:Treatment of pain with topical diclofenac
Abstract: The field involves compositions useful for pain relief, including diclofenac solution and gel formulations, in particular methods of use thereof, articles of manufacture and kits that provide novel preclinical, clinical and other information to users.
Inventor(s): Singh; Jagat (Scarborough, CA), Shainhouse; Joseph Zev (North York, CA), Galer; Bradley S. (West Chester, PA), King-Smith; Robert Dominic (San Diego, CA), Grierson; Lisa Marie (Richmond Hill, CA), Burian; Maria (Stolberg, DE), Wilkin; Jonathan (Columbus, OH), Kisak; Edward T. (San Diego, CA), Newsam; John M. (La Jolla, CA)
Assignee: Nuvo Research Inc. (Mississauga, CA)
Application Number:12/914,867
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,217,078
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 8,217,078: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent 8,217,078, titled "Treatment of pain with topical diclofenac," is a significant patent in the field of pharmaceuticals, particularly for pain relief. This patent, part of a broader family of patents related to the drug Pennsaid, is crucial for understanding the treatment of osteoarthritis pain using topical diclofenac formulations.

Background

The patent in question is associated with Pennsaid, the first FDA-approved twice-daily topical diclofenac sodium formulation for treating the pain of osteoarthritis of the knees. This innovation marked a significant advancement in pain management, offering an alternative to oral NSAIDs and their associated gastrointestinal side effects[2].

Scope of the Patent

Claims and Specifications

The patent includes several claims that define the scope of the invention. These claims cover various aspects of the topical diclofenac formulation, including its composition, method of preparation, and specific properties such as stability and transdermal flux. The claims are supported by a detailed specification that outlines the ingredients, their proportions, and the methods for evaluating the formulation's efficacy and stability[1][2].

Key Ingredients and Formulation

The patent specifies the use of diclofenac sodium as the active ingredient, along with various excipients such as dimethylsulphoxide, propylene glycol, ethanol, and glycerine. These ingredients are crucial for enhancing the transdermal absorption and stability of the formulation[1].

Properties and Performance

The claimed formulation is characterized by several key properties:

  • Better Drying Time: The formulation is designed to dry quickly on the skin, which is a critical factor for patient compliance.
  • Higher Viscosity: This property ensures that the formulation stays on the skin surface long enough to allow adequate absorption.
  • Increased Transdermal Flux: Enhanced absorption through the skin is a key benefit, ensuring that the active ingredient reaches the site of pain effectively.
  • Greater Pharmacokinetic Absorption: The formulation is optimized for better absorption into the bloodstream, leading to more effective pain relief.
  • Favorable Stability: The patent emphasizes the importance of stability over time, ensuring that the formulation remains effective even after storage for several months[2].

Claim Construction and Disputes

Legal Context

The patent was involved in a significant legal case, Horizon Pharma Ireland Ltd. v. Actavis Labs., UT, Inc., where the court addressed issues related to claim construction. The case highlighted the complexities in interpreting terms such as "the formulation degrades by less than 1% over 6 months" and "consisting essentially of," which are critical for defining the scope of the invention[2].

Indefiniteness Issues

The court found several terms in the patent claims to be indefinite, particularly those related to the basic and novel properties of the formulation. For instance, the term "better drying time" was deemed indefinite because the specification provided multiple methods for evaluating drying time without consistent results. This indefiniteness raised concerns about the clarity and enforceability of the patent claims[2].

Patent Landscape

Related Patents

The patent is part of a larger family of patents related to Pennsaid, including U.S. Patents Nos. 8,252,838, 8,563,613, 8,871,809, 9,066,913, 9,101,591, 8,546,450, 8,618,164, and 9,132,110. These patents collectively cover various aspects of the formulation, its preparation, and its use in treating osteoarthritis pain[2].

Global Patent System

The patent landscape for topical diclofenac formulations is complex and global. Tools like the Global Dossier and the Common Citation Document (CCD) application facilitate the analysis of related patent applications across different jurisdictions, helping to identify the broader patent family and prior art[4].

Impact on Innovation and Litigation

Patent Scope and Quality

The debate over patent scope and quality is relevant here. Broader or overly broad patents can lead to increased litigation costs and may diminish incentives for innovation. The analysis of patent scope using metrics such as independent claim length and count can provide insights into the breadth and clarity of the patent claims, which is crucial for maintaining a healthy patent ecosystem[3].

Licensing and Litigation

The legal disputes surrounding this patent highlight the challenges in patent litigation. The indefiniteness of certain claims can lead to prolonged legal battles, affecting the commercialization and licensing of the invention. Clear and well-defined claims are essential for avoiding such issues and ensuring that the patent serves its intended purpose of promoting innovation[2].

Key Takeaways

  • Topical Diclofenac Formulation: The patent covers a specific formulation of topical diclofenac for treating osteoarthritis pain, emphasizing its composition, stability, and transdermal absorption.
  • Claim Construction: The patent was involved in a significant legal case that highlighted the importance of clear and definite claim language.
  • Patent Landscape: The patent is part of a larger family of patents related to Pennsaid, with global implications for pain management treatments.
  • Impact on Innovation: Clear and well-defined patent claims are crucial for promoting innovation and avoiding costly litigation.

FAQs

What is the main focus of United States Patent 8,217,078?

The main focus of this patent is the treatment of pain with topical diclofenac, specifically for osteoarthritis of the knees.

What are the key ingredients in the topical diclofenac formulation?

The key ingredients include diclofenac sodium, dimethylsulphoxide, propylene glycol, ethanol, and glycerine.

What legal issues were raised in the Horizon Pharma Ireland Ltd. v. Actavis Labs., UT, Inc. case?

The case involved disputes over claim construction, particularly the indefiniteness of terms such as "better drying time" and "consisting essentially of."

How does the patent fit into the broader patent landscape?

The patent is part of a larger family of patents related to Pennsaid, with implications for global pain management treatments.

What are the implications of indefinite claims in patent litigation?

Indefinite claims can lead to prolonged legal battles, increased litigation costs, and diminished incentives for innovation.

How can the scope of a patent be measured?

The scope of a patent can be measured using metrics such as independent claim length and count, which provide insights into the breadth and clarity of the patent claims.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,217,078

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Horizon PENNSAID diclofenac sodium SOLUTION;TOPICAL 204623-001 Jan 16, 2014 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe USE OF TOPICAL DICLOFENAC ON THE KNEE AND A SECOND TOPICAL PRESCRIPTION MEDICATION ON THE SAME KNEE ⤷  Subscribe
Nuvo Pharms Inc PENNSAID diclofenac sodium SOLUTION;TOPICAL 020947-001 Nov 4, 2009 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe USE OF TOPICAL DICLOFENAC ON THE KNEE AND A SECOND TOPICAL MEDICATION ON THE SAME KNEE ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.