You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Details for Patent: 9,943,538


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,943,538
Title:2'-methoxy substituted oligomeric compounds and compositions for use in gene modulations
Abstract: Compositions comprising first and second oligomers are provided wherein at least a portion of the first oligomer is capable of hybridizing with at least a portion of the second oligomer, at least a portion of the first oligomer is complementary to and capable of hybridizing to a selected target nucleic acid, and at least one of the first or second oligomers includes a modified sugar and/or backbone modification. In some embodiments the modification is a 2'-OCH.sub.3 substituent group on a sugar moiety. Oligomer/protein compositions are also provided comprising an oligomer complementary to and capable of hybridizing to a selected target nucleic acid and at least one protein comprising at least a portion of an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), wherein at least one nucleotide of the oligomer has a modified sugar and/or backbone modification.
Inventor(s): Crooke; Stanley T. (Carlsbad, CA)
Assignee: Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Carlsbad, CA)
Application Number:15/851,464
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analyzing the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 9,943,538

Introduction

Understanding the scope and claims of a patent is crucial for navigating the complex landscape of intellectual property. This article will delve into the details of United States Patent 9,943,538, exploring its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape it inhabits.

Patent Overview

United States Patent 9,943,538, like any other patent, is a legally enforceable right granted to an inventor for a specified period in exchange for the public disclosure of the invention. Here, we will focus on the key elements that define this patent.

Claims Analysis

Independent and Dependent Claims

Patent claims are the most critical part of a patent application, as they define the scope of the invention. Independent claims stand alone and define the broadest scope of the invention, while dependent claims build upon the independent claims and narrow down the scope[3].

  • Independent Claims: These claims should be reviewed to understand the core invention. For example, if the patent is related to a technological device, the independent claims might describe the overall structure and function of the device.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims add specific details or limitations to the independent claims. They help in understanding the various embodiments of the invention.

Claim Scope Concepts

To analyze the claims effectively, categorizing them by scope concepts is essential. This involves grouping claims based on overarching concepts that link similar claims together. This method helps in filtering, searching, and accurately analyzing large numbers of patent claims concurrently[3].

Scope of the Invention

The scope of the invention is defined by the claims, but it is also influenced by the description and drawings provided in the patent.

Description and Drawings

The detailed description and drawings in the patent provide context to the claims. They explain how the invention works, its components, and how it is different from prior art. This section is crucial for understanding the inventor's intent and the boundaries of the invention.

Prior Art and Novelty

To determine the scope, it is essential to consider prior art and how the invention differs from it. The patent office evaluates the novelty and non-obviousness of the invention during the examination process.

Patent Landscape

Understanding the patent landscape involves analyzing how the patent fits into the broader ecosystem of related patents.

Competitor Patents

Identifying competitor patents in the same field helps in understanding potential infringement risks and opportunities for collaboration or licensing. Tools like patent analytics can be used to track patents by claims and scope concepts, making it easier to navigate the landscape[3].

Government-Interest Statements

For patents that have received government funding, government-interest statements are crucial. These statements, mandated by the Bayh-Dole Act, indicate the government's interest in the patent. This can affect the enforcement and use of the patent, especially in cases where march-in rights might be invoked[1].

Prosecution History and Laches

The prosecution history of a patent, including any amendments or continuations, can impact its enforceability.

Prosecution Laches

Recent decisions, such as in Sonos v. Google, have highlighted the importance of prosecution laches. This doctrine can render patents unenforceable if there are undue delays in the prosecution process, particularly in cases involving targeted continuation practices[5].

Expiration and Maintenance

Patent expiration and maintenance fees are critical for maintaining the validity of the patent.

Patent Expiration

Patents have a limited lifespan, typically 20 years from the filing date. Understanding when a patent is set to expire is vital for planning future strategies, whether it be for the patent holder or potential generic entrants[4].

Maintenance Fees

Regular payment of maintenance fees is necessary to keep the patent in force. Failure to pay these fees can result in the patent lapsing or being abandoned[4].

Practical Applications and Strategies

Claim Charts and Coverage

Using tools like ClaimScape® software, companies can generate interactive claim charts to review patent coverage with engineers, scientists, and management. This helps in identifying gaps in current coverage and highlighting future design opportunities[3].

Monitoring Competitors

Continuously monitoring competitor patents and their claims can help in staying ahead in the market. This involves tracking new filings, expirations, and any changes in the patent landscape.

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Analysis: Independent and dependent claims define the scope of the invention.
  • Scope Concepts: Categorizing claims by scope concepts aids in comprehensive analysis.
  • Prior Art: Understanding prior art is crucial for determining novelty and non-obviousness.
  • Patent Landscape: Analyzing competitor patents and government-interest statements is vital.
  • Prosecution History: Delays in prosecution can impact enforceability under prosecution laches.
  • Expiration and Maintenance: Keeping track of patent expiration and maintenance fees is essential.

FAQs

Q: What is the significance of independent and dependent claims in a patent? A: Independent claims define the broadest scope of the invention, while dependent claims narrow down the scope by adding specific details or limitations.

Q: How do government-interest statements impact a patent? A: Government-interest statements indicate the government's interest in a patent, which can affect enforcement and use, especially in cases where march-in rights might be invoked.

Q: What is prosecution laches, and how does it affect patents? A: Prosecution laches is a doctrine that can render patents unenforceable due to undue delays in the prosecution process, particularly in targeted continuation practices.

Q: Why is it important to track patent expiration and maintenance fees? A: Tracking patent expiration and maintenance fees is crucial for maintaining the validity of the patent and planning future strategies.

Q: How can patent analytics tools help in managing a patent portfolio? A: Patent analytics tools help in categorizing patents by claims and scope concepts, identifying gaps in coverage, and highlighting future design opportunities.

Sources

  1. The Feasibility of Using Bayh-Dole March-In Rights to Lower Drug Prices - National Bureau of Economic Research
  2. The Federal Circuit Breathes New Life into False Patent Marking Claims via Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act - Spencer Fane
  3. Patent Analytics - Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
  4. Onpattro patent expiration - Pharsight
  5. Sonos v. Google Breathes New Life into Prosecution Laches Doctrine - Morrison & Foerster LLP

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,943,538

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.