You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 7, 2025

Patent: 7,416,858


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,416,858
Title:Pharmaceutical compositions of glycoconjugates
Abstract: The invention includes methods and compositions for remodeling a peptide molecule, including the addition or deletion of one or more glycosyl groups to a peptide, and/or the addition of a modifying group of peptide.
Inventor(s): DeFrees; Shawn (North Wales, PA), Zopf; David A. (Wayne, PA), Bayer; Robert J. (San Diego, CA), Bowe; Caryn (Doylestown, PA), Hakes; David James (Willow Grove, PA), Chen; Xi (Lansdale, PA)
Assignee: Neose Technologies, Inc. (Horsham, PA)
Application Number:10/492,261
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analyzing the Claims and Patent Landscape of United States Patent 7,416,858

Introduction

When evaluating the patent landscape and claims of a specific patent, such as United States Patent 7,416,858, it is crucial to conduct a comprehensive and critical analysis. This involves understanding the patent's claims, the technological context, and the broader patent landscape. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the key aspects to consider.

Understanding the Patent Claims

Claim Structure and Scope

To begin, it is essential to analyze the claims of the patent in question. Claims define the scope of the invention and are critical in determining the patent's validity and enforceability. For U.S. Patent 7,416,858, each claim should be scrutinized to identify the essential elements, limitations, and any dependencies between claims.

Claim Types

Patents typically include various types of claims, such as independent and dependent claims. Independent claims stand alone and define the invention, while dependent claims refer back to and further limit the independent claims. Understanding the hierarchy and interdependencies of these claims is vital for a thorough analysis[4].

Technological Context

Background and Field of the Invention

The background section of the patent provides context about the field of the invention, existing problems, and how the invention addresses these issues. This section helps in understanding the innovation and its significance within the technological landscape.

Detailed Description of the Invention

The detailed description section explains the invention in detail, including drawings and examples. This part is crucial for understanding how the invention works and its specific features.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent Saturated Spaces

A patent landscape analysis helps in determining the saturation level of the specific technology space. For U.S. Patent 7,416,858, this involves identifying existing patents, pending applications, and other relevant intellectual property in the same technological area. This analysis can reveal potential competitors, areas of high innovation, and gaps in the market[5].

Competitor Analysis

Identifying key competitors and their patent portfolios is essential. This can be done by analyzing the patent holdings of major players in the field and comparing them to the patent in question. Tools like the USPTO's Global Dossier and Patent Public Search can facilitate this analysis by providing access to related applications and file histories from participating IP offices[4].

Patentability and Validity Searches

Conducting patentability and validity searches is crucial to assess the strength of the patent. A patentability search identifies prior art that may affect the novelty and non-obviousness of the claims, while a validity search evaluates the patent's enforceability by assessing prior art that may invalidate the patent. These searches help in determining whether the claims should be revised or if the patent is likely to withstand challenges[3].

Strategic Insights from Patent Landscape Analysis

Market Trends and Innovation Hotspots

A comprehensive patent landscape analysis can uncover market trends and innovation hotspots. By analyzing the patent filings over time, one can identify areas where there is significant innovation and investment. This can guide business and R&D decisions, helping companies to pivot to newer, less saturated technological spaces[5].

Competitor Strategies

Analyzing the patent strategies of competitors can provide valuable insights. For example, identifying which technologies competitors are focusing on, how they are protecting their innovations, and any gaps in their patent portfolios can inform strategic decisions.

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

Patent Eligibility

The patent eligibility of AI-related inventions, for instance, has been a subject of recent updates by the USPTO. The 2024 guidance update clarifies the process for determining the patent eligibility of AI-related inventions, emphasizing the integration of judicial exceptions into practical applications and the role of AI as a tool rather than a determinant of eligibility[2].

National Security and Secrecy Orders

In cases where national security is a concern, such as inventions with U.S. Government property interests, patent security reviews are conducted to determine if disclosure of the invention might be detrimental to national security. This involves a detailed process managed by the Department of Defense and the USPTO[1].

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Analysis: Thoroughly understand the structure, scope, and interdependencies of the patent claims.
  • Technological Context: Review the background and detailed description to grasp the innovation and its significance.
  • Patent Landscape: Conduct a comprehensive analysis to identify market trends, competitor strategies, and saturation levels.
  • Legal Considerations: Ensure compliance with recent USPTO guidance and national security regulations.
  • Strategic Insights: Use the analysis to inform business and R&D decisions, identifying opportunities and potential challenges.

FAQs

Q: What is the importance of analyzing the claims of a patent? A: Analyzing the claims helps in understanding the scope of the invention, its limitations, and its enforceability. It is crucial for determining the patent's validity and potential infringement.

Q: How does a patent landscape analysis differ from a patentability search? A: A patent landscape analysis provides a high-level view of the entire technology area, helping to identify market trends and competitor strategies, while a patentability search focuses on identifying prior art specific to the claims of a new filing.

Q: What tools are available for conducting a patent search? A: Tools such as the USPTO's Patent Public Search, Global Dossier, and Patent and Trademark Resource Centers (PTRCs) are available for conducting comprehensive patent searches.

Q: How do recent USPTO updates impact AI-related patent applications? A: The 2024 USPTO guidance update clarifies the process for determining the patent eligibility of AI-related inventions, emphasizing the integration of judicial exceptions into practical applications and the role of AI as a tool.

Q: What role does national security play in patent reviews? A: National security reviews are conducted to determine if the disclosure of an invention might be detrimental to national security, particularly in cases where the U.S. Government has a property interest in the invention.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Details for Patent 7,416,858

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Microbix Biosystems Inc. KINLYTIC urokinase For Injection 021846 January 16, 1978 7,416,858 2040-03-31
Novo Nordisk Inc. REBINYN coagulation factor ix (recombinant), glycopegylated For Injection 125611 May 31, 2017 7,416,858 2040-03-31
Novo Nordisk Inc. REBINYN coagulation factor ix (recombinant), glycopegylated For Injection 125611 August 11, 2022 7,416,858 2040-03-31
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.