You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,101,660


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,101,660
Title:Solid preparation
Abstract: The present invention provides a solid preparation containing an insulin sensitizer and an active ingredient (except insulin sensitizers), which is useful as a therapeutic drug for diabetes and the like, and which is superior in preparation characteristics such as content uniformity and dissolution property of the insulin sensitizer and the active ingredient (except insulin sensitizers), preparation hardness and the like.
Inventor(s): Koike; Masahiko (Osaka, JP), Koyama; Hiroyoshi (Osaka, JP), Hamaguchi; Naoru (Osaka, JP)
Assignee: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company (Osaka, JP)
Application Number:10/530,262
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound; Formulation; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 9,101,660: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, understanding its scope and claims is crucial for determining its validity, enforceability, and potential impact on the market. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 9,101,660, providing a thorough analysis of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape.

Understanding Patent Scope and Claims

Before diving into the specifics of Patent 9,101,660, it is essential to understand what patent scope and claims entail.

Patent Scope

The scope of a patent refers to the breadth of protection it offers. It is determined by the claims, which are the legally binding descriptions of the invention. A broader scope means the patent covers a wider range of variations and applications of the invention, while a narrower scope limits the protection to a more specific implementation[3].

Patent Claims

Patent claims are the heart of a patent application. They define the boundaries of the invention and what is protected by the patent. Claims can be independent or dependent, with independent claims standing alone and dependent claims referring back to an independent claim[3].

Patent 9,101,660 Overview

To analyze Patent 9,101,660, we need to identify its key components:

Title and Abstract

The title and abstract provide a brief overview of the invention. While the specific details of Patent 9,101,660 are not provided here, these sections typically outline the main purpose and features of the invention.

Background of the Invention

This section explains the context and prior art related to the invention. It helps in understanding the problem the invention solves and how it differs from existing solutions.

Summary of the Invention

This part summarizes the key aspects of the invention, including its novel features and how it operates.

Detailed Description of the Invention

Here, the inventors provide a detailed explanation of the invention, including drawings, diagrams, and detailed descriptions of each component.

Claims

The claims section is where the legal boundaries of the invention are defined. Each claim must be clear, concise, and supported by the description and drawings.

Analyzing the Claims of Patent 9,101,660

To analyze the claims, you need to:

Identify Independent and Dependent Claims

Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims. Dependent claims build upon independent claims and further limit the scope.

Determine Claim Scope

Each claim should be analyzed for its breadth and specificity. Broader claims offer wider protection but are more likely to be challenged for lack of novelty or non-obviousness.

Evaluate Claim Language

The language used in the claims is critical. Terms like "comprising," "consisting of," and "including" can significantly affect the scope of the claim.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the broader patent landscape is essential for assessing the impact and validity of Patent 9,101,660.

Prior Art Search

Conducting a thorough prior art search using tools like the USPTO's Patent Public Search, European Patent Office's esp@cenet, and WIPO's PATENTSCOPE can help identify similar inventions and potential challenges to the patent's validity[1][4].

Global Dossier

Using the Global Dossier service, you can access the file histories of related applications from participating IP Offices, which can provide insights into how similar inventions have been treated in different jurisdictions[1].

Common Citation Document (CCD)

The CCD application consolidates citation data from multiple offices, helping to visualize the prior art cited by different offices for the same invention[1].

Tools and Resources for Patent Analysis

Several tools and resources are available to aid in the analysis of Patent 9,101,660:

USPTO Patent Public Search

This tool allows for enhanced access to prior art and provides modern interfaces for searching U.S. patents and published patent applications[1].

Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs)

Local PTRCs offer training and resources for conducting patent searches, including access to international patent databases[1].

Patent Claims Research Dataset

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications, which can be used to analyze trends and statistics related to patent scope[3].

Case Study: Analyzing Patent 9,101,660

Step-by-Step Analysis

  1. Identify the Claims: Start by reading and understanding each claim.
  2. Analyze Claim Language: Evaluate the terms used in the claims to determine their scope.
  3. Conduct Prior Art Search: Use various databases to find similar inventions.
  4. Review Global Dossier and CCD: Access file histories and citation data to understand how the invention has been treated globally.
  5. Consult Expert Opinions: If necessary, consult with patent attorneys or experts to get a deeper understanding.

Challenges and Considerations

Patent Validity

Ensuring the patent is valid involves checking for novelty, non-obviousness, and utility. A thorough prior art search is crucial here.

Patent Infringement

Understanding the scope of the claims helps in identifying potential infringement. This is particularly important for companies looking to avoid legal disputes.

Licensing and Collaboration

A clear understanding of the patent's scope can facilitate licensing agreements and collaborations by defining what is protected and what is not.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope and Claims: The scope is defined by the claims, which must be clear and supported by the description.
  • Prior Art Search: Essential for validating the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention.
  • Global Dossier and CCD: Useful for understanding the global treatment of similar inventions.
  • Tools and Resources: Utilize USPTO tools, PTRCs, and the Patent Claims Research Dataset for comprehensive analysis.

FAQs

Q: How do I conduct a preliminary U.S. patent search?

A: You can use the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool, which provides access to U.S. patents and published patent applications. Additionally, resources like the Global Dossier and Common Citation Document can be helpful[1].

Q: What is the difference between independent and dependent claims?

A: Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims, while dependent claims build upon independent claims and further limit the scope[3].

Q: How can I access international patent databases?

A: Databases like esp@cenet from the European Patent Office, PATENTSCOPE from WIPO, and national databases from countries like Japan and China provide access to international patent information[1][4].

Q: What is the purpose of the Patent Claims Research Dataset?

A: The dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and applications, helping in the analysis of trends and statistics related to patent scope[3].

Q: Where can I get training on patent search techniques?

A: The USPTO's Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs) offer training and resources for conducting patent searches[1].

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,101,660

ApplicantTradenameGeneric NameDosageNDAApproval DateTETypeRLDRSPatent No.Patent ExpirationProductSubstanceDelist Req.Patented / Exclusive UseSubmissiondate
Takeda Pharms Usa ACTOPLUS MET metformin hydrochloride; pioglitazone hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 021842-001 Aug 29, 2005 DISCN Yes No 9,101,660 ⤷  Try for Free Y ⤷  Try for Free
Takeda Pharms Usa ACTOPLUS MET metformin hydrochloride; pioglitazone hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 021842-002 Aug 29, 2005 AB RX Yes Yes 9,101,660 ⤷  Try for Free Y ⤷  Try for Free
>Applicant>Tradename>Generic Name>Dosage>NDA>Approval Date>TE>Type>RLD>RS>Patent No.>Patent Expiration>Product>Substance>Delist Req.>Patented / Exclusive Use>Submissiondate
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 9,101,660

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Japan2002-294045Oct 7, 2002
PCT Information
PCT FiledOctober 06, 2003PCT Application Number:PCT/JP03/12781
PCT Publication Date:April 15, 2004PCT Publication Number: WO2004/030700

International Family Members for US Patent 9,101,660

CountryPatent NumberEstimated ExpirationSupplementary Protection CertificateSPC CountrySPC Expiration
Australia 2003271103 ⤷  Try for Free
Brazil 0315082 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2501587 ⤷  Try for Free
China 100427143 ⤷  Try for Free
China 1717253 ⤷  Try for Free
Colombia 5700740 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country>Patent Number>Estimated Expiration>Supplementary Protection Certificate>SPC Country>SPC Expiration
Showing 1 to 6 of 6 entries

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.