You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 22, 2024

Patent: 6,872,397


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,872,397
Title: Method for treating neuromuscular disorders and conditions with botulinum toxin types A and B
Abstract:A method of treating a patient suffering from a disease, disorder or condition includes the administration to the patient of a therapeutically effective amount of botulinum toxin of a selected serotype until the patient experiences loss of clinical response to the administered botulinum toxin and thereafter administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of another botulinum toxin of a different serotype.
Inventor(s): Aoki; K. Roger (Laguna Hills, CA), Grayston; Michael W. (Irvine, CA), Carlson; Steven R. (Laguna Nigel, CA), Leon; Judith M. (Laguna Niguel, CA)
Assignee: Allergan, Inc. (Irvine, CA)
Application Number:09/812,113
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Comprehensive Analysis of the Claims and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 6,872,397

Introduction

Understanding the intricacies of a patent, particularly one like United States Patent 6,872,397, involves a detailed analysis of its claims, the patent landscape, and the broader implications of recent updates in patent law and practice. This article will delve into these aspects, providing insights into how to read and interpret the patent, the significance of the claims, and the strategic importance of patent landscape analysis.

Understanding the Patent Document

To begin, it is crucial to know how to read a U.S. patent document. The patent includes several key sections:

  • Document Number and Type: Identified by the prefix "US" and the code "B2" indicating a previously published application[4].
  • Application and Patent Dates: Important for understanding the timeline of the patent[4].
  • IPC and National Classifications: These codes help categorize the patent within specific technological areas[4].
  • Title of the Invention: A brief description limited to 500 characters or less[4].
  • References: Cited prior art by the inventor and patent examiner[4].
  • Drawings: Illustrate the technical details of the invention, though not required for process or method inventions[4].
  • Specification: A detailed written description of the invention, including prior art, drawings, and the preferred embodiment[4].
  • Claims: Define the scope of protection for the patent, preceded by "I claim" or "What is claimed"[4].

The Importance of Claims

Claims are the heart of a patent, defining the legal boundaries of the invention. Here are some key considerations:

  • Drafting Claims: Claims must be carefully drafted to set the scope and boundaries of the patent rights. Small mistakes can have significant impacts in litigation[5].
  • Claim Construction: The specification is highly relevant to claim construction analysis. It is often the single best guide to the meaning of disputed terms[5].
  • Amendments During Prosecution: Claims can be amended during the prosecution process, but the specification rarely changes, emphasizing its importance[5].

Recent USPTO Guidance on AI Patents

The 2024 USPTO guidance update on AI patents is particularly relevant for understanding the eligibility of AI-related inventions:

  • Focus on Practical Application: The update emphasizes evaluating whether a claim integrates a judicial exception into a practical application. This involves assessing additional elements to determine if they impose meaningful limits on the exception, transforming the claim into patent-eligible subject matter[1].
  • AI-Assisted Inventions: The method of invention development, including the use of AI, does not impact subject matter eligibility. The focus remains on the claimed invention itself, ensuring AI-assisted inventions are evaluated equally with other technologies[1].
  • Incorporation of Recent Case Law: The guidance integrates recent Federal Circuit decisions, promoting consistency and clarity in the application of patent eligibility criteria[1].

Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent landscape analysis is crucial for strategic decision-making in IP management:

  • Comprehensive Approach: Unlike basic patentability searches, a full patent landscape analysis provides a high-level view of an entire technology area, helping identify patent saturation and potential areas for innovation[2].
  • Beyond Known Competitors: Thorough analysis involves searching broadly, not just focusing on direct competitors. This helps uncover hidden trends and opportunities in the patent landscape[2].
  • Strategic Insights: Patent landscape analysis aids in making long-term decisions about technology development and resource allocation by identifying areas of high patent saturation and emerging trends[2].

Reading and Interpreting Claims of US Patent 6,872,397

To analyze the claims of US Patent 6,872,397, one must follow these steps:

  • Identify Claim Types: Determine if the claims are independent or dependent, and understand the scope each type defines[4].
  • Analyze Claim Elements: Break down each claim into its elements and assess how they contribute to the overall invention. Ensure that each element is clearly described in the specification[5].
  • Check for Amendments: Review any amendments made during the prosecution process to understand how the claims were refined or narrowed[3].

Practical Application and Real-World Benefits

The 2024 USPTO guidance highlights the importance of demonstrating real-world applications and concrete benefits:

  • Example 48: This example illustrates how specifying the use of separated audio components in a real-time speech recognition system enhances the accuracy of voice commands, transforming an abstract idea into a practical application[1].
  • Applying to Other Fields: By leveraging such examples, claims in various fields can be crafted to provide meaningful, tangible benefits, ensuring they meet the criteria for patent eligibility[1].

Strategic Considerations

When analyzing the patent landscape and drafting claims, several strategic considerations are essential:

  • Broad Searches: Conduct thorough patent landscape analyses to uncover trends and opportunities beyond direct competitors[2].
  • Careful Drafting: Ensure that both the specification and claims are carefully drafted to avoid pitfalls in litigation and to maintain strong patent protection[5].
  • Integration of Recent Case Law: Keep abreast of recent judicial decisions and incorporate them into your patent strategy to ensure consistency and clarity in the application of patent eligibility criteria[1].

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Define Patent Boundaries: Carefully draft claims to ensure they accurately define the scope of protection for the invention.
  • Specification is Crucial: The specification is highly relevant to claim construction and should be detailed and accurate.
  • Patent Landscape Analysis: Conduct comprehensive patent landscape analyses to make informed strategic decisions.
  • AI Patents Require Practical Application: Ensure AI-related claims integrate judicial exceptions into practical applications to meet patent eligibility criteria.
  • Stay Updated with Case Law: Incorporate recent judicial decisions into your patent strategy to maintain consistency and clarity.

FAQs

What is the significance of the specification in a patent document?

The specification is crucial as it provides a detailed written description of the invention, including prior art, drawings, and the preferred embodiment. It is highly relevant to claim construction analysis and can rarely be changed during prosecution[4][5].

How does the 2024 USPTO guidance impact AI-related patent claims?

The guidance emphasizes evaluating whether claims integrate judicial exceptions into practical applications and clarifies that AI-assisted inventions are evaluated on equal footing with other technologies. It also incorporates recent Federal Circuit decisions to promote consistency and clarity[1].

What is the difference between a basic patentability search and a full patent landscape analysis?

A basic patentability search focuses on potential prior art for specific claims, while a full patent landscape analysis provides a comprehensive view of an entire technology area, helping identify patent saturation and emerging trends[2].

Why is careful drafting of claims important?

Careful drafting of claims is essential to avoid mistakes that can have significant impacts in litigation. Claims define the scope and boundaries of the patent rights, and small errors can lead to noninfringement rulings or invalidation of the patent[5].

How can patent landscape analysis aid in strategic decision-making?

Patent landscape analysis helps in making long-term decisions about technology development and resource allocation by identifying areas of high patent saturation and emerging trends. It also aids in uncovering hidden trends and opportunities beyond direct competitors[2].

Sources

  1. Understanding the 2024 USPTO Guidance Update on AI Patent - Mintz
  2. Patent Landscape Analysis - Uncovering Strategic Insights - AcclaimIP
  3. Advanced patent searching techniques - CAS.org
  4. How to Read a U.S. Patent - Queens University Library
  5. Practical Considerations and Strategies in Drafting U.S. Patent - Finnegan

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Details for Patent 6,872,397

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Solstice Neurosciences, Llc MYOBLOC rimabotulinumtoxinb Injection 103846 December 08, 2000 ⤷  Subscribe 2013-06-10
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.