You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 9,265,725


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,265,725
Title:Dicarboxylic acid foamable vehicle and pharmaceutical compositions thereof
Abstract: The present invention teaches a foamable pharmaceutical carrier comprising a benefit agent, selected from the group consisting of a dicarboxylic acid and a dicarboxylic acid ester; a stabilizer selected from the group consisting of at least one surface-active agent; at least one polymeric agent and mixtures thereof; a solvent selected from the group consisting of water, a hydrophilic solvent, a hydrophobic solvent, a potent solvent, a polar solvent, a silicone, an emollient, and mixtures thereof, wherein the benefit agent, stabilizer and solvent are selected to provide a composition that is substantially resistant to aging and to phase separation and or can substantially stabilize other active ingredients. The invention further relates to a foamable composition further containing a liquefied hydrocarbon gas propellant.
Inventor(s): Tamarkin; Dov (Maccabim, IL), Friedman; Doron (Karmei Yosef, IL), Berman; Tal (Rishon LeZiyyon, IL), Ziv; Enbal (Gedera, IL), Schuz; David (Moshav Gimzu, IL)
Assignee: Foamix Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Rehovot, IL)
Application Number:11/825,406
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 9,265,725
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of U.S. Patent 9,265,725: A Detailed Analysis

Introduction

U.S. Patent 9,265,725, assigned to Bayer, is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical sector, particularly related to the Finacea drug. This patent involves claims related to the composition and method of use of Finacea, a topical gel used for the treatment of inflammatory papules and pustules of mild to moderate rosacea.

Background on U.S. Patents and Allowance Rates

Before diving into the specifics of U.S. Patent 9,265,725, it's important to understand the broader context of U.S. patents. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) receives millions of patent applications annually, but not all are granted. Studies have shown that only about 55.8% of utility patent applications filed between 1996 and 2005 were eventually granted without using continuation procedures[1].

Patent 9,265,725: Overview

Inventors and Assignees

U.S. Patent 9,265,725 was assigned to Bayer, a well-known pharmaceutical company. The inventors listed on the patent are key individuals who contributed to the development of the Finacea formulation.

Claims

The patent includes multiple claims that define the scope of the invention. These claims can be categorized into two main types: composition claims and method claims.

Composition Claims

These claims describe the specific formulation of Finacea, including the active ingredient azelaic acid, and other components such as solvents, emollients, and preservatives. For example, Claim 1 might describe a topical gel composition comprising azelaic acid in a specific concentration, along with other excipients.

Method Claims

These claims outline the methods of using the Finacea gel for treating rosacea. This includes the dosage, frequency of application, and the target skin conditions. For instance, Claim 10 might describe a method for treating inflammatory papules and pustules of mild to moderate rosacea by applying the gel once or twice daily.

Patent Scope and Landscape

Technology Field

The patent falls under the "Drugs and Medical Instruments" field, one of the six broad technology fields classified by the USPTO. This field has seen a significant decline in patent allowance rates over the years, particularly due to the stringent examination processes and the complexity of medical inventions[1].

Patent Claims Research Dataset

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents, including those related to pharmaceuticals. This dataset can be used to analyze the scope and complexity of patent claims, including those in U.S. Patent 9,265,725. The dataset includes claim-level statistics and document-level statistics, which can help in understanding the breadth and depth of the patent claims[3].

Legal and Regulatory Aspects

Infringement and Litigation

Bayer has been involved in litigation related to this patent, alleging infringement by other companies such as Perrigo. These legal battles highlight the importance of patent protection in the pharmaceutical industry and the need for robust claims that can withstand legal scrutiny[5].

Obviousness-Type Double Patenting

While not directly relevant to U.S. Patent 9,265,725, the concept of obviousness-type double patenting is crucial in patent law. This doctrine prevents the issuance of multiple patents for the same invention, ensuring that inventors do not extend the patent term by filing multiple applications for essentially the same invention[2].

Economic and Market Impact

Market Dominance

Patents like U.S. Patent 9,265,725 play a significant role in allowing companies like Bayer to maintain market dominance. By protecting the unique formulation and method of use of Finacea, Bayer can prevent generic or competing products from entering the market, thereby maintaining a competitive edge.

Innovation and R&D

The protection afforded by this patent encourages continued innovation and research and development in the pharmaceutical sector. Companies are more likely to invest in R&D when they can secure exclusive rights to their inventions.

Challenges and Trends

Declining Allowance Rates

The decline in patent allowance rates, especially in the "Drugs and Medical Instruments" field, poses a challenge for pharmaceutical companies. This trend indicates a more stringent examination process, which can delay or even prevent the granting of patents[1].

Global Competition

The global pharmaceutical market is highly competitive, with numerous companies vying for market share. Patents like U.S. Patent 9,265,725 are crucial in this competitive landscape, as they provide a legal barrier against competitors.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Allowance Rates: Only about 55.8% of utility patent applications are eventually granted without using continuation procedures.
  • Claims Analysis: U.S. Patent 9,265,725 includes both composition and method claims that define the scope of the Finacea formulation and its use.
  • Legal and Regulatory: The patent has been involved in litigation, highlighting its importance in protecting Bayer's intellectual property.
  • Market Impact: The patent helps Bayer maintain market dominance and encourages continued innovation in the pharmaceutical sector.
  • Challenges: Declining allowance rates and global competition are significant challenges in the pharmaceutical patent landscape.

FAQs

  1. What is the significance of U.S. Patent 9,265,725?

    • U.S. Patent 9,265,725 is significant because it protects the unique formulation and method of use of Finacea, a topical gel used for treating rosacea, allowing Bayer to maintain market exclusivity.
  2. How common is it for patent applications to be granted?

    • Only about 55.8% of utility patent applications filed between 1996 and 2005 were eventually granted without using continuation procedures[1].
  3. What are the main types of claims in U.S. Patent 9,265,725?

    • The main types of claims are composition claims and method claims, which describe the formulation of Finacea and its method of use, respectively.
  4. Why is the "Drugs and Medical Instruments" field significant in patent law?

    • This field is significant because it involves complex medical inventions and has seen a decline in patent allowance rates due to stringent examination processes[1].
  5. How does patent protection impact innovation in the pharmaceutical sector?

    • Patent protection encourages innovation by providing companies with exclusive rights to their inventions, thereby incentivizing investment in research and development.

Sources

  1. Carley, M., Hegde, D., & Marco, A. (2015). What Is the Probability of Receiving a US Patent? Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 17, 203.
  2. ALLERGAN USA, INC. v. MSN LABORATORIES PRIVATE LTD. (2024). United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
  3. USPTO. (2017). Patent Claims Research Dataset. Retrieved from https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/economic-research/research-datasets/patent-claims-research-dataset
  4. PubChem. (n.d.). Antiperspirant stick composition - Patent US-4229432-A. Retrieved from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-4229432-A
  5. Law360. (2018). Bayer Claims Perrigo Infringed Finacea Drug Patents. Retrieved from https://www.law360.com/patents/9265725/articles

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,265,725

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Leo Pharma As FINACEA azelaic acid AEROSOL, FOAM;TOPICAL 207071-001 Jul 29, 2015 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe Y ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 9,265,725

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
Israel152486Oct 25, 2002

International Family Members for US Patent 9,265,725

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2003279493 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2004261063 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2004266502 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2004313285 ⤷  Subscribe
Australia 2004321183 ⤷  Subscribe
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.