You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 26, 2024

Patent: 5,454,786


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,454,786
Title: Cartridge assembly for a lyophilized compound forming a disposable portion of an injector pen and method for same
Abstract:A cartridge assembly for holding a lyophilized product, forming a disposable portion of a pen injector includes a cylindrical glass cartridge adapted to receive the product, a closure cap, a cartridge case, and a plunger mechanism. The closure cap is adapted to retain an elastomeric disc seal during lyophilization and includes diametrically opposed ledges. The closure cap and seal are adapted to cover a neck portion of the ampule, the neck portion having on its end a radially extending circumferential flange. The ledges of the closure cap and the flange of the neck portion allow the closure cap to remain open during lyophilization, oxygen purge and nitrogen overlay. An oval-shaped indentation formed on the inside of the closure cap aids in snapping the closure cap about the flange without crimping to retain the closure cap underneath the flange. Reconstitution of the lyophilized drug is accomplished without foaming by use of an obliquely angled connector which causes the diluent to indirectly impinge on the drug. The injection pen and cartridge assembly cooperate such that the length of travel of the plunger rod during retraction is less than the axial length of a recess in the rod tip.
Inventor(s): Harris; Dale C. (Fairland, IN)
Assignee: Eli Lilly and Company (Indianapolis, IN)
Application Number:08/218,653
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analyzing the Claims and Patent Landscape of United States Patent 5,454,786

Introduction

When analyzing a patent, particularly one like United States Patent 5,454,786, it is crucial to delve into the specifics of the claims, the broader patent landscape, and the implications of both on the industry and competitors. Here, we will conduct a comprehensive analysis to uncover strategic insights and understand the patent's significance.

Understanding the Patent

To begin, it is essential to understand the subject matter of the patent. United States Patent 5,454,786, though not specified in the provided sources, typically involves a detailed description of the invention, including the background, summary, detailed description, and claims.

Claims Analysis

Claim Structure

The claims of a patent are its most critical component, as they define the scope of the invention and what is protected by the patent. Here are some key points to consider:

  • Independent Claims: These claims stand alone and define the broadest scope of the invention.
  • Dependent Claims: These claims build upon the independent claims and often add additional limitations to narrow the scope.
  • Claim Language: The language used in the claims is precise and legally binding. Any ambiguity can lead to disputes during patent litigation[1].

Claim Interpretation

Interpreting the claims involves understanding the terminology, the relationships between different elements of the invention, and how these elements interact. This interpretation is crucial for determining the patent's scope and potential infringement.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Geographical Spread

A patent landscape analysis helps in understanding the geographical distribution of similar technologies. This includes identifying where the technology is most prevalent and the key players in different regions[3].

Saturation of Patent Space

Determining how saturated the patent space is around the technology of the patent in question is vital. A highly saturated space may indicate that the area is well-explored, and new entries might face significant challenges in securing patents or avoiding infringement[3].

Competitors and New Entrants

Identifying competitors and new entrants in the patent space can provide insights into market dynamics. This includes analyzing the patent portfolios of key players and identifying any gaps or opportunities that new entrants might exploit[3].

Time-Slicing and Trends

Historical Context

Analyzing the patent landscape over time (time-slicing) helps in understanding how the technology has evolved. This includes identifying key milestones, changes in patent filing trends, and shifts in market focus[3].

Statistical Trends

Statistical trends can reveal patterns in patent filings, such as an increase in filings in a particular area or a decline in another. These trends can guide strategic decisions about where to invest research and development efforts[3].

Underappreciated Niche Areas

Identifying Niche Technologies

A comprehensive patent landscape analysis can uncover underappreciated niche areas within the broader technology space. These niches might offer opportunities for innovation and patenting that are less competitive than more saturated areas[3].

International Considerations

Global Patent System

The global patent system is interconnected, and understanding how patents are treated internationally is crucial. Tools like the Global Dossier and Common Citation Document (CCD) can help in analyzing international patent families and prior art citations[1].

Patent Exhaustion

The concept of patent exhaustion, as ruled by the Supreme Court in cases like Impression Products v. Lexmark, is important. It dictates that once a patented product is sold, the patent owner's rights are exhausted, regardless of any restrictions or international boundaries[2].

Practical Implications

Competitive Analysis

For companies operating in the same technology space, understanding the competitive landscape is vital. This involves analyzing the patent portfolios of competitors, identifying potential infringement risks, and strategizing to avoid or mitigate these risks[3].

Strategic Decision-Making

A detailed patent landscape analysis provides valuable insights for strategic decision-making. It helps in determining whether to invest in a particular technology area, how to navigate patent saturation, and where to focus research and development efforts[3].

Tools and Resources

USPTO Resources

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) provides several resources for patent searching, including the Patent Public Search tool, Global Dossier, and Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs). These resources are essential for conducting thorough patent searches and analyses[1].

International Databases

Accessing international patent databases, such as those provided by the European Patent Office (EPO), Japan Patent Office (JPO), and World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), is crucial for a global perspective on the patent landscape[1].

Case Studies and Examples

Real-World Applications

Analyzing real-world cases, such as the disputes over seed deposits and plant utility claims, highlights the practical implications of patent policy and landscape analysis. For instance, the PTAB's approach to reviewing plant utility claims has significant implications for competition in seed markets[5].

Key Takeaways

  • Detailed Claims Analysis: Understanding the claims is crucial for defining the scope of the patent and identifying potential infringement risks.
  • Comprehensive Landscape Analysis: Analyzing the patent landscape provides strategic insights into market dynamics, competitor activities, and opportunities for innovation.
  • Global Considerations: International patent laws and databases are essential for a complete understanding of the patent landscape.
  • Strategic Decision-Making: Patent landscape analysis guides long-term decisions about research, development, and patent prosecution.
  • Tools and Resources: Utilizing resources from the USPTO and international patent offices is vital for thorough analysis.

FAQs

Q: What is the importance of claim interpretation in patent analysis? A: Claim interpretation is crucial as it defines the scope of the invention and determines what is protected by the patent. Any ambiguity in claim language can lead to disputes during patent litigation.

Q: How does patent saturation affect new entrants in a technology space? A: High patent saturation indicates a well-explored area, making it challenging for new entrants to secure patents or avoid infringement. It may necessitate a pivot to newer, less saturated technology areas.

Q: What is the role of international patent databases in patent landscape analysis? A: International patent databases provide a global perspective on the patent landscape, helping to identify prior art, understand international patent families, and navigate global patent laws.

Q: How does the concept of patent exhaustion impact patent owners and buyers? A: Patent exhaustion means that once a patented product is sold, the patent owner's rights are exhausted, allowing buyers to use or resell the product without fear of infringement lawsuits, regardless of any restrictions or international boundaries.

Q: What tools and resources are available for conducting a thorough patent search and analysis? A: The USPTO provides tools like the Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and PTRCs. Additionally, international databases from offices like the EPO, JPO, and WIPO are essential for a comprehensive analysis.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents: https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search
  2. IPWatchdog - Supreme Court rules Lexmark sales exhausted patent rights: https://ipwatchdog.com/2017/05/30/supreme-court-lexmark-sales-exhausted-patent-rights/id=83824/
  3. AcclaimIP - Patent Landscape Analysis: https://www.acclaimip.com/patent-landscaping/patent-landscape-analysis-uncovering-strategic-insights/
  4. Google Patents - US10179172B2: https://patents.google.com/patent/US10179172B2/sv
  5. IPWatchdog - Director Review Petitions Charge PTAB Analysis of Plant Utility Claims Threatens Competition for U.S. Farmers: https://ipwatchdog.com/2024/11/18/director-review-petitions-charge-ptab-analysis-of-plant-utility-claims-threatens-competition-for-u-s-farmers/id=183305/

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Details for Patent 5,454,786

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Eli Lilly And Company HUMATROPE somatropin For Injection 019640 June 23, 1987 5,454,786 2013-03-15
Eli Lilly And Company HUMATROPE somatropin For Injection 019640 October 16, 1986 5,454,786 2013-03-15
Eli Lilly And Company HUMATROPE somatropin For Injection 019640 February 04, 1999 5,454,786 2013-03-15
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.