You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 23, 2024

Patent: 7,097,834


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,097,834
Title:Osteoprotegerin binding proteins
Abstract: A novel polypeptide, osteoprotegerin binding protein, involved in osteolcast maturation has been identified based upon its affinity for osteoprotegerin. Nucleic acid sequences encoding the polypeptide, or a fragment, analog or derivative thereof, vectors and host cells for production, methods of preparing osteoprotegerin binding protein, and binding assays are also described. Compositions and methods for the treatment of bone diseases such as osteoporosis, bone loss due to arthritis or metastasis, hypercalcemia, and Paget\'s disease are also provided.
Inventor(s): Boyle; William J. (Moorpark, CA)
Assignee: Amgen Inc. (Thousand Oaks, CA)
Application Number:09/211,315
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Understanding the Claims and Patent Landscape of US Patent 7,097,834

Introduction

US Patent 7,097,834, titled "Osteoprotegerin binding proteins," is a significant patent in the field of biotechnology, particularly in the area of osteoclast maturation and bone health. This article provides a comprehensive and critical analysis of the claims and the broader patent landscape surrounding this patent.

Background of the Patent

US Patent 7,097,834 was granted to identify a novel polypeptide, the osteoprotegerin binding protein, which is involved in osteoclast maturation. Osteoprotegerin is a protein that plays a crucial role in regulating bone resorption by inhibiting the formation and activation of osteoclasts[4].

Claims Analysis

Claim Structure

The patent includes multiple claims, each defining different aspects of the osteoprotegerin binding protein. These claims can be categorized into several types:

  • Composition claims: These claims describe the polypeptide itself, its amino acid sequence, and any variants or fragments.
  • Method claims: These claims outline methods for using the osteoprotegerin binding protein, such as in therapeutic applications or diagnostic tests.
  • Use claims: These claims specify the uses of the osteoprotegerin binding protein, including its role in treating or preventing bone-related diseases.

Claim Scope and Specificity

The claims are crafted to be specific enough to protect the invention while being broad enough to cover potential variations and applications. For instance, the patent claims not only the exact amino acid sequence but also variants and fragments that retain the biological activity of the protein. This approach helps in ensuring that the patent holder has a strong position against potential infringers while also allowing for future developments based on the original invention.

Patent Landscape

Continuation Applications and Family Allowance Rates

The patent landscape for biotechnology patents, including US Patent 7,097,834, is complex due to the use of continuation applications. Continuation applications allow applicants to file new applications based on an existing (progenitor) application, which can lead to multiple related patents. This practice is common in biotechnology, where the initial application may not cover all potential aspects of the invention. The family allowance rate, which includes the outcomes of continuation applications, is a critical metric in understanding the overall success rate of patent applications in this field[1].

Obviousness-Type Double Patenting (ODP)

A significant issue in the patent landscape is the risk of obviousness-type double patenting (ODP). This doctrine prevents the granting of multiple patents on the same invention or obvious modifications thereof. Recent court decisions, such as In re Cellect, emphasize the importance of filing terminal disclaimers to avoid ODP issues, especially when dealing with continuation applications and patent term adjustments[2].

Advanced Patent Searching Techniques

Conducting a comprehensive patent search is essential for understanding the patent landscape surrounding US Patent 7,097,834. Advanced techniques involve going beyond basic searches to include variations in claims, amendments during prosecution, and related patents within the same patent family. Claims may be amended or narrowed during the prosecution process, which can affect the scope of protection and potential infringement issues[3].

Regulatory and Legal Considerations

FRAND Determination and SEP Regulation

While US Patent 7,097,834 is a U.S. patent, regulatory and legal considerations in other jurisdictions can impact the broader patent landscape. For example, the European Commission's proposal for the regulation of Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) highlights the complexities of determining Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) rates and the potential for legal disputes. These regulations can influence how patents are valued and licensed, even if they are not directly applicable to U.S. patents[5].

Impact on Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries

US Patent 7,097,834 has significant implications for the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. The discovery of the osteoprotegerin binding protein opens up new avenues for treating bone-related diseases, such as osteoporosis and bone metastases. The patent's claims and the broader patent landscape will influence how this technology is developed, licensed, and commercialized.

Challenges and Criticisms

Patent Term Adjustments and ODP

One of the challenges faced by patent holders in this field is the management of patent term adjustments and the risk of ODP. The In re Cellect decision highlights the importance of proactive management of these issues to avoid invalidation of patents due to ODP[2].

Continuation Applications and Patent Thickets

The use of continuation applications can create complex patent thickets, making it difficult for other innovators to navigate the patent landscape. This can lead to increased costs and legal disputes, potentially hindering innovation in the field[1].

Key Takeaways

  • Specific and Broad Claims: US Patent 7,097,834 includes specific and broad claims to protect the invention while allowing for future developments.
  • Continuation Applications: The use of continuation applications is common in biotechnology, complicating the patent landscape and requiring careful management.
  • ODP Risks: Patent holders must be vigilant about ODP risks, especially when dealing with continuation applications and patent term adjustments.
  • Regulatory Impact: Regulatory proposals and legal considerations in various jurisdictions can influence the valuation and licensing of patents.
  • Industry Impact: The patent has significant implications for the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, particularly in the treatment of bone-related diseases.

FAQs

What is the main subject of US Patent 7,097,834?

US Patent 7,097,834 is focused on a novel polypeptide known as the osteoprotegerin binding protein, which is involved in osteoclast maturation.

How do continuation applications affect the patent landscape?

Continuation applications can lead to multiple related patents, complicating the patent landscape and requiring careful tracking to understand the full scope of protection.

What is the significance of obviousness-type double patenting (ODP)?

ODP prevents the granting of multiple patents on the same invention or obvious modifications thereof, and recent court decisions emphasize the need for terminal disclaimers to avoid ODP issues.

How do regulatory proposals like the EC's SEP regulation impact U.S. patents?

While not directly applicable, such proposals can influence how patents are valued and licensed globally, affecting the broader patent landscape and potential licensing agreements.

What are the potential challenges for patent holders in managing patent term adjustments?

Patent holders must manage patent term adjustments carefully to avoid ODP issues, which can result in the invalidation of patents if not properly addressed.

Sources

  1. Carley, M., & Hegde, D. What Is the Probability of Receiving a US Patent? [PDF]. YJOLT.
  2. Mintz. Federal Circuit Puts the Onus on Patent Owners to Disclaim Patent. Mintz Insights.
  3. CAS. Advanced patent searching techniques. CAS Insights.
  4. *US7097834B1 - Osteoprotegerin binding proteins. Google Patents.
  5. Kluwer Patent Blog. A Critical Analysis of the EC Proposal for SEP Regulation. Kluwer Patent Blog.

More… ↓

⤷  Subscribe

Details for Patent 7,097,834

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Amgen Inc. PROLIA denosumab Injection 125320 June 01, 2010 7,097,834 2017-04-16
Amgen Inc. XGEVA denosumab Injection 125320 November 18, 2010 7,097,834 2017-04-16
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.s.a., Inc. NATPARA parathyroid hormone For Injection 125511 January 23, 2015 7,097,834 2017-04-16
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.