You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Patent: 10,154,856


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,154,856
Title:Therapeutic substance transfer catheter and method
Abstract: A cervical transfer catheter (10) for transferring a therapeutic substance to an endocervix or other internal mucosal surfaces of a recipient, the catheter (10) comprising: a catheter body (12) having first and second lumens (14) and (16), the second lumen (16) being adapted, in use, to allow passage and retention of a structure containing the therapeutic substance that will be released slowly and continuously. The catheter (10) also comprises an inflatable balloon (20) provided at a distal end of the first lumen (14), the inflatable balloon (20) being designed to be as small as possible in its inflated condition while still being retained in the uterus by virtue of its shape.
Inventor(s): Sillender; Mark (Bicton, AU)
Application Number:14/760,326
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Understanding the Claims and Patent Landscape of US Patent 10,154,856

Introduction

Patents are a cornerstone of innovation, providing inventors and companies with the legal right to exclude others from making, using, or selling their inventions for a limited time. This article delves into the specifics of US Patent 10,154,856, analyzing its claims and the broader patent landscape in which it exists.

The Purpose of Patents

Patents serve as a mechanism for inventors to gain economic benefits from their inventions in exchange for public disclosure of the technical information. This system is crucial for driving innovation, as it incentivizes the development and commercialization of new technologies[1].

Patent Claims: The Heart of a Patent

The claims section of a patent is its most critical part, as it defines the scope of the invention and the legal rights granted to the patent holder. Claims must be clear, concise, and fully supported by the description in the patent specification. For US Patent 10,154,856, understanding the claims requires a detailed analysis of what is being protected and how it differs from existing prior art[2].

Determining Inventorship

Inventorship is a key aspect of patent law, and it is defined by the conception of the patentable subject matter. The inventors listed on a patent must be those who conceived the idea or ideas of the patent claims. This involves identifying each person who contributed to the conception of the invention, ensuring that only those who made significant contributions are listed[3].

The Growing Complexity of Patent Applications

The number of patent applications and the number of claims within each application have been increasing steadily. This trend is driven by technological innovation and facilitated by advances in technology such as word processing and electronic database searching. As a result, managing and analyzing patent claims has become increasingly complex[2].

Advanced Patent Searching Techniques

To navigate this complex landscape, advanced patent searching techniques are essential. These techniques involve leveraging tools and strategies to identify relevant patents, analyze claims variations, and understand the prosecution history of a patent. Claims can be amended or narrowed during the prosecution process, which affects the scope of protection[4].

Patent Landscape: High-Technology and Knowledge-Intensive Industries

The patent landscape in the United States is dominated by high-technology and knowledge-intensive industries. These sectors, including high-technology manufacturing, medium-high technology manufacturing, and commercial knowledge-intensive services, account for a significant majority of patents granted. Companies like IBM, Samsung, Canon, Qualcomm, and Google are among the top recipients of USPTO patents, reflecting their heavy investment in research and development (R&D)[1].

Industry-Level Measures of Patenting

Industry-level data from the National Science Foundation (NSF) National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics Business R&D and Innovation Survey (BRDIS) provide insights into the patenting activities of R&D-performing firms. These data show that high-technology manufacturing industries and commercial knowledge-intensive services receive a disproportionate share of patents, highlighting their innovative activities[1].

Cross-Country Analysis and Tax Implications

International differences in taxes on corporate and patent income can influence the choice of patent location for multinational firms. This factor is crucial for companies deciding where to file their patents, as it can impact their economic benefits and global strategy[1].

Challenges in Patent Litigation

Patent litigation is a significant concern, with factors such as the type of patents involved and the quality of the patent examination process playing critical roles. The USPTO has been working to improve patent quality by considering trends in patent infringement litigation and linking this information to internal data on the patent examination process[5].

Case Study: US Patent 10,154,856

Claims Analysis

To analyze the claims of US Patent 10,154,856, one must start by identifying the independent claims, which define the broadest scope of the invention. Then, analyze the dependent claims, which narrow down the invention further. This hierarchical structure helps in understanding the full scope of protection granted.

Prosecution History

Reviewing the prosecution history of the patent can reveal any amendments or narrowing of claims that occurred during the examination process. This is crucial for understanding the final scope of protection and any limitations imposed by the patent office[4].

Industry Context

Understanding the industry context in which the patent is filed is essential. For example, if the patent is in a high-technology field, it is likely part of a larger portfolio of patents held by a company like IBM or Samsung. This context can provide insights into the strategic importance of the patent and its potential impact on the market[1].

Tools and Strategies for Managing Patent Claims

Automated Patent Claims Analysis

Tools like the Patent Matrix software can facilitate the rapid review of patent claims by automating the import, parsing, and hierarchical arrangement of claims. This helps in managing the complexity of large patent applications with numerous claims[2].

Graphical User Interfaces

Using graphical user interfaces (GUIs) to display and manage patent claims can enhance the user experience. These interfaces allow users to compress and expand claims hierarchically, making it easier to navigate and understand the scope of the patent[2].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims: The claims section is the most critical part of a patent, defining the scope of the invention and the legal rights granted.
  • Inventorship: Determining inventorship involves identifying those who conceived the patentable subject matter.
  • Industry Dominance: High-technology and knowledge-intensive industries dominate the patent landscape.
  • Cross-Country Analysis: Tax implications can influence the choice of patent location for multinational firms.
  • Patent Litigation: Understanding trends in patent litigation is crucial for improving patent quality.
  • Tools and Strategies: Advanced tools and strategies are necessary for managing and analyzing patent claims effectively.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary purpose of the claims section in a patent?

    • The primary purpose of the claims section is to define the scope of the invention and the legal rights granted to the patent holder.
  2. How does the determination of inventorship work in US patent law?

    • Inventorship is determined by identifying those who conceived the patentable subject matter, ensuring that only significant contributors are listed.
  3. Why is the number of patent applications increasing?

    • The number of patent applications is increasing due to technological innovation and the facilitation of the application process by advances in technology.
  4. What are the key industries dominating the US patent landscape?

    • High-technology manufacturing, medium-high technology manufacturing, and commercial knowledge-intensive services are the dominant industries.
  5. How can advanced patent searching techniques help in managing patent claims?

    • Advanced techniques involve leveraging tools and strategies to identify relevant patents, analyze claims variations, and understand the prosecution history of a patent.

Sources

  1. National Science Foundation. Chapter 8 - Invention, Knowledge Transfer, and Innovation. NSF, 2018.
  2. Google Patents. US20110138338A1 - Patent Claims Analysis System and Method.
  3. Oregon State University. Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications.
  4. CAS.org. Advanced patent searching techniques.
  5. Government Accountability Office. Assessing Factors That Affect Patent Infringement Litigation. GAO, 2013.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Details for Patent 10,154,856

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Eli Lilly And Company HUMATROPE somatropin For Injection 019640 June 23, 1987 ⤷  Subscribe 2033-02-06
Eli Lilly And Company HUMATROPE somatropin For Injection 019640 October 16, 1986 ⤷  Subscribe 2033-02-06
Eli Lilly And Company HUMATROPE somatropin For Injection 019640 February 04, 1999 ⤷  Subscribe 2033-02-06
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.