You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for NINTEDANIB ESYLATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for NINTEDANIB ESYLATE

Vendor Vendor Homepage Vendor Sku API Url
Molepedia ⤷  Get Started Free M90932676P ⤷  Get Started Free
AKos Consulting & Solutions ⤷  Get Started Free AKOS025149444 ⤷  Get Started Free
MedChemexpress MCE ⤷  Get Started Free HY-11106 ⤷  Get Started Free
A2Z Chemical ⤷  Get Started Free AZM13354 ⤷  Get Started Free
Finetech Industry Limited ⤷  Get Started Free FT-0696830 ⤷  Get Started Free
AKos Consulting & Solutions ⤷  Get Started Free AKOS025402006 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Vendor >Vendor Homepage >Vendor Sku >API Url

Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Sources for: Nintedanib Esylate

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Nintedanib esylate is a molecularly targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor primarily used in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and certain types of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As the patent landscape evolves and demand surges, sourcing high-quality bulk APIs becomes crucial for pharmaceutical companies aiming to produce effective, compliant, and cost-efficient medications. This report evaluates the global landscape of API suppliers for nintedanib esylate, emphasizing reliability, regulatory compliance, manufacturing capacity, and competitive positioning.


Regulatory and Quality Considerations

The procurement of API, particularly for markets with rigorous regulatory standards such as the U.S. FDA, EMA, and PMDA, demands adherence to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). Suppliers must possess requisite certifications, detailed quality control systems, and proven track records of compliance ([1]). Limited or substandard sources can jeopardize approval processes and market access.


Major API Suppliers for Nintedanib Esylate

1. Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany)

As the originator of nintedanib (Ofev®), Boehringer Ingelheim is the most direct and reliable source for the API. Given their integrated manufacturing processes, they supply pharmaceutical-grade API exclusively to ensure integrity and traceability. Their controlled supply chain assures high purity, consistent quality, and compliance with global regulatory standards. However, their capacity may be limited to meet only their own drug production needs, and external supply is generally restrictive.

Advantages:

  • Proven quality and supply chain integrity.
  • Full regulatory oversight.
  • Direct access with assured documentation and traceability.

Limitations:

  • Limited global availability outside licensing agreements.
  • Higher cost relative to third-party suppliers.

2. Third-Party API Manufacturers in China

China remains a dominant player in bulk API manufacturing, with a burgeoning number of GMP-certified facilities producing nintedanib esylate. Companies such as Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co., Ltd., have established strong reputations for producing complex APIs. Their capacity for large-scale production, coupled with competitive pricing, renders them attractive options.

Advantages:

  • Cost-effective manufacturing.
  • Large production capacities.
  • Increasing regulatory compliance as Chinese manufacturers attain GMP and ISO certifications.

Limitations:

  • Variability in quality assurance documentation.
  • Possible delays due to regulatory inspections or audit compliance.
  • Language and communication barriers.

3. Indian API Manufacturers

India’s pharmaceutical industry hosts several reputed APIs manufacturers like Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company (SPARC), Biocon, and Aurobindo Pharma, which are expanding their portfolios into complex molecules including nintedanib esylate. Their strategic focus on quality and GMP standards makes them viable sources.

Advantages:

  • Competitive pricing.
  • Growing capacity for complex APIs.
  • Export-friendly regulatory environment.

Limitations:

  • Nascent experience with niche oncology and fibrosis APIs.
  • Variability in documentation and compliance standards among lesser-known suppliers.

4. European and North American API Manufacturers

While the landscape for nintedanib esylate API manufacturing in Europe and North America remains limited, a few specialized contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs) are capable of producing high-fidelity APIs under strict GMP standards.

Examples:

  • Lonza (Switzerland): Known for high-quality APIs and biopharmaceutical services but less focused on small molecule synthesis like nintedanib.
  • PCI Synthesis (France): Offers custom synthesis of complex APIs with high regulatory standards.

Advantages:

  • Strict quality control.
  • Strict regulatory compliance.

Limitations:

  • Higher costs.
  • Smaller production capacities.

Emerging and Niche API Suppliers

Several small and mid-sized manufacturers focus on niche APIs, including nintedanib esylate. These often function as CMOs or offer intermediate quantities for clinical trials and early-phase production.

Considerations:

  • Due diligence on regulatory compliance.
  • Capacity limitations.
  • Potential delays in scaling production.

Supply Chain Challenges and Risks

  • Regulatory Hurdles: New suppliers may lack extensive GMP documentation or face delays during inspection audits, impacting supply consistency.
  • Quality Variability: Variance in impurity profiles or residual solvents can impact API efficacy and safety.
  • Intellectual Property (IP): Licensing agreements may restrict third-party production; companies should verify licensing rights before procurement.
  • Political and Economic Factors: Tariffs, trade restrictions, or geopolitical tensions can affect supply stability.

Conclusion

Sourcing nintedanib esylate API demands a comprehensive evaluation balancing regulatory compliance, manufacturing capacity, cost, and supply stability. Originator-supported procurement provides the highest quality assurance but might limit flexibility. Chinese and Indian manufacturers offer competitive alternatives with increasing regulatory acceptance, provided due diligence is exercised. European and North American suppliers serve niche roles, often as contract manufacturers, emphasizing quality over cost. Strategic sourcing should consider long-term supply stability, regulatory pathways, and potential licensing restrictions.


Key Takeaways

  • Verify regulatory compliance and GMP certification before engaging with third-party API suppliers for nintedanib esylate.
  • Prioritize suppliers with proven track records in complex molecule manufacturing, especially in China and India, for cost-effective sourcing.
  • Establish clear licensing and intellectual property arrangements to avoid legal complications.
  • Balance quality and cost considerations to ensure regulatory approval and market competitiveness.
  • Monitor geopolitical and trade developments that could influence supply chain stability and costs.

FAQs

1. Can I source nintedanib esylate API directly from Boehringer Ingelheim?
Yes, but only through authorized licensing agreements or direct contracts, as they primarily supply their own manufacturing units and partner institutions. Unlicensed bulk purchase is generally restricted.

2. What should be the primary criteria when selecting an API supplier for nintedanib esylate?
Regulatory GMP certification, consistent quality, manufacturing capacity, compliance documentation, and reliable supply history.

3. Are Chinese API manufacturers compliant with international regulatory standards?
Many Chinese manufacturers now hold GMP and ISO certifications and undergo regular inspections by regulatory agencies. Due diligence remains essential.

4. How does licensing affect API sourcing options?
Licensing agreements with patent holders—like Boehringer Ingelheim—dictate authorized manufacturing and territories, limiting unlicensed procurement options.

5. Is there a risk of adulteration or variability in API quality from third-party suppliers?
Yes. To mitigate this risk, perform rigorous quality audits, review batch testing results, and verify certifications before procurement.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) regulations. 21 CFR Parts 210 and 211, 2009.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.