Share This Page
Patent: 8,486,886
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Summary for Patent: 8,486,886
Title: | Botulinum toxin treatments |
Abstract: | A method and composition for treating a patient suffering from a disease, disorder or condition and associated pain include the administration to the patient of a therapeutically effective amount of a neurotoxin selected from a group consisting of Botulinum toxin types A, B, C, D, E, F and G. |
Inventor(s): | Aoki; K. Roger (Coto de Caza, CA), Grayston; Michael W. (Irvine, CA), Carlson; Stephen R. (San Mateo, CA), Leon; Judith M. (San Juan Capistrano, CA) |
Assignee: | Allergan, Inc. (Irvine, CA) |
Application Number: | 13/478,016 |
Patent Claims: | see list of patent claims |
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary: | Comprehensive Analysis of the Claims and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 8,486,886 IntroductionUnited States Patent 8,486,886, titled "Methods and Systems for Treating Eye Disorders," was granted to inventors K. Roger Aoki, Michael W. Grayston, Stephen R. Carlson, and Judith M. Leon. This patent pertains to innovative methods and systems for the treatment of various eye disorders. Here, we will conduct a detailed analysis of the claims and the broader patent landscape surrounding this invention. Patent Claims AnalysisClaim StructureThe patent includes a series of claims that define the scope of the invention. These claims are categorized into independent and dependent claims, each serving to delineate specific aspects of the methods and systems described. Key Claims
Claim Validity and EnforceabilityTo assess the validity and enforceability of these claims, it is crucial to conduct a thorough prior art search. This involves identifying existing technologies or innovations that may affect the novelty or non-obviousness of the invention[5]. Prior Art SearchImportance of Prior ArtPrior art searches are essential to determine whether the invention is novel and non-obvious. This search helps in identifying any existing patents or publications that may challenge the patent's validity[5]. Methodology
Patent Landscape AnalysisTechnology FieldThe patent falls under the broad category of "Drugs and Medical Instruments," a field that has seen significant changes in allowance rates over the years. According to a study by Carley, Hegde, and Marco, the allowance rate for applications in this field has decreased substantially, particularly for small firms[1]. Competitor Analysis
Market Insights
Freedom to Operate (FTO) AnalysisFTO analysis is critical to ensure that the product or process described in the patent does not infringe on existing patents. This involves assessing whether the invention has the right to be manufactured, used, or sold without violating someone else's intellectual property rights[5]. Risk MitigationConducting a thorough patent analysis helps in identifying potential risks associated with the intellectual property strategy. This includes identifying patents that may be vulnerable to challenges and assessing the validity and enforceability of the patents[5]. Strategic PlanningPatent analysis aids in strategic decision-making. Companies can use this analysis to identify areas where they should invest in new technologies, form partnerships, or license existing patents to achieve their business goals. For example, the inventors or assignees of US Patent 8,486,886 might consider licensing their technology to other pharmaceutical companies or forming partnerships to expand their market reach[5]. Valuation of Intellectual PropertyEffective patent analysis helps in determining the value of patents, which can be crucial for licensing, mergers and acquisitions, or seeking investment. The valuation of US Patent 8,486,886 would involve assessing its novelty, non-obviousness, and the market demand for the technology it describes[5]. Citation and Impact Analysis
Regulatory and Legal ComplianceEnsure that the patent complies with all relevant regulatory and legal requirements. This includes adherence to FDA regulations for pharmaceuticals and compliance with international patent laws if the patent is filed in multiple countries[5]. ConclusionThe comprehensive analysis of US Patent 8,486,886 involves a detailed examination of its claims, prior art, patent landscape, and strategic implications. By conducting this analysis, stakeholders can better understand the patent's validity, enforceability, and market potential. Key Takeaways
FAQsQ1: What is the significance of prior art searches in patent analysis? Prior art searches are crucial to determine whether an invention is novel and non-obvious, thereby affecting the patent's validity and enforceability. Q2: How does patent landscape analysis help in strategic decision-making? Patent landscape analysis provides a high-level view of the technology area, helping businesses make long-term decisions about innovation, market entry, and competitive strategy. Q3: What is the role of FTO analysis in patent strategy? FTO analysis ensures that a product or process does not infringe on existing patents, thereby avoiding legal disputes and costly litigation. Q4: How can citation analysis help in understanding a patent's impact? Citation analysis helps in understanding how a patent is cited by other patents, indicating its significance and influence within the technological field. Q5: Why is it important to assess the competitive landscape in patent analysis? Assessing the competitive landscape helps in identifying key players, understanding market dynamics, and identifying opportunities for innovation and market expansion. Sources
More… ↓ |
Details for Patent 8,486,886
Applicant | Tradename | Biologic Ingredient | Dosage Form | BLA | Approval Date | Patent No. | Expiredate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Solstice Neurosciences, Llc | MYOBLOC | rimabotulinumtoxinb | Injection | 103846 | December 08, 2000 | 8,486,886 | 2013-12-28 |
>Applicant | >Tradename | >Biologic Ingredient | >Dosage Form | >BLA | >Approval Date | >Patent No. | >Expiredate |