You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 23, 2024

HIPPUTOPE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Hipputope patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Hipputope is a drug marketed by Bracco and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in HIPPUTOPE is iodohippurate sodium i-131. Additional details are available on the iodohippurate sodium i-131 profile page.

AI Research Assistant
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for HIPPUTOPE?
  • What are the global sales for HIPPUTOPE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for HIPPUTOPE?
Summary for HIPPUTOPE
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 4
Patent Applications: 86
DailyMed Link:HIPPUTOPE at DailyMed
Drug patent expirations by year for HIPPUTOPE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for HIPPUTOPE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Bracco HIPPUTOPE iodohippurate sodium i-131 INJECTABLE;INJECTION 015419-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

HIPPUTOPE Market Analysis and Financial Projection Experimental

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Hematology-Oncology Drugs: A Case Study

Introduction

The landscape of hematology-oncology treatments has undergone significant transformations with the introduction of new therapeutic drugs. This article delves into the market dynamics and financial trajectories of these drugs, using specific examples to illustrate the competitive nature and shifting paradigms in this sector.

Market Adoption and Competition

The entry of new drugs into the hematology-oncology market has led to a dynamic shift in market share and clinical preferences. For instance, drugs like BRUKINSA®, IMBRUVICA®, VENCLEXTA®, ICLUSIG®, and CALQUENCE® have shown varying levels of adoption and competition.

  • BRUKINSA®: Approved by the FDA in January 2023 for chronic lymphocytic leukemia, BRUKINSA® demonstrated a remarkable 149% growth from 2022 to 2023. This rapid growth indicates a strong market acceptance and potential preference among healthcare providers[1].
  • IMBRUVICA®: Conversely, IMBRUVICA® saw a significant decline in patient counts, decreasing by 51% from its peak in 2019. This decline highlights the competitive nature of the market and the impact of new drug entries on existing treatments[1].

Market Share and Dominance

By 2023, VENCLEXTA® emerged as the leading therapeutic among the five drugs analyzed, claiming 42% of the market basket share. This dominance underscores the rapid ascent of newer drugs and the shifting clinical preferences in the hematology-oncology sector[1].

Payers and Demographics

Payer Dynamics

Medicare was found to be the dominant payer across most prescriptions, indicating a significant role of government-funded healthcare in the treatment of hematologic oncology conditions[1].

Demographic Variations

  • Race and Ethnicity: Non-Hispanic Whites made up the largest percentage of the treated population, at 76%, which is significantly higher than their 58% representation in the U.S. population. This aligns with existing literature showing higher incidence rates of blood cancers among White patients[1].
  • Gender: Treated patients were more likely to be male, at 61%, reflecting the gender disparities observed in the incidence of certain blood cancers[1].

Economic Implications of Drug Development

The development and pricing of drugs, especially in the context of precision medicines, have significant economic implications.

  • Precision Medicines: The increasing focus on precision medicines, which target small patient populations, changes optimal pricing policies. These drugs often command higher prices due to their high value to patients with specific conditions and the lack of generic competition[3].
  • Research and Development: The ability to develop precision medicines influences decisions on which drugs to prioritize in the development process and affects government research and development incentives. For example, drugs like Kalydeco (ivacaftor) for cystic fibrosis patients with specific mutations illustrate this trend, with high prices justified by the significant value to a small patient population[3].

Financial Trajectory and Market Impact

Revenue and Market Growth

The financial trajectory of companies involved in the development and marketing of these drugs is closely tied to market dynamics.

  • Market Growth: The entry of new drugs can lead to significant market growth. For instance, the growth of BRUKINSA® and VENCLEXTA® indicates a robust market demand for innovative treatments[1].

Operational Efficiencies and Cost Management

Companies must manage their operational costs effectively to maintain competitiveness.

  • Example from Other Industries: While not directly related to pharmaceuticals, companies like Hippo (NYSE: HIPO) demonstrate the importance of operational efficiencies. Hippo's focus on reducing operational expenses and improving technology-driven efficiencies led to significant improvements in their financial metrics, such as a 62% reduction in net loss and a 72% reduction in adjusted EBITDA loss[2][5].

Impact on Healthcare Providers and Patients

Access to Cutting-Edge Treatments

The availability of new drugs enhances patient access to cutting-edge treatments, but it also raises issues of equity and affordability.

  • Equity in Healthcare Access: The high-fidelity tracking of new therapeutic entries provides crucial insights for optimizing treatment strategies and addressing equity in healthcare access. Tools like Komodo Health’s Healthcare Map™ help in refining market positioning and tailoring patient outreach to align with healthcare provider preferences and patient needs[1].

Clinical Practice Shifts

The introduction of new drugs can lead to shifts in clinical practice, as healthcare providers adapt to new treatment options.

  • Clinical Preferences: The decline of IMBRUVICA® and the rise of BRUKINSA® and VENCLEXTA® illustrate how clinical preferences can shift with the availability of new therapeutic options. This shift is driven by the efficacy, safety, and patient outcomes associated with these new drugs[1].

Future Market Trajectories

Precision Medicines and Orphan Drugs

The future market trajectory is likely to be influenced by the increasing focus on precision medicines and orphan drugs.

  • Small Patient Populations: Drugs targeting small patient populations, like Kalydeco, will continue to command high prices due to their significant value to these patients. This trend may limit generic competition in these niche markets[3].

Regulatory and Policy Implications

Regulatory and policy changes will play a crucial role in shaping the future of the hematology-oncology drug market.

  • Government Incentives: The structure of government research and development incentives may need to be adjusted to support the development of precision medicines. This could include extended patent protection or other forms of support to justify the high R&D investments[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Market Dynamics: The hematology-oncology drug market is highly competitive, with new drugs significantly impacting market share and clinical preferences.
  • Demographic Variations: There are notable demographic variations in the treated population, with Non-Hispanic Whites and males being overrepresented.
  • Economic Implications: Precision medicines have significant economic implications, including higher prices and limited generic competition.
  • Operational Efficiencies: Managing operational costs and leveraging technology-driven efficiencies is crucial for maintaining competitiveness.
  • Future Trajectories: The market is likely to continue shifting towards precision medicines and orphan drugs, with regulatory and policy changes playing a key role.

FAQs

What are the key factors influencing market dynamics in the hematology-oncology drug market?

The key factors include the entry of new therapeutic drugs, shifts in clinical preferences, demographic variations, and economic implications such as pricing strategies and government incentives.

How do new drugs impact existing treatments in the market?

New drugs can lead to a decline in the market share of existing treatments, as seen with IMBRUVICA®, and can also shift clinical preferences towards newer, potentially more effective options.

What role do precision medicines play in the hematology-oncology market?

Precision medicines target small patient populations and command higher prices due to their significant value. They influence pricing policies, R&D priorities, and government incentives.

How do demographic variations affect the treated population in hematology-oncology?

Demographic variations show that Non-Hispanic Whites and males are overrepresented in the treated population, reflecting higher incidence rates of certain blood cancers in these groups.

What are the economic implications of the increasing focus on precision medicines?

The increasing focus on precision medicines leads to higher prices, limited generic competition, and changes in optimal pricing strategies and R&D priorities.

Sources

  1. Komodo Health: "Drug Snapshot: Shifting Paradigms in Hematology-Oncology" (2024)
  2. Stock Titan: "Hippo Reports Second Quarter 2024 Financial Results" (2024)
  3. National Bureau of Economic Research: "The Economics of Drug Development: Pricing and Innovation in a Changing Market" (2018)
  4. PubMed: "Shifting drug markets in North America - a global crisis in the making?" (2023)
  5. PR Newswire: "Hippo Reports Third Quarter 2024 Financial Results" (2024)

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.