You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for methyprylon


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for methyprylon

Vendor Vendor Homepage Vendor Sku API Url
NovoSeek ⤷  Get Started Free 4162 ⤷  Get Started Free
ABI Chem ⤷  Get Started Free AC1L1HJV ⤷  Get Started Free
AKos Consulting & Solutions ⤷  Get Started Free AKOS006239549 ⤷  Get Started Free
Chembase.cn ⤷  Get Started Free 978 ⤷  Get Started Free
Aurora Fine Chemicals LLC ⤷  Get Started Free A06.787.840 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Vendor >Vendor Homepage >Vendor Sku >API Url

Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Sources for Methyprylon

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Methyprylon, a central nervous system (CNS) depressant classified under sedative-hypnotics, was historically prescribed for insomnia and anxiety management. Developed in the 1950s, it belongs to the pyrrolidone group of compounds, sharing similarities with other barbiturate derivatives.[1] Although its clinical use has significantly declined due to safety concerns, methyprylon remains a controlled substance in many jurisdictions.

The procurement of high-quality Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) is crucial for pharmaceutical manufacturing, research, and regulatory compliance. This report examines the current landscape of bulk methyprylon API sources, including manufacturing origins, supply channels, and regulatory considerations.


Regulatory Landscape and Market Context

Global Regulations and Control:
Methyprylon is classified as a Schedule IV or equivalent controlled substance in the United States, Europe, and other regions due to its potential for abuse and dependence.[2] These regulations restrict manufacturing, import, and distribution, creating barriers to API sourcing.

Market Status:
Manufacturing of methyprylon has diminished substantially since the 1970s. Consequently, the current market for bulk API is limited, characterized more by legacy suppliers, niche producers, or research-grade sources rather than mass-market manufacturers.


Major Sources of Methyprylon API

1. Established API Manufacturers in China and India

China:
China remains the most prominent source of bulk APIs across various therapeutic classes, including CNS agents. Several Chinese API manufacturing firms, such as Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and North China Pharmaceutical Group Corporation, historically produced barbiturate derivatives, including methyprylon.[3]

However, due to stricter regulatory controls, export restrictions, and increased quality scrutiny post-2018, obtaining methyprylon from China may involve complex compliance procedures. Manufacturers typically require detailed certifications, quality data, and adherence to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards.

India:
India's API industry, exemplified by companies like Divi's Laboratories and GVK Biosciences, historically manufactured a range of CNS APIs. While focus has shifted away from sedative-hypnotics, some Indian firms may still produce methyprylon or related compounds through third-party arrangements or legacy product lines.

Access requires due diligence regarding GMP compliance and regulatory approval, especially because APIs in India are often produced for export under strict regulatory oversight.

2. Specialty and Boutique API Suppliers

Given the limited demand, niche API suppliers and chemical brokers sometimes offer methyprylon APIs. These sources often serve research institutions or compounding pharmacies and may provide custom synthesis or small-batch supplies.

Key considerations include:

  • Quality assurance through Certificates of Analysis (CoAs)
  • Verification of GMP compliance
  • Clear documentation of manufacturing origin

3. Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs)

Certain Contract Manufacturing Organizations with expertise in CNS compounds may offer custom synthesis services for methyprylon. These CMOs usually operate under strict quality protocols and can produce APIs tailored to specific batch sizes and specifications.

Another avenue for sourcing involves private label or white-label suppliers, although these are less common for controlled substances due to regulatory restrictions.


Challenges in API Sourcing

  • Regulatory Barriers: Strict controls on Schedule IV substances limit availability and require extensive documentation and licensing.
  • Supply Chain Disruptions: Political tensions, import restrictions, and compliance hurdles can hinder continuous supply.
  • Quality Concerns: Suppliers must demonstrate GMP compliance, stability data, and purity specifications, which are rarely available from non-regulated sources.
  • Limited Manufacturers: The decline in clinical and research use of methyprylon reduces the number of active producers.

Due Diligence and Compliance

To ensure ethical and legal procurement, organizations must verify:

  • GMP Certification: Confirm that the supplier complies with international quality standards (e.g., ISO, cGMP).
  • Regulatory Approvals: Ensure APIs meet the regulatory requirements of the importing country, including import licenses and Schedule IV handling protocols.
  • Third-Party Audits: Conduct supplier audits or third-party verifications where possible.

Failure to adhere to compliance standards risks legal penalties, product recalls, or safety issues.


Future Outlook

While the current market for methyprylon API remains niche and constrained, it persists mainly in phased-out or legacy formulations, research, or regulatory filings. The general trend favors reduction in barbiturate use, pushing companies to seek alternative sedative agents with better safety profiles.

Nevertheless, for specific research or historical purposes, access to high-purity, GMP-certified methyprylon APIs remains vital, although procurement will remain challenging and highly regulated.


Key Takeaways

  • Limited Market: The global supply of methyprylon API is restricted, primarily originating from Chinese and Indian manufacturers with legacy production capabilities.
  • Regulatory Challenges: Stringent controls and Schedule IV classification impose significant barriers on sourcing, requiring extensive compliance measures.
  • Quality Assurance: Buyers must prioritize GMP standards, regulatory approvals, and detailed documentation to ensure API integrity.
  • Niche Suppliers: Specialty chemical brokers and contract manufacturers may serve research or niche pharmaceutical needs but are less accessible for mass production.
  • Future Sustainability: The declining clinical and recreational use diminishes the demand, impacting the availability and commercial viability of methyprylon API.

FAQs

1. Is methyprylon still commercially manufactured today?
Manufacturing has largely ceased or declined sharply due to safety concerns and regulatory restrictions. Any existing production is limited and primarily intended for research or legacy use.

2. Which countries are the primary sources of methyprylon API?
China and India historically produced methyprylon, but current supply is limited due to regulatory restrictions. Some specialized suppliers and brokers may still offer small quantities.

3. What regulatory considerations must I account for when sourcing methyprylon?
Given its Schedule IV status, import and manufacturing require appropriate licensing, GMP certification, and adherence to local laws governing controlled substances.

4. How can I verify the quality of bulk methyprylon API?
Request Certificates of Analysis, inquire about GMP compliance, and verify regulatory approvals. Third-party audits or certifications can further confirm quality standards.

5. Are there alternatives to methyprylon for sedative-hypnotic research?
Yes, newer agents like benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepine hypnotics are considered safer and are more readily available commercially.


References

[1] Katzung, B. G., & Trevor, A. J. (2012). Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. McGraw-Hill Education.
[2] DEA Diversion Control Division. (2022). Controlled Substances Schedule. U.S. Department of Justice.
[3] Smith, J. P., & Lee, C. H. (2019). "Global API Manufacturing Trends." Pharmaceutical Technology, 43(5), 24-30.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.