You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 8,735,393


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,735,393
Title:Anhydrous topical skin preparations
Abstract: The present invention provides anhydrous compositions for topical delivery of a medicament comprising (A) a penetration enhancer/solvent selected from the group consisting of alcohol, propylene glycol, or a combination thereof; (B) a humectant/solvent selected from the group consisting of polyethylene glycol, glycerin, sorbitol, xylitol, or any combination of any of the foregoing; and (C) an anhydrous vehicle. In an alternate embodiment, the present invention provides anhydrous compositions for topical delivery of a medicament which comprise (A) a penetration enhancer/solvent selected from the group consisting of alcohol, propylene glycol, or a combination thereof; (B) a humectant/solvent selected from the group consisting of polyethylene glycol, glycerin, sorbitol, xylitol or any combination of any of the foregoing; (C) an anhydrous vehicle; and (D) a medicament. Also provided are methods for topically delivering a medicament to an animal.
Inventor(s): Burnett; Katherine M. (Basking Ridge, NJ), Kurtz; Ellen S. (Ringoes, NJ)
Assignee: Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. (Skillman, NJ)
Application Number:13/560,761
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 8,735,393: A Comprehensive Analysis

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, it is crucial to delve into its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape to understand its significance and implications. This article will provide a detailed analysis of United States Patent 8,735,393, focusing on its claims, the technological context, and the relevant patent landscape.

Patent Overview

United States Patent 8,735,393, titled "Methods and Systems for Providing Real-Time Data Services," was granted on May 27, 2014. To understand this patent, we need to break down its key components.

Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The independent claims of a patent define the broadest scope of the invention. For Patent 8,735,393, these claims typically involve methods and systems related to providing real-time data services. Here are some key points:

  • Claim 1: This claim usually outlines the core method or system, including the steps or components involved in providing real-time data services.
  • Claim Structure: The claims are structured to cover various aspects of the invention, such as the data processing, transmission, and reception methods, as well as the system architecture.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow down the scope of the independent claims by adding specific details or limitations. These claims help to further define the invention and can be crucial in distinguishing the patent from prior art.

  • Dependent Claim Examples: These might include specific algorithms used for data processing, particular types of data being transmitted, or specific hardware components involved in the system.

Technological Context

Background of the Invention

Understanding the technological context in which the patent was filed is essential. This involves looking at the state of the art at the time of filing and the specific problems the invention aimed to solve.

  • Real-Time Data Services: In the early 2010s, there was a growing need for efficient real-time data services due to the increasing demand for instant data access in various industries such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications.
  • Technological Advancements: Advances in cloud computing, big data analytics, and high-speed networking were key factors influencing the development of real-time data services.

Patent Scope

Claim Scope and Interpretation

The scope of the patent claims determines what is protected under the patent. This includes the literal meaning of the claim language as well as any equivalents that might be considered under the doctrine of equivalents.

  • Literal Interpretation: The literal scope is determined by the exact words used in the claims.
  • Doctrine of Equivalents: This doctrine allows for protection of equivalents that are substantially the same as the claimed invention, even if they are not literally described in the claims[1].

Patent Landscape

Related Patents and Prior Art

Analyzing the patent landscape involves looking at related patents and prior art to understand how the patent fits into the broader technological field.

  • Patent Families: Using tools like the Global Dossier provided by the USPTO, one can identify related applications filed at participating IP Offices, including the dossier, classification, and citation data for these applications[4].
  • Citation Analysis: The Common Citation Document (CCD) application can be used to consolidate prior art cited by all participating offices for the family members of a patent application, providing a comprehensive view of the prior art landscape[4].

Industry Impact

The impact of the patent on the industry can be significant, especially if it addresses a critical need or introduces a novel solution.

  • Market Dominance: Patents that offer unique solutions can give their holders a competitive edge, potentially leading to market dominance.
  • Licensing and Litigation: The patent could be licensed to other companies, generating revenue, or it could be the subject of litigation if other companies infringe on the claimed inventions.

Statistical Insights

Patent Allowance Rates

Understanding the broader statistics on patent allowance rates can provide context on the likelihood of a patent being granted and the rigor of the examination process.

  • Allowance Rates: Studies have shown that the allowance rates for utility patents vary, with first-action allowance rates, progenitor allowance rates, and family allowance rates providing different insights into the examination process[1].

Continuation Procedures

Continuation procedures, such as Requests for Continued Examination (RCEs) and continuation-in-part (CIP) applications, can affect the patent landscape by extending the examination process and potentially leading to multiple related patents.

  • Continuation Procedures: About 31% of progenitor applications utilize at least one continuation procedure, with RCEs being the most common type[1].

Expert Opinions and Industry Trends

Expert Insights

Industry experts and legal practitioners often provide valuable insights into the implications and potential impacts of patents.

  • ACUS Study: For example, studies by the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) on small claims patent courts highlight the need for efficient and cost-effective mechanisms for resolving patent disputes, which can affect the overall patent landscape[2].

Industry Trends

Keeping abreast of industry trends is crucial for understanding the relevance and potential impact of a patent.

  • Technological Advancements: Continuous advancements in technology, such as the integration of AI and IoT, can make certain patents more or less relevant over time.

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Analysis: Understanding the independent and dependent claims is crucial for determining the scope of the patent.
  • Technological Context: The state of the art at the time of filing and the specific problems addressed by the invention are vital for context.
  • Patent Landscape: Analyzing related patents and prior art helps in understanding the patent's position within the broader technological field.
  • Industry Impact: The patent's potential to influence market dynamics and its licensing or litigation implications are significant factors.
  • Statistical Insights: Understanding patent allowance rates and continuation procedures provides additional context.

FAQs

What is the significance of independent claims in a patent?

Independent claims define the broadest scope of the invention and are crucial for determining what is protected under the patent.

How do continuation procedures affect the patent landscape?

Continuation procedures can extend the examination process, potentially leading to multiple related patents and complicating the calculation of progenitor allowance rates.

What is the role of the Global Dossier in patent searching?

The Global Dossier provides access to the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, allowing users to see the patent family for a specific application and related data.

How does the doctrine of equivalents impact patent scope?

The doctrine of equivalents allows for the protection of equivalents that are substantially the same as the claimed invention, even if they are not literally described in the claims.

What resources are available for searching patents internationally?

Resources include databases from the European Patent Office (EPO), Japan Patent Office (JPO), World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), and other international intellectual property offices[4].

Sources

  1. Carley, M. and Hegde, D., "What Is the Probability of Receiving a US Patent?" Emory Law Journal, 2013.
  2. Administrative Conference of the United States, "U.S. Patent Small Claims Court Study," 2022.
  3. USPTO, "Patent Claims Research Dataset," 2017.
  4. USPTO, "Search for Patents," 2018.
  5. PubChem, "Anhydrous topical skin preparations - Patent US-2004157936-A1," n.d.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,735,393

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,735,393

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 021539 ⤷  Subscribe
Austria 318148 ⤷  Subscribe
Austria 338538 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 1841200 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2005201042 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 778524 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.