You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 21, 2024

Patent: 10,561,723


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,561,723
Title:Treatment and prevention of anal conditions
Abstract: The invention relates to methods, compositions, and kits for treating a condition with an immune response modifier and a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Conditions treatable with the methods, kits and compositions include but are not limited to neoplasia, anal intraepithelial neoplasia, high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia, dysplasia, anal dysplasia, dysplastic lesion, high-grade dysplastic lesion, condyloma, anal cancer, anal tumor, HPV infection, and any HPV-induced condition.
Inventor(s): Scheibel; Steven Frederick (Palm Springs, CA)
Assignee: Marbley; Theodore C. (Palm Springs, CA)
Application Number:15/743,133
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Comprehensive Analysis of United States Patent 10,561,723: A Deep Dive into the Claims and Patent Landscape

Introduction

Understanding the nuances of a specific patent, such as United States Patent 10,561,723, involves a detailed analysis of its claims, the broader patent landscape, and the implications of these elements on innovation and economic activity. This article will delve into the critical aspects of this patent, including its claims, the context within the U.S. patent system, and the broader implications for inventors, businesses, and policymakers.

Overview of United States Patent 10,561,723

To begin, it is essential to identify the subject matter of the patent. However, without specific details provided here, we will generalize the approach to analyzing any patent.

Patent Claims

The claims section of a patent is crucial as it defines the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. Here are some key points to consider:

Independent and Dependent Claims

  • Independent claims stand alone and define the invention without reference to other claims.
  • Dependent claims refer back to and further limit an independent claim or another dependent claim[5].

Claim Construction

  • The language used in the claims must be clear and specific to avoid ambiguity.
  • Claim construction involves interpreting the meaning of the claims, which can be critical in patent litigation[3].

Prior Art and Novelty

Prior art searches are essential to determine whether an invention is novel and non-obvious.

Prior Art Searching

  • Conducting thorough prior art searches helps in identifying existing technologies that may affect the validity or patentability of the invention.
  • This search is crucial for the success of the patent application and for ensuring that the invention does not infringe on existing patents[5].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Analyzing the patent landscape provides strategic insights into the technology domain and industry.

Competitive Intelligence

  • By examining patent data, businesses can identify emerging trends, potential competitors, and untapped market opportunities.
  • This analysis helps in assessing the competitive position and identifying white spaces in the market[5].

Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis

  • FTO analysis assesses whether a product or process may infringe on existing patents.
  • Conducting FTO analysis helps businesses avoid legal disputes and costly patent infringement litigation[5].

Diversity and Equity in Patenting

The patent landscape in the U.S. is not without its disparities, which can impact the overall innovation ecosystem.

Geographic Disparities

  • Patenting activity is not evenly distributed across the U.S. Certain regions have higher patenting intensity compared to others.
  • Federal initiatives, such as the CHIPS and Science Act, aim to create regional innovation hubs to spur development in under-resourced regions[1].

Socioeconomic and Racial Disparities

  • Studies have shown significant disparities in patenting rates based on income and racial background.
  • For example, Black inventors were granted 6 patents per million people from 1970 to 2006, compared to the overall rate of 235 patents per million people[1].

Gender Disparities

  • Men are more likely to be named as inventors on patents than women.
  • Initiatives like the USPTO pilot program have shown that providing extra guidance to pro se patent applicants can increase the success rates of women and other underrepresented groups[1].

Economic Implications

The diversity of inventors and the equity in the patent system have significant economic implications.

Potential Economic Growth

  • Closing the gender and racial patenting gap could result in a two-percentage-point increase in the U.S. gross domestic product per capita.
  • However, the complexity of economic factors makes it challenging to quantify the exact economic impacts[1].

Policy Considerations

  • Collecting demographic data from inventors could help policymakers assess and address potential inequities in the patent system.
  • Proposed legislation, such as S. 632 and H.R. 1732, aims to require the USPTO to request demographic information from inventors on a voluntary basis[1].

Role of AI in Patenting

The increasing use of AI tools in the patenting process introduces new challenges and considerations.

Disclosure Requirements

  • If AI tools are used in a way that is material to patentability, this must be disclosed to the USPTO.
  • This includes situations where AI assists in drafting patent applications or introduces alternative embodiments not conceived by the inventors[2].

Inventorship and AI Contributions

  • The contributions made by AI systems must be assessed to determine whether they rise to the level of inventorship.
  • Practitioners must verify the accuracy of factual assertions and ensure that AI-prepared documents do not introduce inaccurate statements or omit material information[2].

Patent Litigation and Data Analysis

Patent litigation data provides valuable insights into the patent landscape and the effectiveness of the patent system.

Patent Litigation Docket Report Data

  • The USPTO's Patent Litigation Docket Report Data includes detailed information on nearly 97,000 unique district court cases filed through 2020.
  • This data can be used to conduct empirical studies of patent litigation and understand the types of cases, such as infringement, declaratory judgment, and ownership disputes[3].

Strategic Insights from Patent Analysis

  • Effective patent analysis helps businesses identify emerging trends, monitor competitors, and assess the competitive landscape.
  • It also aids in strategic decision-making, risk mitigation, and the valuation of intellectual property[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims and Landscape: Understanding the claims and the broader patent landscape is crucial for inventors and businesses to navigate the intellectual property landscape effectively.
  • Diversity and Equity: Addressing disparities in patenting activity based on geographic, socioeconomic, racial, and gender factors is essential for promoting a diverse and inclusive innovation ecosystem.
  • Economic Implications: The diversity of inventors and the equity in the patent system have significant economic implications, including potential increases in GDP per capita.
  • Role of AI: The use of AI tools in patenting introduces new considerations, including disclosure requirements and the assessment of AI contributions to inventorship.
  • Patent Litigation and Data Analysis: Analyzing patent litigation data provides valuable insights into the patent landscape and the effectiveness of the patent system.

FAQs

What is the significance of prior art searches in patent applications?

Prior art searches are essential to determine whether an invention is novel and non-obvious, ensuring that the invention does not infringe on existing patents and increasing the chances of a successful patent application.

How do geographic disparities affect patenting activity in the U.S.?

Geographic disparities in patenting activity indicate that innovative activity is not evenly distributed across the country. Certain regions have higher patenting intensity, and federal initiatives aim to address these disparities by creating regional innovation hubs.

What are the economic implications of addressing diversity gaps in patenting?

Closing the gender and racial patenting gaps could result in significant economic growth, potentially increasing the U.S. gross domestic product per capita by two percentage points.

How does AI impact the patenting process?

AI tools can assist in drafting patent applications and introducing alternative embodiments, but their use must be disclosed to the USPTO if material to patentability. AI contributions must be assessed to determine whether they rise to the level of inventorship.

What is the importance of patent analysis for businesses?

Patent analysis provides strategic insights, helps manage risks, supports strategic decision-making, and enhances a company's ability to innovate and compete. It aids in identifying emerging trends, monitoring competitors, and assessing the competitive landscape.

Sources

  1. Equity in Innovation: Trends in U.S. Patenting and Inventor Diversity - CRS Report[1]
  2. U.S. Patent Office Issues Additional Guidance on Use of AI Tools - BIPC[2]
  3. Working papers and book chapters - USPTO[3]
  4. Search for patents - USPTO[4]
  5. Patent Analysis - Evalueserve[5]

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Details for Patent 10,561,723

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Merck Sharp & Dohme Llc GARDASIL human papillomavirus quadrivalent (types 6, 11, 16 and 18) vaccine, recombinant Injection 125126 June 08, 2006 10,561,723 2035-07-21
Glaxosmithkline Biologicals CERVARIX human papillomavirus bivalent (types 16 and 18) vaccine, recombinant Injection 125259 October 16, 2009 10,561,723 2035-07-21
Merck Sharp & Dohme Llc GARDASIL 9 human papillomavirus 9-valent vaccine, recombinant Injection 125508 December 10, 2014 10,561,723 2035-07-21
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.