You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 8,278,292


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,278,292 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,278,292 protects PICATO and is included in one NDA.

This patent has thirty-three patent family members in twenty-one countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,278,292
Title:Therapeutic compositions
Abstract: Ingenol angelate is a potent anticancer agent, and can be stabilized by dissolving it in an aprotic solvent in the presence of an acidic buffer.
Inventor(s): Brown; Marc Barry (Watford, GB), Crowthers; Michael Edward Donald (Hillsborough, GB), Nazir; Tahir (Isleworth, GB)
Assignee: LEO Laboroatories Limited (Dublin, IE)
Application Number:12/097,258
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,278,292
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 8,278,292: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

The United States Patent 8,278,292, hereafter referred to as the '292 patent, is a crucial component of LEO Pharma's intellectual property portfolio, particularly in relation to their drug Picato®, which is used for the treatment of skin cancers. This patent is part of a broader set of patents that protect the therapeutic compositions and methods related to ingenol mebutate.

Background

The '292 patent was issued on October 2, 2012, and is titled "Therapeutic compositions." It is associated with the treatment of skin cancers using compounds obtainable from Euphorbia species, specifically ingenol mebutate[4].

Patent Scope and Claims

Independent Claims

The '292 patent includes several independent claims that define the scope of the invention. These claims are critical in determining the patent's breadth and the protection it offers.

  • Claim 1: This claim typically sets the foundation for the invention, describing the therapeutic composition comprising ingenol mebutate or its derivatives, formulated for topical application[4].

  • Dependent Claims: The dependent claims further specify various aspects of the composition, such as the concentration of ingenol mebutate, the type of solvents used, and the formulation's stability.

Claim Language and Scope

The claim language in the '292 patent is detailed and specific, which helps in defining the exact scope of the invention. For instance, the patent specifies the use of protic solvents to achieve the requisite stability of the formulation, addressing a common problem of rearrangement that occurs when such solvents are used[1].

Patent Landscape

Related Patents

The '292 patent is part of a larger family of patents held by LEO Pharma, including but not limited to:

  • United States Patent Nos. 7,410,656, 8,372,827, 8,372,828, 8,377,919, 8,536,163, 8,716,271, 8,735,375, 9,676,698, and 9,416,084: These patents collectively cover various aspects of ingenol mebutate formulations, production methods, and their applications[1][2][5].

  • Process Patents (9,416,084 and 9,676,698): These patents specifically cover the methods of producing ingenol mebutate and share a common specification and inventors[2].

Litigation and Enforcement

The '292 patent has been involved in several litigation cases, particularly in the context of Hatch-Waxman suits. LEO Pharma has alleged infringement by various generic drug manufacturers, including Actavis and Perrigo, who have filed Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) for generic versions of Picato®[1][5].

Claim Construction and Interpretation

In the context of litigation, the claim construction of the '292 patent has been a subject of debate. The court's recommendations on claim constructions are crucial in determining the scope of protection. For example, the court has considered the specification and the inventors' intent to interpret the claim terms accurately[1].

Patent Quality and Scope Metrics

Research on patent scope metrics suggests that the length and count of independent claims can be indicative of the patent's breadth and quality. The '292 patent, with its detailed and specific claims, aligns with the metrics that suggest narrower claims are often associated with a higher probability of grant and shorter examination processes[3].

Innovation and Licensing

The '292 patent, along with other related patents, plays a significant role in protecting LEO Pharma's innovation in the field of skin cancer treatments. This protection is essential for maintaining incentives for further research and development, despite the potential for increased licensing and litigation costs associated with broad or unclear patents[3].

Industry Impact

The '292 patent has a substantial impact on the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in the area of dermatological treatments. It sets a precedent for the development and protection of therapeutic compositions derived from natural sources like Euphorbia species.

Expert Insights

Industry experts emphasize the importance of robust patent protection for innovative drugs like Picato®. "Strong patents are the backbone of pharmaceutical innovation, allowing companies to invest in research and development with the assurance that their intellectual property will be protected," notes a pharmaceutical industry analyst.

Statistics and Examples

  • Market Impact: Picato® has been a significant player in the dermatological treatment market since its FDA approval in 2012. The drug's success can be attributed to the strong patent protection provided by the '292 patent and related patents.
  • Litigation Costs: The litigation involving the '292 patent and other related patents has highlighted the high costs associated with patent disputes. For instance, the ongoing litigation with Actavis and Perrigo has involved extensive legal and discovery processes[1][5].

Key Takeaways

  • The '292 patent is a critical component of LEO Pharma's intellectual property portfolio, protecting the therapeutic composition of ingenol mebutate.
  • The patent's scope is defined by its detailed and specific claims, which address the stability and formulation of the drug.
  • The patent has been involved in significant litigation, particularly in Hatch-Waxman suits, to protect against generic infringement.
  • The patent landscape includes a family of related patents that collectively protect various aspects of ingenol mebutate formulations and production methods.
  • Strong patent protection is essential for maintaining innovation incentives in the pharmaceutical industry.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the main subject of the '292 patent?

The '292 patent pertains to therapeutic compositions of ingenol mebutate, specifically for the treatment of skin cancers.

2. Which company holds the '292 patent?

The '292 patent is held by LEO Pharma, Inc.

3. What are some of the related patents to the '292 patent?

Related patents include United States Patent Nos. 7,410,656, 8,372,827, 8,372,828, 8,377,919, 8,536,163, 8,716,271, 8,735,375, 9,676,698, and 9,416,084.

4. Why is the '292 patent important in the pharmaceutical industry?

The '292 patent is important because it protects the innovative formulation of ingenol mebutate, ensuring that LEO Pharma can continue to invest in research and development without fear of immediate generic competition.

5. What are some of the metrics used to measure patent scope?

Metrics such as independent claim length and independent claim count are used to measure patent scope, which can indicate the breadth and quality of the patent[3].

Citations

  1. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT ... - LEO Laboratories Limited ("LEO Labs"), and LEO Pharma, Inc. ("LEO, Inc.")[1].
  2. Case 1:16-cv-00333-JFB-SRF Document 332 Filed 06/18 ... - GovInfo[2].
  3. Patent Claims and Patent Scope - SSRN[3].
  4. US8278292B2 - Therapeutic compositions - Google Patents[4].
  5. REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION - LEO filed the present Hatch-Waxman suit[5].

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,278,292

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Leo Labs PICATO ingenol mebutate GEL;TOPICAL 202833-001 Jan 23, 2012 DISCN Yes No 8,278,292 ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
Leo Labs PICATO ingenol mebutate GEL;TOPICAL 202833-002 Jan 23, 2012 DISCN Yes No 8,278,292 ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,278,292

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom0525680.5Dec 16, 2005
PCT Information
PCT FiledDecember 18, 2006PCT Application Number:PCT/GB2006/004739
PCT Publication Date:June 21, 2007PCT Publication Number: WO2007/068963

International Family Members for US Patent 8,278,292

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1988877 ⤷  Subscribe C300682 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1988877 ⤷  Subscribe PA2014030 Lithuania ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1988877 ⤷  Subscribe CA 2014 00042 Denmark ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1988877 ⤷  Subscribe C20140025 00111 Estonia ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1988877 ⤷  Subscribe C01988877/01 Switzerland ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1988877 ⤷  Subscribe 14C0058 France ⤷  Subscribe
European Patent Office 1988877 ⤷  Subscribe 300682 Netherlands ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.