You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: November 22, 2024

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR EXTRANEAL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for EXTRANEAL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00368641 ↗ Heart Failure and Peritoneal Ultrafiltration Terminated Baxter Healthcare Corporation Phase 2 2006-08-01 The objective of the study is to determine if the addition of peritoneal ultrafiltration to standard therapy in treatment-resistant severe heart failure patients will improve fluid balance and functional capacity such that they will spend less time in the hospital and have an improved ambulatory quality of life in comparison to patients who remain on standard therapy alone.
NCT00397358 ↗ Effect of Extraneal (Icodextrin)on Triglyceride Levels in PD Patients Withdrawn Baxter Healthcare Corporation Phase 4 2006-11-01 This is a Phase IV study evaluating triglyceride levels in peritoneal dialysis patients.
NCT00567398 ↗ IMPENDIA- PEN VS Dianeal Only Improved Metabolic Control In Diabetic CAPD and APD Patients Completed Baxter Healthcare Corporation Phase 3 2008-04-01 Primary Objective: To demonstrate that use of glucose sparing prescriptions (PEN vs Dianeal) in diabetic (Type 1 and Type 2) Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD)and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (APD) patients leads to improved metabolic control as measured by the magnitude of change from the baseline value in the HbA1c levels. Secondary Objectives: To demonstrate that use of glucose-sparing PD solutions (PEN vs Dianeal) in diabetic (Type 1 and Type 2) CAPD and APD patients leads to lower glycemic-control medication requirements, decreased incidence of severe hypoglycemic events requiring medical intervention, improved metabolic control, nutritional status, and Quality of Life. In a subgroup of patients, the impact of glucose-sparing PD solutions (PEN vs Dianeal only) on abdominal fat and left ventricular (LV) structure and function will be assessed.
NCT00567489 ↗ IMPENDIA- PEN VS Dianeal Only Improved Metabolic Control In Diabetic CAPD and APD Patients Completed Baxter Healthcare Corporation Phase 4 2008-01-01 Primary Objective: To demonstrate that use of glucose sparing prescriptions (PEN vs Dianeal only) in diabetic (Type 1 and Type 2) Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (APD)patients leads to improved metabolic control as measured by the magnitude of change from the baseline value in the HbA1c levels. Secondary Objectives: To demonstrate that use of glucose-sparing PD solutions (PEN vs Dianeal only) in diabetic (Type 1 and Type 2) CAPD and APD patients leads to lower glycemic-control medication requirements, decreased incidence of severe hypoglycemic events requiring medical intervention, improved metabolic control, nutritional status, and Quality of Life. In a subgroup of patients, the impact of glucose-sparing PD solutions (PEN vs Dianeal only) on abdominal fat and left ventricular (LV) structure and function will be assessed.
NCT00725517 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of a 7.5% Icodextrin Peritoneal Dialysis Solution in Once-Daily Long Dwell Exchange Completed Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Phase 4 2005-12-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 7.5% Icodextrin peritoneal dialysis solution for once-daily long dwell exchange in patients undergoing Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) in Chinese uremic patients.Patients were divided into Dianeal group or Extraneal group for long dwell time. Net ultrafiltration, small solute clearance and relationship between different transport group were used to evaluate efficacy of Icodextrin. Physical examination, vital signs and laboratory tests were used to evaluate safety of Icodextrin.
NCT01124227 ↗ Peritoneal Dialysis in Congestive Heart Failure Terminated Baxter Healthcare Corporation Phase 3 2010-04-01 Rationale: End-stage congestive heart failure is a serious invalidating condition with a poor prognosis and increasing incidence. Non-randomized observations showed peritoneal dialysis (PD) in these patients to improve clinically from NYHA stadium III-IV to as low as NYHA stadium I-II. A randomized trial is needed to test whether PD improves symptoms in this condition and to find an optimal scheme. Objective: To improve symptomatology in severe chronic failure patients. Study design: Open, parallel intervention trial comparing 2 schemes of peritoneal dialysis with icodextrin (Extraneal®) with standard medical therapy.. Study population: Patients with chronic refractory left ventricular congestive heart failure (LVEF < 30%, older than 18 years). Intervention: Peritoneal dialysis with one (night) or two (night and day) dwells with icodextrin (Extraneal®). Main study parameters/endpoints: Reduction in NYHA classification of symptomatic Congestive Heart Failure at 8 months after start of PD therapy. Burden of congestive heart failure: measured by reduction in unfavorable days (noted by patients in diaries and including days of hospitalization for CHF-deterioration and death).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for EXTRANEAL

Condition Name

Condition Name for EXTRANEAL
Intervention Trials
Peritoneal Dialysis 3
Diabetes 3
ESRD 2
CAPD 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for EXTRANEAL
Intervention Trials
Kidney Failure, Chronic 3
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic 2
Heart Failure 2
Kidney Diseases 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for EXTRANEAL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for EXTRANEAL
Location Trials
United States 7
Australia 6
Canada 6
Korea, Republic of 3
Belgium 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for EXTRANEAL
Location Trials
California 2
Nebraska 1
Indiana 1
North Carolina 1
Illinois 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for EXTRANEAL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for EXTRANEAL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 4
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for EXTRANEAL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
Not yet recruiting 2
Terminated 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for EXTRANEAL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for EXTRANEAL
Sponsor Trials
Baxter Healthcare Corporation 8
Martini Hospital Groningen 1
Pr Eric Goffin 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for EXTRANEAL
Sponsor Trials
Industry 9
Other 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.