You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 7, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BEXTRA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for BEXTRA

Trial IDTitleStatusSponsorPhaseStart DateSummary
NCT00660855 ↗ A Multicenter, Open Label Trial To Evaluate Pain Relief With Intravenous Followed By Oral Therapy With Parecoxib/Valdecoxib 40 Mg/Day For Treatment Of Post-Laparoscopic Surgery Pain Terminated Pfizer Phase 4 2004-06-01 The objectives of this study were to assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of parecoxib/valdecoxib on post-laparoscopic surgery analgesia.
NCT00647829 ↗ A Comparison Of Valdecoxib 20 Mg Twice Daily and 40 Mg Daily and Placebo In The Treatment Of Sore Throat Completed Pfizer Phase 3 2003-02-01 The study was performed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy, safety, and tolerability of valdecoxib 20 mg twice daily (BID), valdecoxib 40 mg once daily (QD), and placebo in patients with moderately to severely painful symptomatic sore throat over a 24-hour period. In addition, the study was to validate a new scale and criteria for measuring pain in sore throat and evaluate the effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and past sore throat pain on pain score and efficacy of analgesics. The study also examined what type of medications are commonly used for sore throat and whether this information has relevance to analgesic efficacy.
NCT00650455 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Valdecoxib and Naproxen in Treating the Signs and Symptoms of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in a Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Completed Pfizer Phase 4 2003-02-01 The objectives of the study were to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of valdecoxib 10 mg once daily (QD) or naproxen 500 mg twice daily (BID) versus placebo, and to assess the efficacy of valdecoxib 10 mg QD versus naproxen 500 mg BID, in treating the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a severe Rheumatoid Arthritis population.
>Trial ID>Title>Status>Phase>Start Date>Summary
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries

Clinical Trial Conditions for BEXTRA

Condition Name

1110-0.100.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.911.1Pain, Post SurgicalPharyngitisArthritis, Rheumatoid[disabled in preview]
Condition Name for BEXTRA
Intervention Trials
Pain, Post Surgical 1
Pharyngitis 1
Arthritis, Rheumatoid 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

1110-0.100.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.911.1Pain, PostoperativeSigns and SymptomsArthritis, Rheumatoid[disabled in preview]
Condition MeSH for BEXTRA
Intervention Trials
Pain, Postoperative 1
Signs and Symptoms 1
Arthritis, Rheumatoid 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BEXTRA

Trials by Country

+
Trials by Country for BEXTRA
Location Trials
United States 20
Canada 3
Argentina 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

+
Trials by US State for BEXTRA
Location Trials
Florida 2
Washington 1
Virginia 1
Texas 1
Rhode Island 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BEXTRA

Clinical Trial Phase

66.7%33.3%0-0.200.20.40.60.811.21.41.61.822.2Phase 4Phase 3[disabled in preview]
Clinical Trial Phase for BEXTRA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

66.7%33.3%0-0.200.20.40.60.811.21.41.61.822.2CompletedTerminated[disabled in preview]
Clinical Trial Status for BEXTRA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BEXTRA

Sponsor Name

trials0112233Pfizer[disabled in preview]
Sponsor Name for BEXTRA
Sponsor Trials
Pfizer 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

100.0%000.511.522.53Industry[disabled in preview]
Sponsor Type for BEXTRA
Sponsor Trials
Industry 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

BEXTRA: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projections

Introduction

BEXTRA, known generically as valdecoxib, was a selective COX-2 inhibitor approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in November 2001 for the relief of the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis (OA) and adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA)[4].

Clinical Trials and Efficacy

Osteoarthritis

Clinical trials lasting 3-6 months demonstrated that BEXTRA was effective in treating the signs and symptoms of OA. Five double-blind, randomized, controlled trials involving 3918 patients showed that BEXTRA was superior to placebo in improving pain, stiffness, and functional measures as assessed by the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) osteoarthritis index. The 10 mg/day dose of BEXTRA was comparable to naproxen in these measures, with no additional benefit observed at the 20 mg/day dose[1].

Rheumatoid Arthritis

BEXTRA also demonstrated significant efficacy in treating the signs and symptoms of RA. Four double-blind, randomized, controlled studies involving 3444 patients showed that BEXTRA reduced the number of tender and swollen joints and improved patient global, physician global, patient pain, patient function assessment, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, as measured by the ACR (American College of Rheumatology) 20 improvement criteria[1].

Gastrointestinal Safety

One of the key selling points of BEXTRA was its gastrointestinal safety profile. Scheduled upper GI endoscopic evaluations in over 800 OA patients showed that BEXTRA at doses of 10 and 20 mg daily was associated with a statistically significant lower incidence of endoscopic gastroduodenal ulcers compared to active comparators[1].

Market Analysis

Introduction and Initial Success

BEXTRA was introduced to the market in January 2002 and quickly gained popularity due to its perceived gastrointestinal safety advantages over traditional NSAIDs. The drug was part of a class of COX-2 inhibitors that included Vioxx and Celebrex, which were marketed as being easier on the stomach[3].

Impact of Vioxx Withdrawal

The market dynamics for BEXTRA and other COX-2 inhibitors changed significantly after Merck voluntarily pulled Vioxx from the market in September 2004 due to increased risks of heart attacks and strokes associated with long-term use. This event cast a shadow over the entire class of COX-2 inhibitors, including BEXTRA and Celebrex[2].

FDA Actions and Market Withdrawal

In April 2005, the FDA requested that Pfizer suspend sales of BEXTRA due to concerns over its cardiovascular risks and rare but serious skin conditions. Despite clinical trials showing BEXTRA's efficacy and gastrointestinal safety, the FDA determined that the risks outweighed the benefits. Pfizer reluctantly agreed to suspend sales, marking a significant blow to the company given BEXTRA's $1.3 billion in sales the previous year[5].

Projections and Future Outlook

Post-Market Withdrawal

Following its withdrawal from the market, Pfizer expressed a desire to conduct additional research to better understand BEXTRA's cardiovascular risks and potentially reintroduce the drug in a limited capacity. However, these efforts were met with skepticism, and the drug remained off the market[5].

Impact on the Pharmaceutical Industry

The withdrawal of BEXTRA, along with the earlier withdrawal of Vioxx, had a profound impact on the pharmaceutical industry. It led to increased scrutiny of drug safety and the implementation of stronger warning labels for all prescription NSAIDs, including COX-2 inhibitors like Celebrex. This shift emphasized the importance of long-term safety data and rigorous post-marketing surveillance[2].

Consumer and Physician Perceptions

The saga surrounding BEXTRA and other COX-2 inhibitors influenced consumer and physician perceptions of pain management medications. It highlighted the need for a balanced approach to drug development, where efficacy must be weighed against potential risks. This led to a more cautious prescribing environment and increased awareness among patients about the potential side effects of their medications[3].

Key Takeaways

  • Efficacy: BEXTRA was effective in treating OA and RA, with a favorable gastrointestinal safety profile.
  • Market Impact: The drug's market success was short-lived due to concerns over cardiovascular risks and skin conditions.
  • Regulatory Actions: The FDA's decision to withdraw BEXTRA from the market was based on a risk-benefit analysis that favored caution.
  • Industry Impact: The withdrawal led to increased scrutiny of drug safety and changes in labeling and prescribing practices.
  • Consumer Awareness: The incident raised consumer awareness about the importance of understanding drug risks and benefits.

FAQs

Q: What was BEXTRA used for?

BEXTRA (valdecoxib) was used for the relief of the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis (OA) and adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA)[4].

Q: Why was BEXTRA withdrawn from the market?

BEXTRA was withdrawn due to concerns over its cardiovascular risks and rare but serious skin conditions, which the FDA determined outweighed the drug's benefits[5].

Q: How did BEXTRA compare to other COX-2 inhibitors?

BEXTRA was part of a class of COX-2 inhibitors that included Vioxx and Celebrex. While it had a favorable gastrointestinal safety profile, it shared cardiovascular risk concerns with these other drugs[2].

Q: What were the common side effects of BEXTRA?

Common side effects included headache, abdominal pain, upset stomach, and nausea[4].

Q: Can BEXTRA be reintroduced to the market?

Pfizer expressed interest in conducting additional research to potentially reintroduce BEXTRA, but as of now, the drug remains off the market[5].

Sources

  1. BEXTRA® valdecoxib tablets - FDA Label[1]
  2. Drug Safety: Bextra - PBS News[2]
  3. THE CASE OF COX-2 INHIBITORS - NBER Working Paper[3]
  4. FDA Approves Valdecoxib (Bextra) for Treatment in Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis - Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center[4]
  5. Bextra taken off market - The Spokesman-Review[5]

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.