You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Theophylline In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container, and when can generic versions of Theophylline In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container launch?

Theophylline In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container is a drug marketed by Hospira Inc and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER is theophylline. There are thirty-six drug master file entries for this compound. Twenty-six suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the theophylline profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Theophylline In Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container

A generic version of THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER was approved as theophylline by RHODES PHARMS on September 1st, 1982.

  Subscribe

AI Research Assistant
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What are the global sales for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
Summary for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Drug patent expirations by year for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Recent Clinical Trials for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Tanta UniversityN/A
LG ChemPhase 1
University of OklahomaPhase 1/Phase 2

See all THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Hospira Inc THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER theophylline INJECTABLE;INJECTION 019211-007 Dec 14, 1984 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
Hospira Inc THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER theophylline INJECTABLE;INJECTION 019211-005 Dec 14, 1984 DISCN No No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
Hospira Inc THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER theophylline INJECTABLE;INJECTION 019211-003 Dec 14, 1984 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe ⤷  Subscribe
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER Market Analysis and Financial Projection Experimental

Theophylline in 5% Dextrose: Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Introduction

Theophylline, a methylxanthine derivative, has been a cornerstone in the management of respiratory conditions such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for decades. When administered in a 5% dextrose solution, it offers a specific formulation that is crucial for certain clinical settings. Here, we delve into the market dynamics and financial trajectory of Theophylline in 5% Dextrose.

Market Overview

Indications and Usage

Theophylline in 5% Dextrose is primarily used as an adjunct to inhaled beta-2 selective agonists and systemically administered corticosteroids for the treatment of acute exacerbations of asthma and other chronic lung diseases like emphysema and chronic bronchitis[3][4].

Competitive Landscape

The market for theophylline is characterized by the presence of several generic and branded formulations. Theophylline itself is not a new drug, having been introduced in the early 20th century, which means that the patent protection has long expired. This has led to a highly competitive market with multiple manufacturers offering various formulations, including immediate-release and sustained-release forms[2].

Market Segmentation

The market can be segmented based on the type of formulation (oral vs. intravenous), the patient population (adults vs. children), and the specific indications (asthma vs. COPD). The intravenous formulation, particularly in 5% dextrose, is often used in acute care settings where rapid administration is necessary[3].

Financial Trajectory

Revenue Trends

The revenue generated by theophylline products has been relatively stable over the years, although it has seen some decline due to the increasing use of more modern and targeted therapies for asthma and COPD. However, theophylline remains a cost-effective option, especially in regions with limited healthcare resources, which helps maintain its market presence[2].

Pricing Dynamics

The pricing of theophylline in 5% dextrose is influenced by several factors, including the cost of raw materials, manufacturing processes, and regulatory approvals. Given that the drug is off-patent, generic competition has driven prices down, making it more accessible to a wider patient population. However, the specific formulation in 5% dextrose may command a slightly higher price due to the specialized manufacturing and packaging requirements[3].

Cost-Benefit Analysis

From a healthcare economics perspective, theophylline in 5% dextrose offers a favorable cost-benefit profile. It is generally less expensive than newer bronchodilators and biologic agents, making it an attractive option for managing chronic respiratory conditions, especially in resource-constrained settings. However, the need for frequent monitoring of serum levels to avoid toxicity can add to the overall cost of treatment[3][4].

Regulatory Environment

Approvals and Updates

Theophylline in 5% dextrose has undergone various regulatory updates, including changes to the package insert to reflect new safety information. For instance, there have been reports of non-convulsive status epilepticus in patients receiving theophylline, which has led to additional warnings and precautions[5].

Compliance and Safety

Regulatory bodies such as the FDA closely monitor the safety and efficacy of theophylline formulations. Manufacturers must comply with strict guidelines regarding the composition, packaging, and labeling of these products. The use of 5% dextrose as a solvent adds another layer of regulatory scrutiny to ensure the solution is safe and effective for intravenous administration[3][4].

Patient and Healthcare Provider Perspectives

Patient Compliance

Patient compliance with theophylline therapy can be challenging due to the need for regular dosing and monitoring of serum levels. However, the convenience of an intravenous formulation in acute settings can improve adherence. Educating patients about the importance of consistent dosing and the potential side effects can enhance compliance[2].

Healthcare Provider Preferences

Healthcare providers often prefer theophylline in 5% dextrose for its rapid onset of action and ease of administration in acute care settings. However, they must balance this with the potential for adverse effects, particularly at higher serum concentrations. The choice between oral and intravenous formulations depends on the clinical context and the patient's specific needs[3].

Future Outlook

Emerging Trends

The future market for theophylline in 5% dextrose will likely be influenced by emerging trends in respiratory care, including the development of more targeted therapies and the increasing use of biologics. However, the cost-effectiveness and established safety profile of theophylline will continue to make it a viable option for many patients[2].

Innovations in Formulation

There is ongoing research into new formulations and delivery systems for theophylline that could enhance its efficacy and safety. Innovations such as extended-release formulations or novel delivery mechanisms could potentially revitalize the market and improve patient outcomes[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Market Stability: The market for theophylline in 5% dextrose remains relatively stable due to its established use and cost-effectiveness.
  • Competitive Landscape: The presence of multiple generic and branded formulations keeps the market competitive.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Strict regulatory guidelines ensure the safety and efficacy of theophylline formulations.
  • Patient and Provider Perspectives: Compliance and preference are influenced by the convenience and rapid action of the intravenous formulation.
  • Future Outlook: Emerging trends in respiratory care and potential innovations in formulation will shape the future market.

FAQs

What are the primary indications for Theophylline in 5% Dextrose?

Theophylline in 5% Dextrose is primarily used to treat acute exacerbations of asthma and other chronic lung diseases such as emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

How is Theophylline in 5% Dextrose administered?

It is administered intravenously, often in acute care settings where rapid action is necessary.

What are the key safety considerations for Theophylline in 5% Dextrose?

Key safety considerations include the risk of non-convulsive status epilepticus, cardiac arrhythmias, and the need for frequent monitoring of serum levels to avoid toxicity.

How does the cost of Theophylline in 5% Dextrose compare to other respiratory medications?

Theophylline in 5% Dextrose is generally less expensive than newer bronchodilators and biologic agents, making it a cost-effective option.

What are the potential future developments for Theophylline formulations?

Future developments may include new formulations and delivery systems that enhance efficacy and safety, such as extended-release formulations or novel delivery mechanisms.

Sources

  1. DrugBank: Theophylline: Uses, Interactions, Mechanism of Action.
  2. StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf: Theophylline.
  3. FDA: Theophylline in 5% Dextrose Injection USP.
  4. DailyMed: Theophylline in 5% Dextrose Injection USP.
  5. FDA: Theophylline in 5% Dextrose in the Excel Plastic Container.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.