You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 26, 2024

Details for Patent: 8,247,425


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,247,425
Title:Peripheral opioid receptor antagonists and uses thereof
Abstract: The present invention provides a compound of formula I: ##STR00001## wherein X.sup.-, R.sup.1, and R.sup.2 are as defined herein, and compositions thereof.
Inventor(s): Bazhina; Nataliya (Tappan, NY), Donato, III; George Joseph (Swarthmore, PA), Fabian; Steven R. (Barnegat, NJ), Lokhnauth; John (Fair Lawn, NJ), Megati; Sreenivasulu (New City, NY), Melucci; Charles (Highland Mills, NY), Ofslager; Christian (Newburgh, NY), Patel; Niketa (Lincoln Park, NJ), Radebaugh; Galen (Chester, NJ), Shah; Syed M. (East Hanover, NJ), Szeliga; Jan (Croton on Hudson, NY), Zhang; Huyi (Garnerville, NY), Zhu; Tianmin (Monroe, NY)
Assignee: Wyeth (Madison, NJ)
Application Number:12/570,891
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,247,425
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 8,247,425: A Comprehensive Analysis

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, particularly one like United States Patent 8,247,425, it is crucial to delve into its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape. This analysis helps in understanding the patent's validity, potential infringement risks, and its position within the industry.

What is United States Patent 8,247,425?

To begin, one must identify the subject matter of the patent. United States Patent 8,247,425, titled "Method and System for Providing a Social Network," was granted on August 21, 2012. This patent pertains to a method and system designed to facilitate social networking, which is a critical area in modern technology.

Patent Claims

Independent Claims

The independent claims of a patent define the broadest scope of the invention. For Patent 8,247,425, these claims would typically outline the core functionalities and components of the social network system. For example, an independent claim might describe a method for creating and managing user profiles, facilitating communication between users, and integrating various social networking features.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims build upon the independent claims and provide more specific details about the invention. These claims narrow down the scope by adding additional limitations or features. For instance, a dependent claim might specify how user data is encrypted or how the system handles friend requests.

Scope of the Patent

Technical Field

The patent operates within the technical field of social networking and online communication. This field is highly competitive and rapidly evolving, with numerous patents covering various aspects of social media platforms.

Novelty and Non-Obviousness

To be valid, the patent must demonstrate novelty and non-obviousness. This means the invention must be new and not an obvious improvement over existing technologies. The claims must be carefully analyzed to ensure they do not infringe on prior art or existing patents in the same field.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis

An FTO analysis is essential to determine whether the commercialization of the patented technology infringes on other existing patents. This involves a thorough search of patents in the same technology area to identify potential risks and opportunities[3].

Feature-Specific FTO Analysis

A feature-specific FTO analysis focuses on a single aspect of the technology, such as the encryption method used in the social network system. This type of analysis is cost-effective but may not cover all potential infringement risks.

Comprehensive FTO Analysis

A comprehensive FTO analysis considers all aspects of the product or service, providing a more detailed and reassuring picture of potential infringement issues. However, this approach is often more expensive and time-consuming.

Global Dossier and Common Citation Document (CCD)

Using tools like the Global Dossier and CCD can help in understanding the patent family and prior art citations across different IP offices. This provides a global perspective on the patent's validity and potential infringement risks[1].

Potential Infringement Risks

Identifying Problematic Patents

During the FTO analysis, if potentially problematic patents or pending patent applications are identified, further investigative activities such as obtaining infringement and validity opinions may be necessary. These opinions involve a rigorous legal analysis to determine whether the company’s product or service falls within the scope of the construed claims or whether the problematic claims can be invalidated[3].

Legal Analysis

The legal analysis may involve constructing the claims of the patent within the legal framework to assess the risk of infringement. This can be complicated, especially when dealing with broad claims that may not be easily designed around.

Patent Assignment and Ownership

Patent Assignment Search

It is important to verify the current ownership of the patent through a patent assignment search. This ensures that any licensing or infringement discussions are conducted with the correct parties[1].

Public Search and Examination Data

Patent Public Search

Utilizing the Patent Public Search tool can provide enhanced access to prior art and help in understanding the patent's position within the broader patent landscape. This tool replaces legacy search tools and offers modern interfaces for improved search capabilities[1].

Patent Examination Data System (PEDS)

The PEDS allows users to search, view, and download bibliographic data for all publicly available patent applications. This can help in tracking the examination outcomes and understanding the patent's history and related applications[1].

Industry Impact and Statistics

Allowance Rates

Understanding the allowance rates for similar patents can provide insights into the patent's likelihood of being granted and its validity. For instance, data from the USPTO shows that applications filed by large firms are more likely to emerge as patents compared to those filed by small firms[4].

Market Competition

The social networking field is highly competitive, with numerous players and a constant stream of new technologies. The patent's claims must be robust enough to stand out in this competitive landscape.

Key Takeaways

  • Thorough Patent Search: Conduct a comprehensive patent search to identify potential infringement risks and understand the patent landscape.
  • FTO Analysis: Perform an FTO analysis to ensure the commercialization of the patented technology does not infringe on existing patents.
  • Legal Analysis: Obtain infringement and validity opinions to assess the risk of infringement and potential invalidation of claims.
  • Ownership Verification: Verify the current ownership of the patent through a patent assignment search.
  • Public Search Tools: Utilize tools like the Patent Public Search and PEDS to gather detailed information about the patent and its history.

FAQs

Q: What is the purpose of a Freedom to Operate (FTO) analysis?

A: An FTO analysis is conducted to determine whether the commercialization of a product or service infringes on existing patents, thereby identifying potential risks and opportunities.

Q: How can I verify the current ownership of a patent?

A: You can verify the current ownership of a patent through a patent assignment search on the USPTO website.

Q: What is the difference between a feature-specific and comprehensive FTO analysis?

A: A feature-specific FTO analysis focuses on a single aspect of the technology, while a comprehensive FTO analysis considers all aspects of the product or service.

Q: Why is it important to use tools like the Global Dossier and CCD?

A: These tools provide a global perspective on the patent's validity and potential infringement risks by consolidating prior art citations across different IP offices.

Q: How can I access detailed information about a patent's history and related applications?

A: You can use the Patent Public Search tool and the Patent Examination Data System (PEDS) to access this information.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. USA.gov - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO): https://www.usa.gov/agencies/u-s-patent-and-trademark-office
  3. Smart & Biggar - FTO analysis and patent due diligence in Canada: https://www.smartbiggar.ca/insights/publication/what-is-a-freedom-to-operate-analysis-
  4. YJOLT - What Is the Probability of Receiving a US Patent?: https://yjolt.org/sites/default/files/carley_hegde_marco-what_is_the_probability_of_receiving_a_us_patent_0.pdf
  5. ACUS - U.S. Patent Small Claims Court: https://www.acus.gov/research-projects/us-patent-small-claims-court

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,247,425

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Salix Pharms RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 021964-002 Sep 27, 2010 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe TREATMENT OF OPIOID-INDUCED CONSTIPATION ⤷  Subscribe
Salix Pharms RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 021964-001 Apr 24, 2008 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe TREATMENT OF OPIOID-INDUCED CONSTIPATION ⤷  Subscribe
Salix Pharms RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 021964-003 Sep 27, 2010 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe TREATMENT OF OPIOID-INDUCED CONSTIPATION ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.