You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 24, 2024

Patent: 6,056,957


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,056,957
Title: Humanized monoclonal antibodies against human interleukin-5
Abstract:A monoclonal antibody is provided which specifically binds to human interleukin-5. Also provided are a hybridoma which produces the monoclonal antibody; complementary DNAs which encode the heavy and light chain variable regions of the monoclonal antibody and CDRs therefrom; humanized monoclonal antibodies; and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the monoclonal antibody or anti-idiotypic antibodies directed against it, humanized monoclonal antibodies, binding fragments, binding compositions or single-chain binding proteins derived from the antibody and a physiologically acceptable carrier.
Inventor(s): Chou; Chuan-Chu (Westfield, NJ), Murgolo; Nicholas J. (Millington, NJ), Abrams; John S. (Belmont, CA), Jenh; Chung-Her (Edison, NJ), Petro; Mary E. (Green Pond, NJ), Silver; Jon E. (San Jose, CA), Tindall; Stephen (Madison, NJ), Windsor; William T. (East Brunswick, NJ), Zavodny; Paul J. (Mountainside, NJ)
Assignee: Schering Corporation (Kenilworth, NJ)
Application Number:08/284,516
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analyzing the Claims and Patent Landscape of United States Patent 6,056,957

Introduction

United States Patent 6,056,957, hereafter referred to as the '957 patent, is a significant intellectual property asset that requires a thorough analysis to understand its claims, validity, and position within the broader patent landscape. This analysis will delve into the specifics of the patent, the process of conducting a comprehensive patent search, and the strategic insights derived from patent landscape analysis.

Understanding the Patent

To begin, it is crucial to understand the subject matter of the '957 patent. This involves a detailed review of the patent's claims, description, and drawings. Here are some key aspects to consider:

Claims Analysis

  • Independent and Dependent Claims: Identify the independent claims, which define the broadest scope of the invention, and the dependent claims, which narrow down the invention further.
  • Claim Construction: Analyze the language and scope of each claim to determine what is covered and what is not. This step is critical for understanding the patent's boundaries and potential infringement issues[1].

Description and Drawings

  • Detailed Description: Review the detailed description of the invention to understand how it works, its components, and any specific embodiments.
  • Drawings and Figures: Examine the drawings and figures to visualize the invention and its various aspects.

Conducting a Preliminary Patent Search

Before diving into the patent landscape, it is essential to conduct a preliminary patent search to identify prior art and related patents.

Using USPTO Resources

  • Patent Public Search: Utilize the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool, which provides enhanced access to prior art and allows for a more comprehensive search[1].
  • Global Dossier: Access the Global Dossier to view related applications from participating IP Offices, including file histories, classification, and citation data[1].

International Search

  • Search International Patent Offices: Expand the search to international databases such as the European Patent Office (EPO), Japan Patent Office (JPO), and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to ensure global coverage[1].

Patent Landscape Analysis

A patent landscape analysis is vital for understanding the strategic position of the '957 patent within its technology area.

Key Questions to Answer

  • Geographical Spread: Determine the geographical distribution of patents in the technology area to advise on where to file and where to avoid filing to save time and money[3].
  • Saturation Level: Assess the saturation level of the patent space to counsel on the potential rewards or risks of entering that space[3].
  • New Entrants: Identify new entrants into the patent space to anticipate potential competitors[3].
  • Time-Slicing: Analyze changes over time to understand trends and shifts in the technology area[3].

Patentability Search vs. Patent Landscape Analysis

  • Patentability Search: Focuses on finding prior art specific to the claims of a new filing.
  • Patent Landscape Analysis: Provides a broader view of the entire technology area, helping to identify high saturation levels and opportunities for alternative technologies[3].

Strategic Insights

Uncovering Competitive Plans

  • Principal Patent Holders: Identify principal patent holders in adjacent technology spaces to determine if they are planning to compete[3].
  • Competing Products: Gain insight into competing products that may soon enter the market, potentially disrupting sales pipelines[3].

Niche Patent Areas

  • Underappreciated Niches: Discover underappreciated niche patent areas that could offer strategic advantages[3].

Case Study: '957 Patent in Context

Assuming the '957 patent is in a highly competitive technology area, here’s how the analysis might unfold:

Geographical Spread

  • If the '957 patent is primarily filed in the United States, but there are significant filings in Europe and Asia, this indicates a global strategy and potential competition in these regions.

Saturation Level

  • If the technology area is highly saturated, it may be challenging to secure new patents. This could prompt a strategy to pivot to newer, less crowded inventive spaces.

New Entrants

  • Identifying new entrants can help anticipate future competition and potential collaborations or acquisitions.

Time-Slicing

  • Analyzing changes over time can reveal trends such as the cessation of patent filings in certain areas, indicating a shift in technological focus.

Challenges and Controversies

PTAB Analysis and Plant Utility Claims

  • The Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB) approach to plant utility claims can create heightened standards that deter competition. For example, requiring access and sequencing of seed deposits not required during initial examination can impose significant barriers on challengers[2].

Information Withholding

  • Cases where patent applicants withhold necessary information under trade secret protection can complicate the patentability determination and potentially reduce competition[2].

Key Takeaways

  • Comprehensive Search: Conduct thorough patent searches using USPTO and international resources.
  • Landscape Analysis: Perform a patent landscape analysis to understand the geographical spread, saturation level, and competitive dynamics.
  • Strategic Insights: Use the analysis to guide long-term decisions on innovation, patent protection, and market strategy.
  • Legal Considerations: Be aware of legal challenges such as PTAB standards and information withholding that can impact patent validity and competition.

FAQs

  1. What is the purpose of a patent landscape analysis?

    • A patent landscape analysis helps attorneys, portfolio managers, and other IP professionals provide strategic advice on innovation planning, patent protection, and market strategy by analyzing the patent environment in a specific technology area[3].
  2. How does the USPTO's Patent Public Search tool enhance patent searching?

    • The Patent Public Search tool offers modern interfaces with enhanced access to prior art, improving the overall patent searching process[1].
  3. What are the key questions to answer in a patent landscape analysis?

    • Questions include determining the geographical spread of a technology patent area, assessing the saturation level, identifying new entrants, analyzing changes over time, and uncovering underappreciated niche patent areas[3].
  4. How does the PTAB's approach to plant utility claims affect competition?

    • The PTAB's heightened standards for plant utility claims can deter competition by requiring challengers to access and sequence seed deposits, which may not be feasible or necessary during initial examination[2].
  5. What is the significance of time-slicing in patent landscape analysis?

    • Time-slicing helps in understanding trends and shifts in the technology area over time, allowing for better strategic decisions on where to focus resources and when to pivot to new technologies[3].

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents
  2. IP Watchdog - Director Review Petitions Charge PTAB Analysis of Plant Utility Claims Threatens Competition for U.S. Farmers
  3. AcclaimIP - Patent Landscape Analysis - Uncovering Strategic Insights

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Details for Patent 6,056,957

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Teva Respiratory, Llc CINQAIR reslizumab Injection 761033 March 23, 2016 ⤷  Subscribe 2017-05-02
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.