You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: October 31, 2024

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ENTERO VU 24%


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Entero Vu 24%

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00303784 ↗ Prostate Adenocarcinoma TransCutaneous Hormones Recruiting Medical Research Council Phase 3 2006-03-01 RATIONALE: The increasingly prolonged and extended use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the treatment of prostate cancer, usually achieved through the administration of LHRH agonists, has raised concerns about long-term toxicities, in particular osteoporosis and adverse metabolic changes which may be associated with type II diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk. An alternative approach is to investigate other methods of ADT. Oral oestrogen has been shown to be as effective as LHRH and surgical orchidectomy in achieving castrate levels of testosterone and has equivalent or improved prostate cancer outcomes but is not used routinely as first-line therapy because of the risk of cardiovascular system (CVS) complications. The CVS complications have been attributed to first-pass hepatic metabolism. Administering oestrogen parenterally avoids the entero-hepatic circulation and so is expected to mitigate the risk of CVS toxicity whilst still effectively suppressing testosterone to castrate levels. This hypothesis has been supported by results from the early stages of this trial which have provided sufficient indication of the safety and efficacy of the patches to warrant further investigation of the treatment in this setting, as recommended by the IDMC.. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well the estrogen skin patch works compared with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist injections in treating patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer.
NCT00303784 ↗ Prostate Adenocarcinoma TransCutaneous Hormones Recruiting University College, London Phase 3 2006-03-01 RATIONALE: The increasingly prolonged and extended use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the treatment of prostate cancer, usually achieved through the administration of LHRH agonists, has raised concerns about long-term toxicities, in particular osteoporosis and adverse metabolic changes which may be associated with type II diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk. An alternative approach is to investigate other methods of ADT. Oral oestrogen has been shown to be as effective as LHRH and surgical orchidectomy in achieving castrate levels of testosterone and has equivalent or improved prostate cancer outcomes but is not used routinely as first-line therapy because of the risk of cardiovascular system (CVS) complications. The CVS complications have been attributed to first-pass hepatic metabolism. Administering oestrogen parenterally avoids the entero-hepatic circulation and so is expected to mitigate the risk of CVS toxicity whilst still effectively suppressing testosterone to castrate levels. This hypothesis has been supported by results from the early stages of this trial which have provided sufficient indication of the safety and efficacy of the patches to warrant further investigation of the treatment in this setting, as recommended by the IDMC.. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well the estrogen skin patch works compared with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist injections in treating patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer.
NCT00303784 ↗ Prostate Adenocarcinoma TransCutaneous Hormones Recruiting Imperial College London Phase 3 2006-03-01 RATIONALE: The increasingly prolonged and extended use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the treatment of prostate cancer, usually achieved through the administration of LHRH agonists, has raised concerns about long-term toxicities, in particular osteoporosis and adverse metabolic changes which may be associated with type II diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk. An alternative approach is to investigate other methods of ADT. Oral oestrogen has been shown to be as effective as LHRH and surgical orchidectomy in achieving castrate levels of testosterone and has equivalent or improved prostate cancer outcomes but is not used routinely as first-line therapy because of the risk of cardiovascular system (CVS) complications. The CVS complications have been attributed to first-pass hepatic metabolism. Administering oestrogen parenterally avoids the entero-hepatic circulation and so is expected to mitigate the risk of CVS toxicity whilst still effectively suppressing testosterone to castrate levels. This hypothesis has been supported by results from the early stages of this trial which have provided sufficient indication of the safety and efficacy of the patches to warrant further investigation of the treatment in this setting, as recommended by the IDMC.. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well the estrogen skin patch works compared with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist injections in treating patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer.
NCT00353496 ↗ Study of Lanreotide Autogel in Non-functioning Entero-pancreatic Endocrine Tumours Completed Ipsen Phase 3 2006-06-01 The study will compare the difference between lanreotide Autogel and placebo on progression free survival in patients who have an endocrine tumour in the pancreas or intestines.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Entero Vu 24%

Condition Name

Condition Name for Entero Vu 24%
Intervention Trials
Neuroendocrine Tumors 7
Neuroendocrine Carcinoma 3
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 3
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Entero Vu 24%
Intervention Trials
Neuroendocrine Tumors 15
Carcinoid Tumor 9
Pancreatic Neoplasms 5
Adenoma, Islet Cell 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Entero Vu 24%

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Entero Vu 24%
Location Trials
United States 17
Italy 9
France 5
United Kingdom 5
Germany 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Entero Vu 24%
Location Trials
California 4
Maryland 3
Texas 2
New York 2
Massachusetts 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Entero Vu 24%

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Entero Vu 24%
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 3
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 15
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Entero Vu 24%
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 15
Recruiting 5
Not yet recruiting 4
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Entero Vu 24%

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Entero Vu 24%
Sponsor Trials
Ipsen 5
GlaxoSmithKline 3
Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la cura dei Tumori 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Entero Vu 24%
Sponsor Trials
Other 43
Industry 9
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.